Lorell B H, Isoyama S, Grice W N, Weinberg E O, Apstein C S
Cardiac Muscle Research Laboratory, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts.
Circ Res. 1988 Aug;63(2):457-67. doi: 10.1161/01.res.63.2.457.
Myocardial ischemia causes both systolic and diastolic dysfunction. A variety of positive inotropic agents with different subcellular mechanisms may be used clinically in an attempt to reverse ischemic contractile failure. We tested the hypothesis that two inotropic agents, isoproterenol (a beta-adrenergic agonist) and ouabain (a sodium pump inhibitor), might have different effects on left ventricular (LV) diastolic function during ischemic failure despite an equivalent inotropic effect. Isolated isovolumic (balloon-in-LV) blood perfused rabbit hearts were paced at constant physiological heart rate (4 Hz), given either no drug (controls, n = 7), isoproterenol (n = 7), or ouabain (n = 7), and then subjected to 6 minutes of low flow ischemia (75% reduction of baseline coronary flow). The doses of isoproterenol and ouabain were selected to produce equivalent modest inotropic effects (15% increase in LV + dP/dt) in each heart during baseline perfusion conditions. During the ischemic period, there was a marked decrease in contractility, and neither isoproterenol nor ouabain demonstrated a positive inotropic effect relative to the control group. However, these agents had markedly different effects on diastolic chamber distensibility (assessed by end-diastolic pressure at constant LV volume) during ischemia. In the control and isoproterenol groups, diastolic chamber distensibility did not change during the ischemic period. In contrast, ouabain treatment resulted in a marked decrease in diastolic chamber distensibility during ischemia; this change was not completely reversible during the 10-minute reperfusion period. The mechanism by which ouabain decreased diastolic chamber distensibility relative to isoproterenol was assessed indirectly. The ouabain and isoproterenol groups were subjected to equivalent degrees of ischemia as assessed by oxygen supply/demand imbalance; during ischemia, each drug group did not differ with regard to myocardial perfusion rates, determinants of myocardial oxygen demand (heart rate, LV developed pressure, LV + dP/dt), myocardial oxygen consumption, lactate production, and ATP and creatine phosphate content. We therefore inferred that the greater decrease in diastolic distensibility in the ouabain group was not due to a greater metabolic severity of ischemia. These observations are consistent with a mechanism of cytosolic calcium overload induced by ouabain, resulting in persistent active myofilament tension development throughout diastole, to cause the observed decrease in diastolic chamber distensibility during ischemia in the ouabain group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
心肌缺血会导致收缩和舒张功能障碍。临床上可能会使用多种具有不同亚细胞机制的正性肌力药物,试图逆转缺血性收缩功能衰竭。我们检验了这样一个假设:尽管两种正性肌力药物异丙肾上腺素(一种β-肾上腺素能激动剂)和哇巴因(一种钠泵抑制剂)具有同等的正性肌力作用,但在缺血性衰竭期间,它们对左心室(LV)舒张功能可能有不同影响。对离体的等容(左心室内置球囊)血液灌注兔心脏以恒定的生理心率(4Hz)进行起搏,分别给予无药物处理(对照组,n = 7)、异丙肾上腺素(n = 7)或哇巴因(n = 7),然后进行6分钟的低流量缺血(冠状动脉血流基线减少75%)。选择异丙肾上腺素和哇巴因的剂量,使其在基线灌注条件下在每个心脏产生同等适度的正性肌力作用(左心室 + dP/dt增加15%)。在缺血期间,收缩性显著降低,相对于对照组,异丙肾上腺素和哇巴因均未表现出正性肌力作用。然而,这些药物在缺血期间对舒张期心室扩张性(通过恒定左心室容积下的舒张末期压力评估)有明显不同的影响。在对照组和异丙肾上腺素组中,缺血期间舒张期心室扩张性没有变化。相比之下,哇巴因处理导致缺血期间舒张期心室扩张性显著降低;这种变化在10分钟的再灌注期内没有完全逆转。间接评估了哇巴因相对于异丙肾上腺素降低舒张期心室扩张性的机制。通过氧供需失衡评估,哇巴因组和异丙肾上腺素组经历了同等程度的缺血;在缺血期间,每个药物组在心肌灌注率、心肌需氧量决定因素(心率、左心室舒张末压、左心室 + dP/dt)、心肌耗氧量、乳酸产生以及ATP和磷酸肌酸含量方面没有差异。因此,我们推断哇巴因组舒张期扩张性下降幅度更大并非由于缺血的代谢严重程度更高。这些观察结果与哇巴因诱导的胞质钙超载机制一致,导致整个舒张期持续产生活跃的肌丝张力,从而在哇巴因组缺血期间引起观察到的舒张期心室扩张性降低。(摘要截短至400字)