Mytilekas Konstantinos-Vaios, Oeconomou Athanasios, Sokolakis Ioannis, Kalaitzi Marina, Mouzakitis George, Nakopoulou Evangelia, Apostolidis Apostolos
2nd Department of Urology of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larisa, Larisa, Greece.
Int Neurourol J. 2021 Sep;25(3):244-251. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040342.171. Epub 2021 May 6.
We aimed to develop urodynamic criteria to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and detrusor underactivity (DU) in women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
Initially, in a group of 68 consecutive women with LUTS and increased postvoid residual (PVR) who had undergone urodynamic investigations, we examined the level of agreement between the operating physician's diagnosis of BOO or DU and the diagnosis according to urodynamic nomograms/indices, including the Blaivas-Groutz (B-G) nomogram, urethral resistance factor (URA), bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI), and bladder contractility index (BCI). Based on the initial results, we categorized 160 women into 4 groups using the B-G nomogram and URA (group 1, severe-moderate BOO; group 2, mild BOO and URA≥20; group 3, mild BOO and URA<20; group 4, nonobstructed) and compared the urodynamic parameters. Finally, we redefined women as obstructed (groups 1+2) and nonobstructed (groups 3+4) for subanalysis.
The agreement between the B-G nomogram and physician's diagnosis was poor in the mild obstruction zone (κ=0.308, P=0.01). By adding URA (cutoff value=20), excellent agreement was reached (κ=0.856, P<0.001). Statistically significant differences were found among the 4 groups (analysis of variance) in maximum flow rate (Qmax) (P<0.0001), voided volume (VV) (P=0.042), PVR (P=0.032), BOOI (P<0.0001), and BCI (P<0.0001), with a positive linear trend for Qmax and VV and a negative linear trend for PVR and BOOI moving from groups 1 to 4. In the subanalysis, all parameters showed statistically significant differences between obstructed and nonobstructed women, except BCI (Qmax, P=0.0001; VV, P=0.0091; PVR, P=0.0005; BOOI, P=0.0001).
The combination of the B-G nomogram with URA increased the accuracy of diagnosing BOO among women with LUTS. Based on this combination, most women in the mild obstruction zone of the B-G nomogram would be considered underactive rather than obstructed.
我们旨在制定尿动力学标准,以提高下尿路症状(LUTS)女性膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)和逼尿肌活动减退(DU)诊断的准确性。
最初,在一组68例连续的有LUTS且残余尿量(PVR)增加并接受尿动力学检查的女性中,我们检查了手术医生对BOO或DU的诊断与根据尿动力学列线图/指标(包括布莱瓦斯-格劳茨(B-G)列线图、尿道阻力因子(URA)、膀胱出口梗阻指数(BOOI)和膀胱收缩力指数(BCI))做出的诊断之间的一致性水平。基于初始结果,我们使用B-G列线图和URA将160名女性分为4组(第1组,重度-中度BOO;第2组,轻度BOO且URA≥20;第3组,轻度BOO且URA<20;第4组,无梗阻)并比较尿动力学参数。最后,我们重新将女性定义为梗阻组(第1组+第2组)和非梗阻组(第3组+第4组)进行亚组分析。
在轻度梗阻区域,B-G列线图与医生诊断之间的一致性较差(κ=0.308,P=0.01)。通过加入URA(临界值=20),达成了极佳的一致性(κ=0.856,P<0.001)。在最大尿流率(Qmax)(P<0.0001)、排尿量(VV)(P=0.042)、PVR(P=0.032)、BOOI(P<0.0001)和BCI(P<0.0001)方面,4组之间存在统计学显著差异(方差分析),从第1组到第4组,Qmax和VV呈正线性趋势,PVR和BOOI呈负线性趋势。在亚组分析中,除BCI外,所有参数在梗阻和非梗阻女性之间均显示出统计学显著差异(Qmax,P=0.0001;VV,P=0.0091;PVR,P=0.0005;BOOI,P=0.0001)。
B-G列线图与URA的组合提高了LUTS女性中BOO诊断的准确性。基于这种组合,B-G列线图轻度梗阻区域的大多数女性将被认为是活动减退而非梗阻。