• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种方法测定的经二硫苏糖醇(DTT)处理的ABO同种凝集素效价与固相红细胞黏附(SPRCA)效价的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of DTT treated ABO isoagglutinin titres performed by two methods with solid phase red cell adhesion (SPRCA) titres.

作者信息

Pandey P, Setya D, Ranjan S, Singh M K

机构信息

Department of transfusion medicine, histocompatibility and molecular biology, Jaypee hospital, Sector-128, 201304 Noida, India.

出版信息

Transfus Clin Biol. 2021 May;28(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.tracli.2021.01.002
PMID:33453374
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Measurement of actual concentration of IgG requires methods like treatment of serum with dithiothreitol (DTT). This study was aimed at comparing of DTT treated ABO titres performed by conventional test tube technique (CTT) and column agglutination technique (CAT) with HA/SPRCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study conducted from October 2019 to March 2020. All consecutive A, B and O group donors who gave consent for participation were included. All samples were tested by CTT and CAT before and after DTT treatment (pCTT, pCAT) and with HA/SPRCA.

RESULTS

A total of 300 donors were included; 100 each from A, B and O blood group donors. Group O titres were higher than group A/B titres. Group O titres were highest when performed by pCAT, followed by pCTT and lowest by HA/SPRCA. Group A/B titres were highest when performed by HA/SPRCA, followed by pCAT and pCTT for anti-A and highest when performed by pCAT, followed by HA/SPRCA and lowest by pCTT for anti-B.

CONCLUSION

Results obtained by pCAT were closer to results obtained by pCTT, whereas those obtained by HA/SPRCA were variable. SPRCA offers the advantage of automation, no inter-observer variation and less time consumption because IgM interference is not observed with SPRCA, thus providing an alternative to pCTT. However, these methods cannot be used interchangeably and to discern the most suitable method, a clinical impact of these results needs to be studied.

摘要

背景与目的

测量IgG的实际浓度需要采用如用二硫苏糖醇(DTT)处理血清等方法。本研究旨在比较经DTT处理的ABO血型滴度采用传统试管技术(CTT)和柱凝集技术(CAT)与血凝抑制试验/固相红细胞凝集试验(HA/SPRCA)的结果。

材料与方法

这是一项于2019年10月至2020年3月进行的前瞻性观察性研究。纳入了所有同意参与的连续A、B和O型血供者。所有样本在DTT处理前后分别采用CTT和CAT检测(pCTT、pCAT),并采用HA/SPRCA检测。

结果

共纳入300名供者;A、B和O型血供者各100名。O型血滴度高于A/B型血滴度。采用pCAT检测时O型血滴度最高,其次是pCTT,HA/SPRCA检测时最低。A/B型血抗A检测采用HA/SPRCA时滴度最高,其次是pCAT,pCTT最低;抗B检测采用pCAT时滴度最高,其次是HA/SPRCA,pCTT最低。

结论

pCAT获得的结果更接近pCTT获得的结果,而HA/SPRCA获得的结果则存在差异。SPRCA具有自动化、无观察者间差异和耗时少的优点,因为未观察到SPRCA存在IgM干扰,从而为pCTT提供了一种替代方法。然而,这些方法不能互换使用,为了辨别最合适的方法,需要研究这些结果的临床影响。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of DTT treated ABO isoagglutinin titres performed by two methods with solid phase red cell adhesion (SPRCA) titres.两种方法测定的经二硫苏糖醇(DTT)处理的ABO同种凝集素效价与固相红细胞黏附(SPRCA)效价的比较评估
Transfus Clin Biol. 2021 May;28(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
2
Comparative evaluation of the conventional tube test and column agglutination technology for ABO antibody titration in healthy individuals: a report from India.比较传统试管法与柱凝集技术在健康个体 ABO 抗体效价滴定中的应用:来自印度的报告。
Immunohematology. 2021 Mar;37(1):25-32. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2021-006.
3
A prospective observational study to evaluate effect of heat inactivation on ABO titers performed by column agglutination technology and conventional tube technique.一项前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估热灭活对采用柱凝集技术和传统试管技术检测的ABO血型滴度的影响。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2023 Jan-Jun;17(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_175_20. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
ABO antibody titres: a multisite comparative study of equivalency and reproducibility for automated solid-phase and haemagglutination titration, and manual dilution with gel column agglutination technology.ABO 抗体效价:自动化固相和血凝滴定与凝胶柱凝集技术的手动稀释比较的多中心研究,评估其等效性和可重复性。
Blood Transfus. 2022 Jul;20(4):329-337. doi: 10.2450/2022.0197-21. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
5
Comparison of ABO antibody titration, IgG subclasses and qualitative haemolysin test to reduce the risk of passive haemolysis associated with platelet transfusion.比较 ABO 抗体效价、IgG 亚类和定性溶血试验,以降低血小板输注相关被动溶血的风险。
Transfus Med. 2020 Aug;30(4):317-323. doi: 10.1111/tme.12687. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
Comparison of ABO isoagglutinin titres by three different methods: tube haemagglutination, micro-column agglutination and automated immunohematology analyzer based on erythrocyte-magnetized technology.三种不同方法检测 ABO 同种异型抗体效价的比较:试管凝集法、微柱凝集法和基于红细胞磁化技术的自动化免疫血液学分析仪。
Vox Sang. 2020 Apr;115(3):233-240. doi: 10.1111/vox.12878. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Comparison of total and IgG ABO antibody titers in healthy individuals by using tube and column agglutination techniques.运用试管凝集技术和柱凝集技术比较健康个体中ABO抗体总滴度和IgG抗体滴度。
Ann Lab Med. 2014 May;34(3):223-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.223. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Five Different Methods of Anti-ABO Antibody Titration: An Aid for ABO-Incompatible Organ Transplants.五种不同抗ABO抗体滴定方法的比较评估:对ABO血型不相容器官移植的辅助作用
Ther Apher Dial. 2019 Feb;23(1):86-91. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12745. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Comparison between tube test and automated column agglutination technology on VISION Max for anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres: A multidimensional analysis.VISION Max上试管法与自动柱凝集技术检测抗A/B同种凝集素效价的比较:多维分析
Vox Sang. 2022 Mar;117(3):399-407. doi: 10.1111/vox.13184. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Comparison of the tube test and column agglutination techniques for anti-A/-B antibody titration in healthy individuals.健康个体中抗A/抗B抗体滴定的试管试验与柱凝集技术比较
Vox Sang. 2018 Nov;113(8):787-794. doi: 10.1111/vox.12713. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between ABO non-identical platelet transfusions and patient outcomes-A multicenter retrospective analysis.ABO 非同型血小板输注与患者结局的关联:一项多中心回顾性分析。
Transfusion. 2023 May;63(5):960-972. doi: 10.1111/trf.17319. Epub 2023 Mar 30.