• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与初次 Latarjet 相比,关节镜下 Bankart 修复失败后行 Latarjet 术的复发性不稳定发生率增加一倍。

Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet.

机构信息

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2021 Nov;37(11):3248-3252. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059. Epub 2021 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059
PMID:33964387
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess recurrent instability of the shoulder following open Latarjet performed as the primary stabilization procedure or as a salvage procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent open Latarjet from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. All patients were diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and had a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized as either having a primary Latarjet (PL; no prior shoulder stabilization procedure) or salvage Latarjet (SL; ≥1 previous arthroscopic surgical stabilization procedures).

RESULTS

A total of 234 Latarjet procedures were performed in 234 patients. The overall recurrent instability rate was 15.8% (37/234), the overall reoperation rate was 16.7% (36/234), and the overall complication rate was 14.2% (33/234) over a mean 5.0 years of follow-up. There were 99 PL procedures and 135 SL procedures. The SL group had significantly more recurrent instability than the PL group (SL 28/135, 20.7%; PL 9/99, 9.1%; P = .0158). There was no difference in overall reoperation rates (SL 26/135, 19.3%; PL 13/99, 13.1%; P = .2140) or complication rates (SL 20/135, 14.8%; PL 13/99, 13.3%; P = .9101).

CONCLUSION

The rate of recurrent instability following the Latarjet procedure in an active, high-risk population is 15.8%. Primary Latarjet was found to have lower rates of recurrence compared with salvage Latarjet procedures (9.1% versus 20.7%).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

评估开放式 Latarjet 手术作为初次稳定术或挽救性手术治疗后肩部的复发性不稳定。

方法

对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间,在军事医疗系统中连续系列接受开放式 Latarjet 手术的患者进行回顾性、比较队列研究。所有患者均被诊断为复发性前肩不稳定,并至少有 2 年的术后随访。患者分为原发性 Latarjet(PL;无先前肩稳定手术)或挽救性 Latarjet(SL;≥1 次关节镜下手术稳定术)。

结果

234 名患者共行 234 次 Latarjet 手术。总的复发性不稳定率为 15.8%(37/234),总的再手术率为 16.7%(36/234),平均随访 5.0 年后总体并发症发生率为 14.2%(33/234)。PL 组 99 例,SL 组 135 例。SL 组的复发性不稳定发生率明显高于 PL 组(SL 28/135,20.7%;PL 9/99,9.1%;P=0.0158)。两组总体再手术率(SL 26/135,19.3%;PL 13/99,13.1%;P=0.2140)或并发症发生率(SL 20/135,14.8%;PL 13/99,13.3%;P=0.9101)无差异。

结论

在活跃的高风险人群中,Latarjet 手术后复发性不稳定的发生率为 15.8%。原发性 Latarjet 与挽救性 Latarjet 手术相比,复发率较低(9.1%比 20.7%)。

证据等级

III 级。

相似文献

1
Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet.与初次 Latarjet 相比,关节镜下 Bankart 修复失败后行 Latarjet 术的复发性不稳定发生率增加一倍。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Nov;37(11):3248-3252. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
Long-Term Restoration of Anterior Shoulder Stability: A Retrospective Analysis of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet Procedure.长期恢复肩关节前向稳定性:关节镜下 Bankart 修复与开放式 Latarjet 手术的回顾性分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Dec 7;98(23):1954-1961. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01398.
3
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.关节镜下Bankart修复术与开放Bristow-Latarjet手术治疗肩关节不稳的比较:一项聚焦于恢复运动的配对多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
The open latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic bankart repair.就肩部稳定性而言,开放Latarjet手术比关节镜下Bankart修复术更可靠。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2345-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3550-9.
5
Long-term Results of the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Older Than 40 Years: A Comparison With the Open Latarjet Procedure.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术治疗 40 岁以上复发性肩关节前向不稳定患者的长期疗效:与开放 Latarjet 手术的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2090-2096. doi: 10.1177/0363546520931090. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Previous arthroscopic Bankart repair is an independent risk factor for an inferior outcome after Latarjet procedure.先前的关节镜下 Bankart 修复术是 Latarjet 手术后预后不良的独立危险因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8):1481-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet as a Revision Surgery After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.关节镜下 Latarjet 术作为初次关节镜 Bankart 修复失败后的翻修手术的疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jan;52(1):190-200. doi: 10.1177/03635465231209986.
8
Does previous arthroscopic Bankart repair influence coracoid graft osteolysis in Latarjet procedure? A case-control study with computed tomography scan data.既往关节镜下Bankart修复术是否会影响Latarjet手术中喙突移植骨的骨溶解?一项基于计算机断层扫描数据的病例对照研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Apr;33(4):e223-e230. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
9
Chronic anterior shoulder instability with significant Hill-Sachs lesion: Arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage versus open Latarjet procedure.伴有明显Hill-Sachs损伤的慢性肩关节前向不稳:关节镜下Bankart修复术联合充填术与开放性Latarjet手术的比较
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Feb;104(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Patients With Prior Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Primary Cases.Latarjet 手术治疗慢性肩关节前向不稳定的疗效:关节镜下 Bankart 修复术与初次病例比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;48(1):27-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546519888909.

引用本文的文献

1
Salvage Latarjet may provide worse outcomes in terms of recurrent instability and returning to sports compared to primary Latarjet: a systematic review of comparative studies.与初次 Latarjet 相比,挽救性 Latarjet 可能在复发性不稳定和重返运动方面提供更差的结果:一项比较研究的系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jun 27;25(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07593-w.
2
Clinical outcomes of open Latarjet-Patte procedures performed for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with primary bone loss versus failed arthroscopic Bankart repair.对伴有原发性骨质丢失的复发性前肩不稳与关节镜下Bankart修复失败患者实施开放式Latarjet-Patte手术的临床结果
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024 Jun;27(2):176-182. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00619. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Outcomes of the Latarjet procedure in female patients: A case series and matched-pair analysis.女性患者Latarjet手术的结果:病例系列及配对分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Feb;16(1):76-84. doi: 10.1177/17585732231217170. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: current concepts and surgical techniques.关节镜下Latarjet手术:当前概念与手术技术
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Dec;26(4):445-454. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01396. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
The Glenoid Track Paradigm Does Not Reliably Affect Military Surgeons' Approach to Managing Shoulder Instability.肩胛盂轨迹范式并不能可靠地影响军事外科医生处理肩关节不稳定的方法。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 18;5(2):e403-e409. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.007. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Latarjet procedure for failed Bankart repair provides better stability and return to sports, but worse postoperative pain and external rotation limitations with more complications, compared to revision Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.相比于翻修 Bankart 修复术,Latarjet 术治疗失败的 Bankart 修复术可提供更好的稳定性和运动功能恢复,但术后疼痛和外旋受限更严重,且并发症更多:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3541-3558. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07410-2. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
7
No Differences in 90-Day Complications and Admissions After Latarjet Procedure for Primary Bone Loss Versus Latarjet Procedure for Failed Arthroscopic Instability Repair.针对原发性骨质流失的Latarjet手术与关节镜下不稳定修复失败后的Latarjet手术,90天并发症及住院情况无差异。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 25;4(5):e1647-e1651. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.06.010. eCollection 2022 Oct.