Suppr超能文献

一项关于 ICSI 与染色体异常关联的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between ICSI and chromosome abnormalities.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio, Tampere , Finland.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Aug 20;27(5):801-847. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the decade following the introduction of ICSI, a higher prevalence of de novo chromosome abnormalities, in particular sex chromosome and autosomal structural abnormalities, as well as inherited abnormalities was described in children conceived by ICSI compared to both naturally conceived (NC) children and children conceived by standard IVF. The explanation for the observed increase in prevalence is not clear and has been suggested to reflect parental factors (e.g. age or sperm quality) or to be a result of the ICSI procedure itself. Over the years, the procedure, as well as the patient group, and indications for ICSI treatment have changed.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of chromosome abnormalities in ICSI pregnancies and children and to examine any potentially increased risk compared to standard IVF and NC.

SEARCH METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Libraries and Web of Science up to October 2020 were searched. Primary outcome measures were overall chromosome abnormalities and de novo abnormalities (including sex chromosome abnormalities and autosomal abnormalities). The secondary outcome was inherited abnormalities. We followed the PRISMA guidelines and relevant meta-analyses were performed.

OUTCOMES

The search included 4648 articles, out of which 27 met the inclusion criteria, and 19 were included in quantitative synthesis (meta-analyses). The prevalence of chromosome abnormalities varied considerably between studies, possibly explained by large differences in sample size and patient demographics. Only five studies were eligible for pooled analyses on adjusted data. All studies had a critical risk of bias. Results from pooled adjusted data showed no evidence of an increased risk of overall chromosome abnormalities when comparing ICSI to either standard IVF (aOR 0.75 (95% CI 0.41-1.38)) or NC (aOR 1.29 (95% CI 0.69-2.43)). In contrast, meta-analyses on unadjusted data showed an increased risk of overall chromosome abnormalities in ICSI compared to both standard IVF (OR 1.42 (95% CI 1.09-1.85)) and NC (OR 2.46 (95% CI 1.52-3.99)) and an increased risk of de novo abnormalities in ICSI compared to NC (OR 2.62 (95% CI 2.07-3.31)). Yet, based on a very low certainty of evidence, the conclusion remains, that no indication of an increased risk of chromosome abnormalities in ICSI offspring could be found. If an increased risk of chromosome abnormalities in selected ICSI offspring should exist, the absolute risk continues to be small.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This review provides an extensive overview of the existing evidence on the relationship between ICSI and chromosome abnormalities in the offspring. We highlight the need for well-designed large, prospective, controlled studies with systematic cytogenetic testing. Existing data are limited and, in many cases, marred by critical levels of bias.

摘要

背景

在 ICSI 引入后的十年中,与自然受孕(NC)儿童和标准 IVF 受孕儿童相比,通过 ICSI 受孕的儿童中出现了更多的新发染色体异常,尤其是性染色体和常染色体结构异常,以及遗传异常。对于观察到的发病率增加的解释尚不清楚,有人认为这反映了父母因素(例如年龄或精子质量),也有人认为这是 ICSI 本身的结果。多年来,该程序以及患者群体和 ICSI 治疗的适应证都发生了变化。

目的和理由

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估 ICSI 妊娠和儿童中染色体异常的发生率,并检查与标准 IVF 和 NC 相比是否存在潜在的更高风险。

检索方法

截至 2020 年 10 月,检索了 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science。主要结局指标是总染色体异常和新发异常(包括性染色体异常和常染色体异常)。次要结局是遗传异常。我们遵循 PRISMA 指南,并进行了相关的荟萃分析。

结果

搜索共包括 4648 篇文章,其中 27 篇符合纳入标准,19 篇纳入定量综合分析(荟萃分析)。染色体异常的发生率在研究之间差异很大,这可能是由于样本量和患者人口统计学的巨大差异所致。只有五项研究有资格进行基于调整数据的汇总分析。所有研究都具有关键的偏倚风险。基于调整后数据的汇总分析结果表明,与标准 IVF(aOR 0.75(95%CI 0.41-1.38))或 NC(aOR 1.29(95%CI 0.69-2.43))相比,ICSI 并没有增加染色体异常的风险。相比之下,基于未调整数据的荟萃分析表明,与标准 IVF(OR 1.42(95%CI 1.09-1.85))和 NC(OR 2.46(95%CI 1.52-3.99))相比,ICSI 增加了染色体异常的风险,与 NC 相比,ICSI 还增加了新发异常的风险(OR 2.62(95%CI 2.07-3.31))。然而,由于证据的确定性非常低,仍然可以得出结论,没有发现 ICSI 后代染色体异常风险增加的迹象。如果 ICSI 后代中确实存在染色体异常的风险增加,那么绝对风险仍然很小。

意义

本综述提供了 ICSI 与后代染色体异常之间关系的现有证据的广泛概述。我们强调需要进行精心设计的大型前瞻性对照研究,并进行系统的细胞遗传学检测。现有的数据是有限的,在许多情况下,都存在严重的偏倚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验