Baldassini Welder Angelo, Machado Neto Otávio Rodrigues, Fernandes Talita Tanaka, de Paula Ament Hyezza, Luz Matheus Geraldine, Santiago Bismarck Moreira, Curi Rogério Abdallah, Chardulo Luis Artur Loyola
UNESP/FMVZ - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Melhoramento e Nutrição Animal/ School of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Walter Maurício Correa, s/nº, Botucatu, São Paulo 18.618-681 Brazil.
J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Jun;58(6):2441-2446. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04941-1. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
Meat tenderness is one of the principal attribute associated with consumer preferences. This study describes tenderness measurements at three final endpoint cooking temperatures (51, 61 and 71 °C) using a mechanical Warner-Bratzler (WBSF) as the standard instrument versus digital texturometer (CT3) and penetrometer (FHT) devices. Thirty-six cross-breed heifers () with initial body weight 330 ± 40 kg, 20-24 months of age, were slaughtered after 100 days on feed. Subsequently, 48 h post-slaughter, (LT) samples were collected between the 10th and 13th ribs. Six LT samples from each animal were used to evaluate tenderness and cooking losses through analysis of variance and regression analyses. No interaction between device × temperature was observed ( = 0.57). Shear force values were greater ( < 0.05) as endpoint cooking increased and the results from CT3 were close to the ones using the WBSF (R = 0.76; < 0.0001). In conclusion, the digital CT3 can replace the mechanical WBSF because these devices were strongly correlated (r = 0.85; < 0.00). However, the results from FHT were underestimated (R = 0.19; < 0.006), indicating that FHT device should not be used for the evaluation of meat tenderness.
肉的嫩度是与消费者偏好相关的主要属性之一。本研究描述了在三个最终终点烹饪温度(51、61和71°C)下使用机械沃纳 - 布拉茨勒剪切力(WBSF)作为标准仪器与数字质构仪(CT3)和 penetrometer(FHT)设备进行嫩度测量的情况。三十六头初始体重为330±40千克、年龄在20 - 24个月的杂交小母牛,在饲养100天后进行屠宰。随后,在屠宰后48小时,从第10和第13肋骨之间采集腰大肌(LT)样本。对每头动物的六个LT样本进行方差分析和回归分析,以评估嫩度和烹饪损失。未观察到设备×温度之间的相互作用(P = 0.57)。随着终点烹饪温度升高,剪切力值更大(P < 0.05),并且CT3的结果与使用WBSF的结果接近(R = 0.76;P < 0.0001)。总之,数字CT3可以替代机械WBSF,因为这些设备具有很强的相关性(r = 0.85;P < 0.00)。然而,FHT的结果被低估了(R = 0.19;P < 0.006),这表明FHT设备不应被用于评估肉的嫩度。