Wang Cong, Ning Xiaofei, Duan Yangcan, Zhang Zhonglu, Wang Shaochun
Department of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272000, P.R. China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272000, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jun;21(6):643. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10075. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
Ultrasound is recommended as a first-line requirement prior to MRI or amniotic fluid analysis, which have high diagnostic accuracy for esophageal atresia (EA). Therefore, the aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of high-performance ultrasound for the prenatal examination of EA/tracheoesophageal fistula (TOF). In total, 64 pregnant women with fetuses suspected of having EA/TOF participated in the study. The gestational age of the fetuses ranged between 16 and 40 weeks, with a mean of 26.33±3.57 weeks. Ultrasound images of the esophagus and trachea on parasternal and para-aortic axis longitudinal and transverse sections were compared with the results of standard postnatal diagnostic tests. Sensitivity and specificity values were determined and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated. Among all the fetuses screened, 16 were suspected of having EA/TOF during the prenatal ultrasonography. In postnatal examinations, 34 cases of EA/TOF were confirmed, corresponding to an EA/TOF incidence of 53.2% (95% CI, 40.2-65.7%). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was lower for prenatal ultrasonography compared with postnatal diagnostic tests (AUC=0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65). Considering postnatal examination as the gold standard, prenatal ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 29.4% (95% CI, 15.1-47.5%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 61.4-92.3%) for the diagnosis of EA/TOF. In addition, the positive predictive value was 62.5% (95% CI, 35.4-82.8%), the negative predictive value was 50% (95% CI, 35.2-64.8%), the positive likelihood ratio was 1.47 (95% CI, 0.61-3.56) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.67-1.17). The results of the present study indicate that preoperative ultrasound has poor sensitivity but very good specificity for the diagnosis of EA/TOF. The use of ultrasound alone would result in a high rate of a false-positive diagnoses. However, prenatal ultrasonography may be useful as a preliminary screening tool to exclude patients for suspected EA/TOF.
在进行MRI或羊水分析之前,建议先进行超声检查,这两种检查对食管闭锁(EA)具有较高的诊断准确性。因此,本前瞻性研究的目的是评估高性能超声对EA/气管食管瘘(TOF)产前检查的准确性。共有64名怀疑胎儿患有EA/TOF的孕妇参与了该研究。胎儿的孕周在16至40周之间,平均为26.33±3.57周。将胸骨旁和主动脉旁轴纵向及横向切面的食管和气管超声图像与标准产后诊断测试结果进行比较。确定敏感性和特异性值,并生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。在所有筛查的胎儿中,16例在产前超声检查中被怀疑患有EA/TOF。产后检查确诊34例EA/TOF,对应EA/TOF发病率为53.2%(95%CI,40.2 - 65.7%)。与产后诊断测试相比,产前超声检查的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)较低(AUC = 0.55;95%CI,0.44 - 0.65)。以产后检查为金标准,产前超声检查对EA/TOF诊断的敏感性为29.4%(95%CI,15.1 - 47.5%),特异性为80%(95%CI,61.