Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, GF Strong Rehabilitation Center, Vancouver, Canada.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Nov;45(6):874-881. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1918978. Epub 2021 May 7.
To investigate the baseline knowledge of autonomic functions and specifically the International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) among medical students and to present the effective methods in learning of the ISAFSCI.
Interventional training session.
A tertiary hospital.
37 medical students.
Before training, a self-rating questionnaire including 24 concepts extracted from the ISAFSCI was administrated to the students. Then students were divided into two groups. One group (= 19) had a one-hour ISAFSCI booklet self-study (BSS), while the other group (= 18) received a one-hour lecture-based learning (LBL) about the ISAFSCI. After BSS/LBL, all students were examined by a 15-question written test on the knowledge of ISAFSCI.
Baseline knowledge self-rating questionnaire before training and comparison of post-training performance on the written test between the BSS and LBL groups.
Before training, students were familiar with only 8 out of the 24 concepts within the questionnaire (demonstrating baseline knowledge rate beyond 50%). Significant difference in post-training performance (P<0.05) between BBS and LBL groups was noted for 5 of 15 items tested, including hypohydrosis, broncho-pulmonary system, lower urinary tract function, bowel function and female sexual function. All questions except the one regarding hypohydrosis were answered with greater than 80% accuracy by LBL group.
Use of ISAFSCI booklet alone for self-study by medical students is not sufficient to obtain bassline knowledge of autonomic discussions after SCI. It is recommended that formal lecture or presentation should be used to improve the effectiveness of learning the ISAFSCI for medical students.
调查医学生自主功能的基础知识,特别是脊髓损伤后自主功能国际标准(ISAFSCI)的记录,并介绍学习 ISAFSCI 的有效方法。
干预性培训课程。
一家三级医院。
37 名医学生。
在培训前,学生们填写了一份自我评估问卷,其中包含 24 个从 ISAFSCI 中提取的概念。然后,学生被分为两组。一组(n=19)进行了一个小时的 ISAFSCI 手册自学(BSS),而另一组(n=18)接受了一个小时的 ISAFSCI 基于讲座的学习(LBL)。在 BSS/LBL 之后,所有学生都接受了一份关于 ISAFSCI 知识的 15 个问题的书面测试。
培训前的基础知识自我评估问卷和 BSS/LBL 两组学生书面测试后的表现比较。
在培训前,学生们仅熟悉问卷中的 24 个概念中的 8 个(表明基础知识率超过 50%)。在测试的 15 个项目中,BSS 和 LBL 两组之间有 5 个项目的培训后表现存在显著差异(P<0.05),包括少汗症、支气管-肺系统、下尿路功能、肠道功能和女性性功能。除了与少汗症相关的问题外,LBL 组对其他所有问题的回答准确率都超过了 80%。
医学生单独使用 ISAFSCI 手册进行自学不足以获得 SCI 后自主功能讨论的基础知识。建议使用正式的讲座或演示来提高医学生学习 ISAFSCI 的效果。