Suppr超能文献

新型药物洗脱支架置入后非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 PCI 前 TIMI 血流分级和再灌注时间与两年临床结局的关系。

Two-Year Clinical Outcomes According to Pre-PCI TIMI Flow Grade and Reperfusion Timing in Non-STEMI After Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Angiology. 2022 Feb;73(2):152-164. doi: 10.1177/00033197211012537. Epub 2021 May 7.

Abstract

The 2-year clinical outcomes according to pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and reperfusion timing were investigated in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who received newer-generation drug-eluting stents. A total of 7506 NSTEMI patients were divided into 2 groups: early (PCI ≤ 24 hours: n = 6398; pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 [n = 2729], pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 [n = 3669]) and delayed (PCI > 24 hours: n = 1108; pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 [n = 428], pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 [n = 680]) invasive groups. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization. All-cause death ( = 0.005 and 0.009, respectively) and cardiac death ( = .003 and 0.046, respectively) were significantly higher in pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 patients than in pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 patients both in the early and delayed invasive groups. In pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 patients, all-cause death rate was significantly higher in the delayed group ( = .023). In pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 patients, the clinical end point was similar between the 2 groups. An early invasive strategy is preferred to a delayed invasive strategy in reducing all-cause death in patients with pre-PCI TIMI 0/1. However, in patients with pre-PCI TIMI 2/3, both treatment strategies are acceptable.

摘要

这项研究旨在探讨接受新一代药物洗脱支架治疗的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者,根据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)前的血栓溶解心肌梗死(TIMI)血流分级和再灌注时间的 2 年临床结果。共纳入 7506 例 NSTEMI 患者,分为 2 组:早期(PCI ≤ 24 小时:n = 6398;PCI 前 TIMI 0/1 [n = 2729],PCI 前 TIMI 2/3 [n = 3669])和延迟(PCI > 24 小时:n = 1108;PCI 前 TIMI 0/1 [n = 428],PCI 前 TIMI 2/3 [n = 680])侵入组。主要不良心脏事件定义为全因死亡、再发心肌梗死或任何再次血运重建。所有原因死亡(分别为 = 0.005 和 0.009)和心脏性死亡(分别为 = 0.003 和 0.046)在 PCI 前 TIMI 0/1 患者中均显著高于 PCI 前 TIMI 2/3 患者,且在早期和延迟侵入组中均如此。在 PCI 前 TIMI 0/1 患者中,延迟组的全因死亡率显著升高(= 0.023)。在 PCI 前 TIMI 2/3 患者中,两组间临床终点相似。在 PCI 前 TIMI 0/1 患者中,早期侵入策略优于延迟侵入策略,可降低全因死亡率。然而,对于 PCI 前 TIMI 2/3 患者,两种治疗策略均是可接受的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验