Kim Yong Hoon, Her Ae-Young, Jeong Myung Ho, Kim Byeong-Keuk, Hong Sung-Jin, Kim Seunghwan, Ahn Chul-Min, Kim Jung-Sun, Ko Young-Guk, Choi Donghoon, Hong Myeong-Ki, Jang Yangsoo
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, 156 Baengnyeong Road, Chuncheon 24289, Korea.
Cardiovascular Center, Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 19;10(2):367. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020367.
This study aims to investigate the two-year clinical outcomes between first-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) drug-eluting stents (DES) based on pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade (pre-TIMI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Overall, 17,891 STEMI patients were classified into two groups: pre-TIMI 0/1 group ( = 12,862; 1G-DES ( = 4318), 2G-DES ( = 8544)) and pre-TIMI 2/3 group ( = 5029; 1G-DES ( = 2046), 2G-DES ( = 2983)). During a two-year follow-up period, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), or any repeat revascularization and stent thrombosis (ST) were considered as the primary and the secondary outcomes. In the pre-TIMI 0/1 and 2/3 groups, the cumulative incidences of MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.348, < 0.001, and aHR: 1.415, = 0.02, respectively) and any repeat revascularization (aHR: 1.938, < 0.001, and aHR: 1.674, = 0.001, respectively) were significantly higher in the 1G-DES than in the 2G-DES. However, sirolimus-eluting stent showed similar cumulative incidence of any repeat revascularization compared with zotarolimus-eluting stent and biolimus-eluting stent in both pre-TIMI 0/1 and 2/3 groups. The cumulative incidences of all-cause death, re-MI, and ST were similar between the 1G-DES and 2G-DES groups. In this study, 2G-DES showed better clinical outcomes than 1G-DES concerning MACEs and any repeat revascularization regardless of pre-TIMI. However, more research is needed to support these results.
本研究旨在基于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)前的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流分级(术前TIMI),调查第一代(1G)和第二代(2G)药物洗脱支架(DES)的两年临床结局。总体而言,17891例STEMI患者被分为两组:术前TIMI 0/1组(n = 12862;1G-DES(n = 4318),2G-DES(n = 8544))和术前TIMI 2/3组(n = 5029;1G-DES(n = 2046),2G-DES(n = 2983))。在两年的随访期内,主要不良心脏事件(MACE)定义为全因死亡、再发心肌梗死(再梗死)或任何再次血运重建及支架血栓形成(ST),被视为主要和次要结局。在术前TIMI 0/1组和2/3组中,1G-DES的MACE累积发生率(调整后风险比(aHR):分别为1.348,P < 0.001和aHR:1.415,P = 0.02)和任何再次血运重建的累积发生率(aHR:分别为1.938,P < 0.001和aHR:1.674,P = 0.001)均显著高于2G-DES。然而,在术前TIMI 0/1组和2/3组中,西罗莫司洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架和生物可吸收涂层依维莫司洗脱支架相比,任何再次血运重建的累积发生率相似。1G-DES组和2G-DES组之间全因死亡、再梗死和ST的累积发生率相似。在本研究中,无论术前TIMI如何,2G-DES在MACE和任何再次血运重建方面均显示出比1G-DES更好的临床结局。然而,需要更多研究来支持这些结果。