Anadolu University.
J Gen Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;149(4):524-549. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2021.1922342. Epub 2021 May 7.
Although previous research has identified that perfectionism is associated with both narcissism and workaholism, research into the specific roles of potential perfectionism classes in these personality dynamics is currently unavailable. Furthermore, no study has investigated if the "useless superiority effort" dimension of inferiority feelings, which indicates an increased need for superiority over others potentially to overcome self-perceived inferiorities, is related to other important personality dynamics. This study was therefore conducted to identify if potential perfectionism classes that exist among academicians ( = 317) can simultaneously explain significant differences in their tendencies toward workaholism, narcissism, and useless superiority effort, after controlling for potential social desirability effect. A latent class analysis of two dimensions of perfectionism (discrepancy and high standards) revealed four distinct classes of academicians; non-perfectionists (NONPs; 20%), maladaptive perfectionists (MPs; 17%), normal perfectionists (NPs; 44%) and adaptive perfectionists (APs; 19%). Further analysis (MANCOVA) showed that while MPs have the highest tendencies toward workaholism and useless superiority effort, NONPs have the lowest tendencies toward these. Moreover, APs reported significantly lower useless superiority than NPs, despite scoring similarly on both narcissism and workaholism. Additionally, based on workaholism being related to narcissism, high standards and discrepancy dimensions of perfectionism, as well as useless superiority effort, while weekly work hours are not, it can be suggested that workaholism is qualitatively different from working long hours.
尽管先前的研究已经确定完美主义与自恋和工作狂有关,但目前还没有研究探讨潜在的完美主义类型在这些人格动态中的具体作用。此外,尚无研究调查自卑感的“无用优越感努力”维度是否与其他重要的人格动态有关,而自卑感表明需要通过超越他人来获得优越感,以潜在地克服自我认知的劣势。因此,本研究旨在确定在控制潜在的社会期望效应后,存在于学者中的潜在完美主义类型( = 317)是否可以同时解释他们的工作狂、自恋和无用优越感努力倾向的显著差异。对完美主义的两个维度(差异和高标准)进行潜在类别分析,揭示了学者中的四个不同类别;非完美主义者(NONPs;20%)、适应不良的完美主义者(MPs;17%)、正常完美主义者(NPs;44%)和适应良好的完美主义者(APs;19%)。进一步的分析(MANCOVA)表明,尽管 MPs 在工作狂和无用的优越感努力方面的倾向最高,但 NONPs 在这些方面的倾向最低。此外,尽管 APs 在自恋和工作狂方面的得分与 NPs 相似,但 APs 报告的无用优越感明显低于 NPs。此外,基于工作狂与自恋、高标准和差异维度的完美主义以及无用的优越感努力有关,而每周工作时间无关,因此可以认为工作狂在质上与长时间工作不同。