• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to learn the International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) content: Self-study through booklet is not enough.如何学习脊髓损伤后自主功能残损评定国际标准(ISAFSCI)内容:单纯通过手册自学是不够的。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Nov;45(6):874-881. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1918978. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Construct validity of the international standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury (ISAFSCI) (1st edition).脊髓损伤后自主神经功能国际标准文档(ISAFSCI)(第一版)的结构效度。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Dec;61(12):644-651. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00932-z. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Inter-Rater Reliability of the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤后记录残余自主神经功能的国际标准的评分者间信度
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb;34(3):552-558. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4489. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
An evaluation of the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury: input from the international community.脊髓损伤后记录残余自主神经功能的国际标准评估:来自国际社会的意见
Spinal Cord. 2017 Feb;55(2):198-203. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.152. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury.记录脊髓损伤后剩余自主功能的国际标准。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Jul;35(4):201-10. doi: 10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000053.
6
What should be clarified when learning the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) among medical students.医学生在学习脊髓损伤后记录残余自主功能的国际标准(ISAFSCI)时应明确哪些内容。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2021 Jul 31;7(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s41394-021-00431-4.
7
Pulse article: Survey on the current usage of the International Standards for the Assessment of Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI).《脉搏》文章:脊髓损伤后自主神经功能评估国际标准(ISAFSCI)当前使用情况调查。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017 Dec 20;3:17100. doi: 10.1038/s41394-017-0025-8. eCollection 2017.
8
Evaluation of Cardiovascular Autonomic Function during Inpatient Rehabilitation following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.创伤性脊髓损伤住院康复期间心血管自主功能评估。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Dec;39(23-24):1636-1644. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0379. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
9
Assessing the ability of the Sacral Autonomic Standards to document bladder and bowel function based upon the Asia Impairment Scale.基于亚洲损伤量表评估骶神经自主标准记录膀胱和肠道功能的能力。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019 Oct 18;5:85. doi: 10.1038/s41394-019-0228-2. eCollection 2019.
10
[Spanish validation of the Autonomic Standards Assessment Form in spinal cord injuries].[《自主神经标准评估表》在脊髓损伤中的西班牙文验证]
Rehabilitacion (Madr). 2019 Jan-Mar;53(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rh.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Pulse article: Survey on the current usage of the International Standards for the Assessment of Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI).《脉搏》文章:脊髓损伤后自主神经功能评估国际标准(ISAFSCI)当前使用情况调查。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017 Dec 20;3:17100. doi: 10.1038/s41394-017-0025-8. eCollection 2017.
2
An evaluation of the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury: input from the international community.脊髓损伤后记录残余自主神经功能的国际标准评估:来自国际社会的意见
Spinal Cord. 2017 Feb;55(2):198-203. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.152. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
3
Inter-Rater Reliability of the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤后记录残余自主神经功能的国际标准的评分者间信度
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb;34(3):552-558. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4489. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
Assessment of clinical adherence to the international autonomic standards following spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后临床对国际自主神经标准依从性的评估。
Spinal Cord. 2015 Sep;53(9):668-72. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.54. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
The influence of question design on the response to self-assessment in www.elearnSCI.org: a submodule pilot study.问题设计对www.elearnSCI.org上自我评估回复的影响:一项子模块试点研究
Spinal Cord. 2015 Aug;53(8):604-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.226. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
6
Feasibility of using training cases from International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set for testing of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury items.使用国际脊髓损伤核心数据集的训练病例来测试脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准项目的可行性。
Spinal Cord. 2014 Dec;52(12):919-22. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.141. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
7
Training effectiveness when teaching the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) to medical students.医学留学生脊髓损伤国际神经分类标准(ISNCSCI)教学培训效果
Spinal Cord. 2013 Oct;51(10):768-71. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.75. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
8
Effect of formal training in scaling, scoring and classification of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤国际神经分类标准的刮除、评分和分类正式培训的效果。
Spinal Cord. 2013 Apr;51(4):282-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.149. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
9
International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury.记录脊髓损伤后剩余自主功能的国际标准。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Jul;35(4):201-10. doi: 10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000053.
10
Introducing the revised International Standards on documentation of remaining Autonomic Function after SCI (ISAFSCI).介绍修订后的《脊髓损伤后残余自主神经功能记录国际标准》(ISAFSCI)。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Jul;35(4):200. doi: 10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000054.

如何学习脊髓损伤后自主功能残损评定国际标准(ISAFSCI)内容:单纯通过手册自学是不够的。

How to learn the International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) content: Self-study through booklet is not enough.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, GF Strong Rehabilitation Center, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Nov;45(6):874-881. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1918978. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1080/10790268.2021.1918978
PMID:33960871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9662037/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the baseline knowledge of autonomic functions and specifically the International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) among medical students and to present the effective methods in learning of the ISAFSCI.

DESIGN

Interventional training session.

SETTING

A tertiary hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

37 medical students.

INTERVENTIONS

Before training, a self-rating questionnaire including 24 concepts extracted from the ISAFSCI was administrated to the students. Then students were divided into two groups. One group (= 19) had a one-hour ISAFSCI booklet self-study (BSS), while the other group (= 18) received a one-hour lecture-based learning (LBL) about the ISAFSCI. After BSS/LBL, all students were examined by a 15-question written test on the knowledge of ISAFSCI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline knowledge self-rating questionnaire before training and comparison of post-training performance on the written test between the BSS and LBL groups.

RESULTS

Before training, students were familiar with only 8 out of the 24 concepts within the questionnaire (demonstrating baseline knowledge rate beyond 50%). Significant difference in post-training performance (P<0.05) between BBS and LBL groups was noted for 5 of 15 items tested, including hypohydrosis, broncho-pulmonary system, lower urinary tract function, bowel function and female sexual function. All questions except the one regarding hypohydrosis were answered with greater than 80% accuracy by LBL group.

CONCLUSION

Use of ISAFSCI booklet alone for self-study by medical students is not sufficient to obtain bassline knowledge of autonomic discussions after SCI. It is recommended that formal lecture or presentation should be used to improve the effectiveness of learning the ISAFSCI for medical students.

摘要

目的

调查医学生自主功能的基础知识,特别是脊髓损伤后自主功能国际标准(ISAFSCI)的记录,并介绍学习 ISAFSCI 的有效方法。

设计

干预性培训课程。

地点

一家三级医院。

参与者

37 名医学生。

干预措施

在培训前,学生们填写了一份自我评估问卷,其中包含 24 个从 ISAFSCI 中提取的概念。然后,学生被分为两组。一组(n=19)进行了一个小时的 ISAFSCI 手册自学(BSS),而另一组(n=18)接受了一个小时的 ISAFSCI 基于讲座的学习(LBL)。在 BSS/LBL 之后,所有学生都接受了一份关于 ISAFSCI 知识的 15 个问题的书面测试。

主要观察指标

培训前的基础知识自我评估问卷和 BSS/LBL 两组学生书面测试后的表现比较。

结果

在培训前,学生们仅熟悉问卷中的 24 个概念中的 8 个(表明基础知识率超过 50%)。在测试的 15 个项目中,BSS 和 LBL 两组之间有 5 个项目的培训后表现存在显著差异(P<0.05),包括少汗症、支气管-肺系统、下尿路功能、肠道功能和女性性功能。除了与少汗症相关的问题外,LBL 组对其他所有问题的回答准确率都超过了 80%。

结论

医学生单独使用 ISAFSCI 手册进行自学不足以获得 SCI 后自主功能讨论的基础知识。建议使用正式的讲座或演示来提高医学生学习 ISAFSCI 的效果。