The University of Kansas, Philosophy Department, 1445 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS, Wescoe Hall, Room, 3090, United States.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2021 Apr;86:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
There is no denying the Central Dogma's impact on the biological sciences. Since the Dogma's formulation by Francis Crick in 1958, however, many have debated the Dogma's empirical adequacy. My aim is to move beyond these discussions, and instead consider the Central Dogma's significance to contemporary biological practice. To do this, I consider four distinct approaches for determining the non-descriptive methodological significance of a scientific principle. I argue that these approaches fail to vindicate the Central Dogma, and that, under many of these approaches, the Dogma amounts to a triviality.
不可否认,中心法则对生物科学产生了深远的影响。然而,自弗朗西斯·克里克(Francis Crick)于 1958 年提出该法则以来,许多人对其经验有效性展开了激烈的争论。我的目标是超越这些讨论,转而思考中心法则对当代生物实践的重要意义。为此,我考虑了四种不同的方法来确定科学原理的非描述性方法论意义。我认为这些方法都无法证明中心法则的合理性,而且在许多情况下,该法则只不过是一个无足轻重的事实。