Gudjonsson G H
Institute of Psychiatry, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;27(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00764.x.
This paper attempts to investigate empirically in 30 subjects some of the theoretical components related to individual differences that are thought by Gudjonsson & Clark (1986) to mediate interrogative suggestibility as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1984a). The variables studied were: assertiveness, social-evaluative anxiety, state anxiety and the coping methods subjects are able to generate and implement during interrogation. Low assertiveness and high evaluative anxiety were found to correlate moderately with suggestibility, but no significant correlations emerged for 'social avoidance and distress'. State anxiety correlated significantly with suggestibility, particularly after negative feedback had been administered. Coping methods (active-cognitive/behavioural vs. avoidance) significantly predicted suggestibility scores. The findings give strong support to the theoretical model of Gudjonsson & Clark.
本文试图对30名受试者进行实证研究,探究一些与个体差异相关的理论成分,古德扬松和克拉克(1986)认为这些成分在古德扬松易受暗示性量表(GSS;古德扬松,1984a)所测量的讯问易受暗示性中起中介作用。所研究的变量包括:自信、社会评价焦虑、状态焦虑以及受试者在讯问过程中能够产生并运用的应对方式。研究发现,低自信和高评价焦虑与易受暗示性存在中度相关性,但“社交回避与痛苦”方面未出现显著相关性。状态焦虑与易受暗示性显著相关,尤其是在给予负面反馈之后。应对方式(积极认知/行为与回避)显著预测了易受暗示性得分。这些研究结果为古德扬松和克拉克的理论模型提供了有力支持。