Real world outcomes of lateral internal sphincterotomy vs botulinum toxin for the management of chronic anal fissures.

BACKGROUND

Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) remains the gold standard surgical approach for the management of chronic anal fissures (CAF). The procedure however, is complicated by the risk of postoperative incontinence. Intrasphincteric Botulinum Toxin (BT) has gained popularity as an alternative approach, despite being inferior to LIS with regards to cure rates. In the real world, patients at high risk for postoperative incontinence are likely to be offered BT as a preliminary procedure. The aim of this study was to explore the real-world outcomes of LIS and BT for a cohort of CAF patients.

METHODS

251 consecutive patients treated with either BT or LS for CAF by a single surgeon were reviewed. Patients were offered BT as a preliminary procedure if they had risk factors for faecal incontinence, whereas all other patients underwent LIS. Primary outcomes included rates of recurrence and faecal incontinence.

RESULTS

LIS was superior to BT with regards to recurrence rates throughout the mean follow up period of five years (5% vs 15%, p = 0.012). A total of 17 patients experienced a minor degree of flatal incontinence at the 6-week follow up, although there was no difference between LIS and BT (7% vs 6%, p = 1.000). Four LIS patients (2%) continued to experience some minor incontinence to flatus at the 12-month follow up and were managed with biofeedback.

CONCLUSION

For patients with CAF, individualizing the treatment approach according to risk factors for incontinence could mitigate this risk in LIS. High risk patients should be offered BT as a preliminary procedure.