Service of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Regional Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain .
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 May 1;38(3):166-170. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000734.
Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) can be used to assess the integrity of the descending corticospinal tract in the laboratory. Evoked potentials (EPs) have been widely used in the past for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), but they are now becoming more useful in assessing the prognosis of the disease. Motor-evoked potentials have been included in EP scales that have demonstrated good correlations with clinical disability. Soon after the onset of MS, it is possible to detect an ongoing process of neurodegeneration and axonal loss. Axonal loss is probably responsible for the disability and disease progression that occurs in MS. Given the good correlations of EPs in detecting disease progression in MS, they have been used to monitor the effects of drugs used to treat the disease. Several clinical trials used MEPs as part of their EP evaluation, but MEPs have never been used as a measure of efficacy in clinical trials testing neuroprotective agents, although MEPs could be a very promising tool to measure neuroprotection and remyelination resulting from these drugs. To be used in multicenter clinical trials, MEP readings should be comparable between centers. Standardized multicenter EP assessment with central reading has been demonstrated to be feasible and reliable. Although MEP measurements have been correlated with clinical scores and other measures of neurodegeneration, further validation of MEP amplitude measurements is needed regarding their validity, reliability, and sensitivity before they can be routinely used in clinical drug trials in MS.
运动诱发电位 (MEPs) 可用于评估实验室中下行皮质脊髓束的完整性。诱发电位 (EPs) 在过去曾广泛用于多发性硬化症 (MS) 的诊断,但现在在评估疾病预后方面变得更加有用。运动诱发电位已被纳入 EP 量表,这些量表已证明与临床残疾具有良好的相关性。在 MS 发病后不久,就有可能检测到神经退行性变和轴突丢失的持续过程。轴突丢失可能是 MS 中发生残疾和疾病进展的原因。鉴于 EPs 在检测 MS 疾病进展方面的良好相关性,它们已被用于监测用于治疗该疾病的药物的效果。几项临床试验将 MEPs 用作其 EP 评估的一部分,但 MEPs 从未被用作临床试验中测试神经保护剂的疗效的衡量标准,尽管 MEPs 可能是衡量这些药物引起的神经保护和髓鞘再生的非常有前途的工具。为了在多中心临床试验中使用,中心之间的 MEP 读数应该具有可比性。已经证明,具有中心阅读的标准化多中心 EP 评估是可行且可靠的。尽管 MEP 测量值与临床评分和其他神经退行性变测量值相关,但在它们可以在 MS 的常规临床药物试验中常规使用之前,需要进一步验证 MEP 幅度测量值的有效性、可靠性和敏感性。