Gull B, Klerelid V, Jormeus A, Strandell A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.
Department of Gynecology, Närhälsan Kungshöjd, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 May 1;2021(2):hoab019. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab019. eCollection 2021.
What are the important risk factors for having a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)?
Independent risk factors were smoking in the first trimester, higher parity, and previous caesarean section (CS) before the index caesarean delivery.
A spectrum of risk factors for CSP has been suggested but not proven: parity, number of previous caesarean section, elective as opposed to emergency CS, IVF-pregnancy, breech presentation, previous gynaecological surgery as well as suture technique.
This retrospective case-control study included 31 women with a CSP during the period 2003-2018 treated at a tertiary care centre for gynaecology and reproduction. A control cohort of 8300 women with a history of a CS and a subsequent delivery during the same time period was formed.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Variables describing demography, lifestyle factors, and reproductive and obstetric history were retrieved from medical records and the obstetric hospital database. Logistic regression analyses were applied to identify potential risk factors.
In a multivariable analysis, smoking in first trimester (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.03, 95% CI 1.01-9.07), higher parity (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.64) and previous CS in addition to the preceding CS (adjusted OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.35-8.66) were independently predictive of a CSP. An elective CS at the index pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of CSP but did not remain significant in the multivariable analysis.
CSP is a very rare phenomenon and several of the risk factor estimates are imprecise. Nevertheless, significant risk factors could be identified. Another limitation is the lack of electronically recorded details on suture techniques.
The identified factors, namely higher parity and previous CS before the index caesarean section, are in accordance with previously suggested risk factors. Whether there is a true risk association between elective CS and future CSP needs to be investigated further. Smoking in the first trimester is a new finding, which has a plausible rationale. These factors should be recognised when counselling women after a caesarean delivery, particularly in a subsequent pregnancy with early complications.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-720291). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的重要危险因素有哪些?
独立危险因素为孕早期吸烟、较高的产次以及本次剖宫产之前有过剖宫产史。
已有一系列关于CSP的危险因素被提出,但尚未得到证实,包括产次、既往剖宫产次数、择期剖宫产与急诊剖宫产、体外受精妊娠、臀位、既往妇科手术以及缝合技术。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项回顾性病例对照研究纳入了2003年至2018年期间在一家三级妇科和生殖保健中心接受治疗的31例CSP女性。同时建立了一个由8300例有剖宫产史且在同一时期随后分娩的女性组成的对照队列。
研究对象/材料、环境、方法:从病历和产科医院数据库中获取描述人口统计学、生活方式因素以及生殖和产科病史的变量。应用逻辑回归分析来识别潜在危险因素。
在多变量分析中,孕早期吸烟(调整后的优势比(OR)为3.03,95%置信区间为1.01 - 9.07)、较高产次(调整后的OR为1.30,95%置信区间为1.03 - 1.64)以及本次剖宫产之前有过剖宫产史(调整后的OR为3.43,95%置信区间为1.35 - 8.66)是CSP的独立预测因素。本次妊娠为择期剖宫产与CSP风险增加相关,但在多变量分析中未保持显著。
局限性、谨慎的原因:CSP是一种非常罕见的现象,一些危险因素的估计并不精确。尽管如此,仍可识别出显著的危险因素。另一个局限性是缺乏关于缝合技术的电子记录细节。
所确定的因素,即较高产次和本次剖宫产之前有过剖宫产史,与先前提出的危险因素一致。择期剖宫产与未来CSP之间是否存在真正的风险关联需要进一步研究。孕早期吸烟是一项新发现,其有合理的理论依据。在剖宫产术后为女性提供咨询时,尤其是在后续妊娠出现早期并发症时,应认识到这些因素。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项工作得到了瑞典政府与郡议会之间协议下瑞典国家的一项拨款支持(ALF协议,ALFGBG - 720291)。作者均无利益冲突需要声明。