Suppr超能文献

2019冠状病毒病对住院临床急症的影响:单中心经验

Impact of COVID-19 on inpatient clinical emergencies: A single-center experience.

作者信息

Mitchell Oscar J L, Neefe Stacie, Ginestra Jennifer C, Baston Cameron M, Frazer Michael J, Gudowski Steven, Min Jeff, Ahmed Nahreen H, Pascual Jose L, Schweickert William D, Anderson Brian J, Anesi George L, Falk Scott A, Shashaty Michael G S

机构信息

Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States.

Critical Care Nursing, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, United States.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2021 Jun;6:100135. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100135. Epub 2021 May 4.

Abstract

AIM

Determine changes in rapid response team (RRT) activations and describe institutional adaptations made during a surge in hospitalizations for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

Using prospectively collected data, we compared characteristics of RRT calls at our academic hospital from March 7 through May 31, 2020 (COVID-19 era) versus those from January 1 through March 6, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 era). We used negative binomial regression to test differences in RRT activation rates normalized to floor (non-ICU) inpatient census between pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras, including the sub-era of rapid COVID-19 census surge and plateau (March 28 through May 2, 2020).

RESULTS

RRT activations for respiratory distress rose substantially during the rapid COVID-19 surge and plateau (2.38 (95% CI 1.39-3.36) activations per 1000 floor patient-days v. 1.27 (0.82-1.71) during the pre-COVID-19 era; p = 0.02); all-cause RRT rates were not significantly different (5.40 (95% CI 3.94-6.85) v. 4.83 (3.86-5.80) activations per 1000 floor patient-days, respectively; p = 0.52). Throughout the COVID-19 era, respiratory distress accounted for a higher percentage of RRT activations in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 patients (57% vs. 28%, respectively; p = 0.001). During the surge, we adapted RRT guidelines to reduce in-room personnel and standardize personal protective equipment based on COVID-19 status and risk to providers, created decision-support pathways for respiratory emergencies that accounted for COVID-19 status uncertainty, and expanded critical care consultative support to floor teams.

CONCLUSION

Increased frequency and complexity of RRT activations for respiratory distress during the COVID-19 surge prompted the creation of clinical tools and strategies that could be applied to other hospitals.

摘要

目的

确定快速反应团队(RRT)激活情况的变化,并描述在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院人数激增期间所做的机构调整。

方法

利用前瞻性收集的数据,我们比较了2020年3月7日至5月31日(COVID-19时期)与2020年1月1日至3月6日(COVID-19之前时期)我们学术医院RRT呼叫的特征。我们使用负二项回归来测试COVID-19之前和COVID-19时期按楼层(非重症监护病房)住院患者普查标准化的RRT激活率差异,包括COVID-19普查快速激增和平稳期(2020年3月28日至5月2日)的子时期。

结果

在COVID-19快速激增和平稳期,因呼吸窘迫导致的RRT激活显著增加(每1000个楼层患者日有2.38次(95%置信区间1.39 - 3.36)激活,而在COVID-19之前时期为每1000个楼层患者日1.27次(0.82 - 1.71);p = 0.02);全因RRT率无显著差异(分别为每1000个楼层患者日5.40次(95%置信区间3.94 - 6.85)和4.83次(3.86 - 5.80)激活;p = 0.52)。在整个COVID-19时期,COVID-19患者中因呼吸窘迫导致的RRT激活占比高于非COVID-19患者(分别为57%和28%;p = 0.001)。在激增期间,我们调整了RRT指南,以减少病房内人员,并根据COVID-19状态和对医护人员的风险对个人防护装备进行标准化,为考虑到COVID-19状态不确定性的呼吸紧急情况创建了决策支持路径,并扩大了对楼层团队的重症监护咨询支持。

结论

COVID-19激增期间因呼吸窘迫导致的RRT激活频率和复杂性增加,促使创建了可应用于其他医院的临床工具和策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1d/8244551/2e7f9ac5ca9d/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验