Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后胃食管静脉曲张无创评估中脾脏硬度的表现。

Spleen Stiffness Performance in the Noninvasive Assessment of Gastroesophageal Varices after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasonic Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China 710032.

Department of Liver Disease and Digestive Interventional Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China 710032.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Apr 17;2021:5530004. doi: 10.1155/2021/5530004. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the performance of spleen stiffness (SS) by using two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) for assessing the severity of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

METHODS

102 eligible patients were categorized as in the post-TIPS short-term ( = 69) and long-term ( = 38) follow-up groups. The performance of SS by using 2D-SWE for evaluating the severity of GEVs was compared with liver stiffness (LS), spleen stiffness-to-liver stiffness ratio (SS/LS), liver stiffness spleen-diameter-to-platelet-ratio score (LSPS), portal hypertension (PH) risk score, platelet count-to-spleen diameter ratio (PSR), and varices risk score by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and DeLong test.

RESULTS

In the post-TIPS short-term follow-up group, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of SS were 0.585 for mild (cutoff value = 30.3 kPa), 0.655 for moderate (cutoff value = 30.6 kPa), and 0.739 for severe (cutoff value = 31.9 kPa) GEVs, which were higher than other parameters for severe GEVs. AUCs of SS were lower than other parameters for mild and moderate GEVs, but no difference was found ( > 0.05). In the post-TIPS long-term follow-up group, AUCs of SS were 0.778 for mild (cutoff value = 28.9 kPa), 0.82 for moderate (cutoff value = 29.9 kPa), and 0.824 for severe (cutoff value = 37.7 kPa) GEVs, which were higher than other parameters except for severe GEVs. AUC of SS was lower than other parameters for severe GEVs, but no significant difference was found ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SS is an effective noninvasive tool to predict GEV severity during the post-TIPS follow-up.

摘要

目的

使用二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后胃食管静脉曲张(GEV)的严重程度,探讨脾脏硬度(SS)的性能。

方法

102 例符合条件的患者分为 TIPS 后短期(n=69)和长期(n=38)随访组。比较 2D-SWE 评估 GEV 严重程度的 SS 与肝硬度(LS)、脾脏硬度与肝硬度比值(SS/LS)、肝硬度脾脏直径与血小板比值评分(LSPS)、门静脉高压(PH)风险评分、血小板计数与脾脏直径比值(PSR)和静脉曲张风险评分的性能,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和 DeLong 检验。

结果

在 TIPS 后短期随访组中,SS 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为轻度(截断值=30.3 kPa)、中度(截断值=30.6 kPa)和重度(截断值=31.9 kPa)的 0.585、0.655 和 0.739,对于重度 GEVs,这些值均高于其他参数。对于轻度和中度 GEVs,SS 的 AUC 低于其他参数,但差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。在 TIPS 后长期随访组中,SS 的 AUC 分别为轻度(截断值=28.9 kPa)、中度(截断值=29.9 kPa)和重度(截断值=37.7 kPa)的 0.778、0.82 和 0.824,对于重度 GEVs,这些值均高于其他参数,除了重度 GEVs。对于重度 GEVs,SS 的 AUC 低于其他参数,但差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

SS 是 TIPS 后随访中预测 GEV 严重程度的一种有效无创工具。

相似文献

3
The Role of Spleen and Liver Elastography and Color-Doppler Ultrasound in the Assessment of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Function.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1641-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 8.
4
Spleen stiffness in patients with cirrhosis in predicting esophageal varices.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;108(7):1101-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.119. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
6
Association of splenic MR elastographic findings with gastroesophageal varices in patients with chronic liver disease.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;41(1):117-24. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24505. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Shear Wave Elastography for Predicting Esophageal Varices in Patients With Compensated Liver Cirrhosis.
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Jul;35(7):1373-81. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.07024. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
A study on spleen transient elastography in predicting the degree of esophageal varices and bleeding.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(9):e14615. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014615.

引用本文的文献

3
Spleen Stiffness: The "New Kid on the Block" in the Diagnosis of Clinical Significant Portal Hypertension.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 May-Jun;13(3):385-386. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Application of Ultrasound Elastography in Assessing Portal Hypertension.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 29;12(10):2373. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102373.

本文引用的文献

1
Spleen stiffness to liver stiffness ratio significantly differs between ALD and HCV and predicts disease-specific complications.
JHEP Rep. 2019 Jun 21;1(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.05.003. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Normal Liver Stiffness Values in Children: A Comparison of Three Different Elastography Methods.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 May;68(5):706-712. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002320.
9
Association between non-variceal spontaneous portosystemic shunt and outcomes after TIPS in cirrhosis.
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Dec;50(12):1315-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验