• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较传统试管法与柱凝集技术在健康个体 ABO 抗体效价滴定中的应用:来自印度的报告。

Comparative evaluation of the conventional tube test and column agglutination technology for ABO antibody titration in healthy individuals: a report from India.

机构信息

Transfusion Medicine, Tata Medical Center , 14 Middle Arterial Road (EW), Rajarhat, New Town, Kolkata 700160 , India.

Transfusion Medicine, Tata Medical Center , Kolkata , India.

出版信息

Immunohematology. 2021 Mar;37(1):25-32. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2021-006.

DOI:10.21307/immunohematology-2021-006
PMID:33962486
Abstract

Determination of accurate anti-A/-B titers is important for treatment selection in ABO-incompatible stem cell and solid-organ transplants. The standard method for ABO antibody titration is the conventional tube test (CTT). Dithiothreitol (DTT) is commonly used to inactivate the IgM antibody component. The aim of this study was to compare six different methods for ABO antibody titration and to observe the effectiveness of DTT on antibody estimation. A total of 90 healthy voluntary blood donors were enrolled in this study, including 30 each for blood groups A, B, and O. Antibody titrations were performed and tested using the CTT-immediate spin (IS), CTT-antihuman globulin (AHG) with and without DTT, column agglutination technology (CAT)-IS, and CAT-AHG with and without DTT methods. Bead-CAT was used, and the positive cutoff value was set to 1+ for each method to determine the endpoint of the titer. The median values of anti-A/-B titers by IS were found to be higher than those values by AHG in CTT and CAT among group B and A individuals, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed in values from group O individuals for IS and AHG anti-A/-B titers, estimated by each method. Although there was positive correlation between the anti-A/-B titer results obtained using the CTT and CAT in all blood groups, testing using AHG showed poor agreement with and without DTT pretreatment (kappa value of 0.11 and 0.20, respectively). Moderate agreement was observed between CTT-IS and CAT-IS (kappa value of 0.46). Median anti-A/-B AHG titers were reduced by the use of DTT in all blood group samples. Significant differences in the interpretability of anti-A/-B titers were observed among different methods. A uniform approach for selecting the method for ABO antibody titration is highly recommended, and DTT pretreatment of plasma to neutralize IgM activity should be considered to obtain precise values of IgG anti-A/-B titers. . Determination of accurate anti-A/-B titers is important for treatment selection in ABO-incompatible stem cell and solid-organ transplants. The standard method for ABO antibody titration is the conventional tube test (CTT). Dithiothreitol (DTT) is commonly used to inactivate the IgM antibody component. The aim of this study was to compare six different methods for ABO antibody titration and to observe the effectiveness of DTT on antibody estimation. A total of 90 healthy voluntary blood donors were enrolled in this study, including 30 each for blood groups A, B, and O. Antibody titrations were performed and tested using the CTT-immediate spin (IS), CTT-antihuman globulin (AHG) with and without DTT, column agglutination technology (CAT)-IS, and CAT-AHG with and without DTT methods. Bead-CAT was used, and the positive cutoff value was set to 1+ for each method to determine the endpoint of the titer. The median values of anti-A/-B titers by IS were found to be higher than those values by AHG in CTT and CAT among group B and A individuals, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed in values from group O individuals for IS and AHG anti-A/-B titers, estimated by each method. Although there was positive correlation between the anti-A/-B titer results obtained using the CTT and CAT in all blood groups, testing using AHG showed poor agreement with and without DTT pretreatment (kappa value of 0.11 and 0.20, respectively). Moderate agreement was observed between CTT-IS and CAT-IS (kappa value of 0.46). Median anti-A/-B AHG titers were reduced by the use of DTT in all blood group samples. Significant differences in the interpretability of anti-A/-B titers were observed among different methods. A uniform approach for selecting the method for ABO antibody titration is highly recommended, and DTT pretreatment of plasma to neutralize IgM activity should be considered to obtain precise values of IgG anti-A/-B titers. .

