• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后采用加速康复方案体内完成改良回肠代膀胱术:48例经验

Modified ileal conduit intracorporeally accomplished following laparoscopic radical cystectomy with enhanced recovery protocols: experience with 48 cases.

作者信息

Wei Houyi, Wang Mingshuai, Wasilijiang Wahafu, Wang Wei, Guan Xing, Zhou Xiaoguang, Song Liming, Xing Nianzeng, Niu Yinong

机构信息

Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1596-1606. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1515.

DOI:10.21037/tau-20-1515
PMID:33968648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8100832/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study introduces the results of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with modified intracorporeal ileal conduit (mICIC), which was accompanied by enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.

METHODS

From March 2014 to June 2020, 48 patients underwent mICIC. Patients were divided into ERAS (n=17) and non-ERAS groups (n=31). Baseline and perioperative variables were analyzed. The primary outcome was 90-day complications. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of stay, two-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients underwent intracorporeal ileal conduit with no transition to open surgery. Twenty-five patients (52.1%) experienced at least one complication, including 22 minor cases (45.8%) and three major cases (6.2%). The median operative time, urinary diversion time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were 320 min, 135 min, 200 mL, and 10.5 days, respectively. The median time to flatus and normal diet were two days and three days, respectively. A comparison between ERAS and non-ERAS groups indicated that ERAS implementation was associated with less complications (29.4% 64.5%, P=0.018), faster time to flatus (2 3 days, P=0.016) and liquid diet (2 4 days, P<0.001). The results of hydronephrosis and compromised renal function showed no difference between the preoperative period and six months after surgery. The mean follow-up time was 25.4 months, and the two-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival rates were 61.3%, 73.2%, and 58.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The complication rate and operative time of the mICIC were acceptable. Clinical outcomes can be optimized with ERAS pathway.

摘要

背景

本研究介绍了采用改良体内回肠代膀胱术(mICIC)的腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的结果,该手术采用了加速康复外科(ERAS)方案。

方法

2014年3月至2020年6月,48例患者接受了mICIC手术。患者分为ERAS组(n = 17)和非ERAS组(n = 31)。分析了基线和围手术期变量。主要结局为90天并发症。次要结局为手术时间、住院时间、两年总生存率、癌症特异性生存率和无病生存率。

结果

48例患者接受了体内回肠代膀胱术,无一例转为开放手术。25例患者(52.1%)至少发生一种并发症,包括22例轻微并发症(45.8%)和3例严重并发症(6.2%)。中位手术时间、尿流改道时间、估计失血量和住院时间分别为320分钟、135分钟、200毫升和10.5天。排气和正常饮食的中位时间分别为两天和三天。ERAS组与非ERAS组的比较表明,实施ERAS与较少的并发症(29.4%对64.5%,P = 0.018)、更快的排气时间(2天对3天,P = 0.016)和流食时间(2天对4天,P < 0.001)相关。肾盂积水和肾功能受损的结果在术前和术后六个月之间无差异。平均随访时间为25.4个月,两年总生存率、癌症特异性生存率和无病生存率分别为61.3%、73.2%和58.4%。

结论

mICIC的并发症发生率和手术时间是可以接受的。采用ERAS路径可优化临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/ee25b9bcf6aa/tau-10-04-1596-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/83ba12211ade/tau-10-04-1596-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4c33c9b5fdf4/tau-10-04-1596-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/6aa205e182c8/tau-10-04-1596-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4827f1dfe414/tau-10-04-1596-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/f7c401a6438d/tau-10-04-1596-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4c1a892555da/tau-10-04-1596-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4d1c0e226cf5/tau-10-04-1596-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/73185d3bf8a3/tau-10-04-1596-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/50db4f9e2d94/tau-10-04-1596-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/ee25b9bcf6aa/tau-10-04-1596-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/83ba12211ade/tau-10-04-1596-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4c33c9b5fdf4/tau-10-04-1596-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/6aa205e182c8/tau-10-04-1596-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4827f1dfe414/tau-10-04-1596-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/f7c401a6438d/tau-10-04-1596-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4c1a892555da/tau-10-04-1596-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/4d1c0e226cf5/tau-10-04-1596-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/73185d3bf8a3/tau-10-04-1596-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/50db4f9e2d94/tau-10-04-1596-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c13/8100832/ee25b9bcf6aa/tau-10-04-1596-f10.jpg

