Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021 Apr;39(2):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
The methods used for the processing of periprosthetic tissues and explanted implants to improve culture outcome especially in biofilm mediated prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are still debated upon. Studies have reported that Dithiothreitol (DTT) pretreatment of infected devices gives similar results as sonication. However, none of them evaluated the DTT treatment of periprosthetic tissues and explanted implants in the same cohort. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of DTT treatment of periprosthetic tissue and explanted implants, as compared to the normal saline treatment of periprosthetic tissues and sonication of explanted implants for the diagnosis of PJI.
Seventy-three revision arthroplasty cases were prospectively included in this study. Three to five tissue specimens and the explanted implants were collected from each patient. Periprosthetic tissue samples were processed by both normal saline and DTT treatments. Explanted implants were subjected to both DTT treatment and sonication. Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) PJI criteria was used as the reference standard for the diagnosis of PJI.
Of the 73 cases enrolled, 34 had PJI and 39 were aseptic failures. The sensitivity of DTT treated periprosthetic tissue culture (PTC) and saline treated PTC was similar (66.6% vs 58.8%, P = 0.25). The specificity of both was 100%. Sonication and DTT treatment of explanted implants showed comparable sensitivity (85.3% vs 82.4%) and specificity (100% vs 97.4%), P > 0.99. Compared to DTT treated PTC, culture of DTT treated explanted implants significantly improved the diagnosis of PJI (P = 0.03).
We could verify that DTT can be used to improve culture outcome in laboratories where biofilm detaching sonication techniques are not available for infected implants. In addition, we showed that it is possible to use DTT for treating tissue biopsies, but larger studies are required to confirm our findings.
为了提高培养物的结果,尤其是在生物膜介导的人工关节感染(PJI)中,目前对于处理假体周围组织和取出的植入物的方法仍存在争议。有研究报道称,使用二硫苏糖醇(DTT)预处理感染的器械与超声处理具有相似的效果。然而,目前还没有研究评估 DTT 处理假体周围组织和取出的植入物的效果。我们评估了 DTT 处理假体周围组织和取出的植入物与生理盐水处理假体周围组织和超声处理取出的植入物在诊断 PJI 方面的诊断价值。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 73 例翻修关节成形术病例。每位患者采集 3-5 份组织标本和取出的植入物。假体周围组织标本分别用生理盐水和 DTT 处理,取出的植入物分别用 DTT 处理和超声处理。以肌骨骼感染学会(MSIS)的 PJI 标准作为 PJI 诊断的参考标准。
73 例患者中,34 例为 PJI,39 例为无菌性失败。DTT 处理的假体周围组织培养(PTC)和生理盐水处理的 PTC 的敏感性相似(66.6% vs 58.8%,P=0.25),特异性均为 100%。超声处理和 DTT 处理取出的植入物的敏感性相当(85.3% vs 82.4%),特异性均为 100%(P>0.99)。与 DTT 处理的 PTC 相比,DTT 处理的取出的植入物的培养显著提高了 PJI 的诊断(P=0.03)。
我们可以验证 DTT 可用于改善无法使用生物膜分离超声技术的实验室中感染植入物的培养物结果。此外,我们发现可以使用 DTT 处理组织活检,但需要更大规模的研究来证实我们的发现。