Divisions of Cardiology and Liver Transplant, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Divisions of Cardiology and Liver Transplant, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Transplant Proc. 2021 Jun;53(5):1616-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.02.026. Epub 2021 May 5.
Cardiac testing of candidates for liver transplant (LT) requires balancing risks and benefits of cardiac procedures. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of the Framingham score (FS) for optimizing preoperative risk stratification for coronary artery disease (CAD).
In this single-center retrospective study of 615 adults undergoing LT evaluation from 2016 to 2019, data of preoperative evaluation, post-LT 1-year mortality, and post-LT cardiac events were reviewed. Patients >30 years of age with normal echocardiogram underwent FS calculation. Elevated FS (≥35%) patients were triaged to undergo angiogram for CAD evaluation; FS <35% patients underwent stress testing as initial CAD evaluation.
Of 615 patients referred for LT, 481 underwent cardiac testing. Ninety-five were excluded from the FS pathway because of age, abnormal baseline echocardiogram, or known CAD. Of the remaining 386 patients in the FS pathway, 342 had a low FS and 44 had a high FS. In patients with low FS, 90% underwent stress testing as initial test; 16% underwent invasive testing at some time. In those with elevated FS, 59% underwent invasive testing as initial test. Listing rate and posttransplant outcomes were similar between patients with low and high FS.
We demonstrated the feasibility of a simple algorithmic evaluation process using FS for optimizing pre-LT risk stratification for CAD. Although exceptions to the protocol occur, the proposed protocol allows for a streamlined approach by prioritizing testing based on cardiac risk. This approach may maximize diagnostic yield while limiting invasive procedures.
对肝移植(LT)候选者进行心脏检查需要权衡心脏检查程序的风险和获益。本研究的目的是评估 Framingham 评分(FS)在优化冠状动脉疾病(CAD)术前风险分层中的作用。
在这项对 2016 年至 2019 年期间进行 LT 评估的 615 名成年人的单中心回顾性研究中,回顾了术前评估、LT 术后 1 年死亡率和 LT 后心脏事件的数据。年龄>30 岁且超声心动图正常的患者进行 FS 计算。FS 升高(≥35%)的患者接受冠状动脉造影检查以评估 CAD;FS<35%的患者接受压力测试作为初始 CAD 评估。
在 615 名接受 LT 转诊的患者中,有 481 名患者进行了心脏检查。95 名患者因年龄、基线超声心动图异常或已知 CAD 而被排除在 FS 途径之外。在 FS 途径的剩余 386 名患者中,342 名患者 FS 较低,44 名患者 FS 较高。在 FS 较低的患者中,90%的患者最初接受了压力测试;16%的患者在某个时间点进行了有创性检查。在 FS 升高的患者中,59%的患者最初接受了有创性检查。低 FS 和高 FS 患者的列表率和移植后结局相似。
我们证明了使用 FS 对 CAD 进行简单的算法性术前风险分层评估的可行性。尽管该方案存在例外情况,但该方案通过基于心脏风险优先安排测试,允许采用简化的方法。这种方法可以最大限度地提高诊断效果,同时限制有创性操作。