摘要

确定准确的抗 A/-B 效价对于 ABO 不相容干细胞和实体器官移植的治疗选择非常重要。ABO 抗体效价的标准方法是传统试管试验(CTT)。二硫苏糖醇(DTT)通常用于灭活 IgM 抗体成分。本研究旨在比较六种不同的 ABO 抗体效价测定方法,并观察 DTT 对抗体估计的有效性。本研究共纳入 90 名健康自愿献血者,其中 A、B 和 O 血型各 30 名。使用 CTT-即时旋转(IS)、CTT-抗人球蛋白(AHG)加和不加 DTT、柱凝集技术(CAT)-IS 和 CAT-AHG 加和不加 DTT 方法进行抗体滴定和测试。使用珠-CAT,每个方法的阳性截断值设置为 1+,以确定效价的终点。IS 测定的抗 A/-B 效价中位数高于 CTT 和 CAT 中 B 和 A 个体的 AHG 测定值,而 O 血型个体的 IS 和 AHG 抗 A/-B 效价值在每个方法中均无统计学差异。虽然所有血型中 CTT 和 CAT 获得的抗 A/-B 效价结果之间存在正相关,但使用 AHG 进行检测时,预处理和不预处理(kappa 值分别为 0.11 和 0.20)之间的一致性较差。CTT-IS 和 CAT-IS 之间观察到中度一致性(kappa 值为 0.46)。在所有血型样本中,使用 DTT 可降低抗 A/-B AHG 效价的中位数。不同方法之间观察到抗 A/-B 效价的可解释性存在显著差异。强烈建议采用统一的方法选择 ABO 抗体效价测定方法,并且应该考虑使用 DTT 预处理血浆以中和 IgM 活性,从而获得 IgG 抗 A/-B 效价的精确值。 .

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the conventional tube test and column agglutination technology for ABO antibody titration in healthy individuals: a report from India.比较传统试管法与柱凝集技术在健康个体 ABO 抗体效价滴定中的应用:来自印度的报告。
Immunohematology. 2021 Mar;37(1):25-32. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2021-006.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Five Different Methods of Anti-ABO Antibody Titration: An Aid for ABO-Incompatible Organ Transplants.五种不同抗ABO抗体滴定方法的比较评估:对ABO血型不相容器官移植的辅助作用
Ther Apher Dial. 2019 Feb;23(1):86-91. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12745. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
Comparison of total and IgG ABO antibody titers in healthy individuals by using tube and column agglutination techniques.运用试管凝集技术和柱凝集技术比较健康个体中ABO抗体总滴度和IgG抗体滴度。
Ann Lab Med. 2014 May;34(3):223-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.223. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Streamlining ABO antibody titrations for monitoring ABO-incompatible kidney transplants.简化 ABO 抗体滴度监测用于 ABO 不相容肾移植。
Transfusion. 2010 Mar;50(3):631-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02478.x. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
5
Comparison of the tube test and column agglutination techniques for anti-A/-B antibody titration in healthy individuals.健康个体中抗A/抗B抗体滴定的试管试验与柱凝集技术比较
Vox Sang. 2018 Nov;113(8):787-794. doi: 10.1111/vox.12713. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
A prospective observational study to evaluate effect of heat inactivation on ABO titers performed by column agglutination technology and conventional tube technique.一项前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估热灭活对采用柱凝集技术和传统试管技术检测的ABO血型滴度的影响。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2023 Jan-Jun;17(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_175_20. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
7
Comparison of antibody titers using conventional tube technique versus column agglutination technique in ABO blood group incompatible renal transplant.在ABO血型不相容肾移植中使用传统试管技术与柱凝集技术比较抗体滴度
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2017 Jul-Dec;11(2):131-134. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.214343.
8
[Anti-A/B Antibody Titers in Group O Healthy Donors in Hainan Province Area].[海南省地区O型健康献血者抗A/B抗体效价]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;23(4):1138-43. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2015.04.044.
9
Comparative evaluation of DTT treated ABO isoagglutinin titres performed by two methods with solid phase red cell adhesion (SPRCA) titres.两种方法测定的经二硫苏糖醇(DTT)处理的ABO同种凝集素效价与固相红细胞黏附(SPRCA)效价的比较评估
Transfus Clin Biol. 2021 May;28(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
10
ABO antibody titres: a multisite comparative study of equivalency and reproducibility for automated solid-phase and haemagglutination titration, and manual dilution with gel column agglutination technology.ABO 抗体效价:自动化固相和血凝滴定与凝胶柱凝集技术的手动稀释比较的多中心研究,评估其等效性和可重复性。
Blood Transfus. 2022 Jul;20(4):329-337. doi: 10.2450/2022.0197-21. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of different methods for antibody titre determination in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.ABO血型不相容肾移植中抗体滴度测定不同方法的评估
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):540-552. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-617. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
ABO antibody titres: a multisite comparative study of equivalency and reproducibility for automated solid-phase and haemagglutination titration, and manual dilution with gel column agglutination technology.ABO 抗体效价:自动化固相和血凝滴定与凝胶柱凝集技术的手动稀释比较的多中心研究,评估其等效性和可重复性。
Blood Transfus. 2022 Jul;20(4):329-337. doi: 10.2450/2022.0197-21. Epub 2022 Jan 20.