相似文献

1
Modified ileal conduit intracorporeally accomplished following laparoscopic radical cystectomy with enhanced recovery protocols: experience with 48 cases.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后采用加速康复方案体内完成改良回肠代膀胱术:48例经验
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1596-1606. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1515.
2
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileal conduit: A matched-pair comparison in a multicenter cohort in Japan.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术行体腔内置入与外置回肠导管术的围手术期和肿瘤学结局:日本多中心队列中的配对比较。
Int J Urol. 2020 Jun;27(6):559-565. doi: 10.1111/iju.14245. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
3
A Retrospective Study Comparing Surgical and Early Oncological Outcomes between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit after Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy from a Single Center.单中心腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后回肠内外通道的回顾性比较手术和早期肿瘤学结果的研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Apr 5;131(7):784-789. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.228236.
4
Progressive perioperative benefits of laparoscopy in combination with an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol in radical cystectomy with ileal conduit.腹腔镜联合 ERAS(术后加速康复)方案在根治性膀胱切除加回肠导管术的围手术期的进展获益。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 May;45(4):289-299. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.10.008. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
[Clinical experiences of laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the elderly patients with bladder cancer].老年膀胱癌患者腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术及尿流改道的临床经验
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 9;99(14):1101-1105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.14.013.
6
Propensity score-matched analysis for ileal conduit and orthotopic neobladder intracorporeally accomplished following laparoscopic radical cystectomy.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后行腔内回肠导管和原位新膀胱的倾向评分匹配分析。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Apr;45(4):987-992. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
7
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal urinary diversions: A randomized controlled trial.接受根治性膀胱切除术并行回肠代膀胱术患者的术后加速康复(ERAS)方案:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20902. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020902.
8
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit diversion: five cases with a 2-year follow-up.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合体内回肠膀胱术:5例患者的2年随访
BJU Int. 2002 Sep;90(4):391-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02954.x.
9
Surgical outcomes and learning curve of totally intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion following laparoscopic radical cystectomy at a single institution.单中心腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后全内脏层回肠导管尿流改道术的手术结果和学习曲线。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Oct;13(4):532-538. doi: 10.1111/ases.12793. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
10
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit: one center experience and clinical outcomes.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合腔内回肠导管:单中心经验和临床结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 May-Jun;45(3):560-571. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0262.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological and functional outcomes and complications of robotic intracorporeal Studer orthotopic neobladder: A single-center retrospective study.机器人体内Studer原位新膀胱的肿瘤学和功能结局及并发症:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Bladder (San Franc). 2025 Jan 9;12(1):e21200029. doi: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0025. eCollection 2025.
2
Feasibility analysis of arterial CT radiomics model to predict the risk of local and metastatic recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.动脉CT影像组学模型预测膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后局部和远处复发风险的可行性分析
Discov Oncol. 2024 Feb 19;15(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-00880-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileal conduit: A matched-pair comparison in a multicenter cohort in Japan.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术行体腔内置入与外置回肠导管术的围手术期和肿瘤学结局:日本多中心队列中的配对比较。
Int J Urol. 2020 Jun;27(6):559-565. doi: 10.1111/iju.14245. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
2
Do patients benefit from total intracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy?: A comparative analysis with extracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy from a Korean multicenter study.全腹腔镜下机器人根治性膀胱切除术是否使患者受益?:来自韩国多中心研究的与体外机器人根治性膀胱切除术的对比分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Jan;61(1):11-18. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.11. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
3
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus standard recovery for elective gastric cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.手术快速康复(ERAS)与择期胃癌手术标准康复的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;32:75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Long-term Oncological Outcomes from an Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL).开放、机器人辅助和腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(CORAL)的早期随机对照三臂试验的长期肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.027. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
Is the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Effective and Safe in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.加速康复外科(ERAS)方案在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中是否有效且安全?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1502-1512. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04170-8. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
6
A Retrospective Study Comparing Surgical and Early Oncological Outcomes between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit after Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy from a Single Center.单中心腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后回肠内外通道的回顾性比较手术和早期肿瘤学结果的研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Apr 5;131(7):784-789. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.228236.
7
Outcomes of Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内尿流改道术结果:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的研究结果。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1302-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.045. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy with ileal urinary diversion: a multi-institutional, randomized, controlled trial from the Chinese bladder cancer consortium.根治性膀胱切除术加回肠代膀胱术后的加速康复:来自中国膀胱癌联盟的多中心、随机、对照临床试验。
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2108-3. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
9
Prospective Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols to Radical Cystectomy.手术增强康复方案在根治性膀胱切除术中的前瞻性实施。
Eur Urol. 2018 Mar;73(3):363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
10
Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的加速康复:EAU 机器人泌尿外科分会共识意见。
Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 May 24.