Suppr超能文献

价值观影响公众对洪水管理方案的看法。

Values influence public perceptions of flood management schemes.

机构信息

School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom; Devon County Council, UK.

School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 1;291:112636. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112636. Epub 2021 May 6.

Abstract

Natural Flood Management (NFM) is now well established as a paradigm for reducing flood risk. It is characterised by adopting a catchment-wide hydrological perspective and implementing solutions that work with natural processes such as wetlands, riparian vegetation and river channel rehabilitation. However, despite substantial attention in the river science literature and growing appreciation for NFM among environmental managers, little research has been conducted on how the public perceives NFM. This study explored preferences for a variety of flood risk management schemes through an online survey of the UK public, and assessed how different characteristics of these schemes contribute to preferences via Q-method utilising an array of photographs. Relationships between survey respondents' underlying transcendental values and their preferences for NFM schemes were also studied. Results revealed that while NFM approaches were appreciated for their appearance and wildlife benefits, traditional grey engineering - particularly dams - was seen as more effective in ameliorating flood risk. Q-sorts of photographs revealed three factors that characterised participants' preferences: (i) "Engineered - Natural", (ii) "Messy - Neat" and (iii) "Grey - Green". Finally, transcendental values were significantly related to flood scheme preferences, with 'Self-Transcendence' values positively correlated with preferences for tree planting and wetlands and negatively with dams and weirs. 'Conservative' values were positively correlated with preferences for dredging and weirs and negatively with wetlands. These findings emphasise the plurality of public perceptions related to NFM and the diverse value orientations within which they are grounded. River and catchment managers seeking to promote NFM solutions should focus on addressing public concerns about the efficacy of NFM for mitigating flood risk, and consider how to communicate solutions in ways that resonate with a diverse set of public values.

摘要

自然洪水管理(NFM)现已成为降低洪水风险的典范。它的特点是采用集水区水文观点,并实施与湿地、河岸植被和河道恢复等自然过程协同工作的解决方案。然而,尽管在河流科学文献中受到了大量关注,并且环境管理者对 NFM 的认识也在不断提高,但对公众如何看待 NFM 的研究却很少。本研究通过对英国公众的在线调查,探讨了对各种洪水风险管理方案的偏好,并通过利用一系列照片的 Q 方法评估了这些方案的不同特征如何促成偏好。还研究了调查受访者的潜在先验价值观与他们对 NFM 方案偏好之间的关系。结果表明,尽管 NFM 方法因其外观和野生动物效益而受到赞赏,但传统的灰色工程——特别是水坝——被认为在减轻洪水风险方面更有效。照片的 Q 排序揭示了参与者偏好的三个特征:(i)“工程化-自然化”,(ii)“杂乱-整洁”和(iii)“灰色-绿色”。最后,先验价值观与洪水方案偏好显著相关,“自我超越”价值观与植树和湿地的偏好呈正相关,与水坝和堰的偏好呈负相关。“保守”价值观与疏浚和堰的偏好呈正相关,与湿地的偏好呈负相关。这些发现强调了与 NFM 相关的公众认知的多样性,以及它们所基于的多样化价值观取向。寻求推广 NFM 解决方案的河流和集水区管理者应关注解决公众对 NFM 缓解洪水风险的功效的担忧,并考虑如何以与一系列不同公众价值观产生共鸣的方式传达解决方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验