Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hee University, Korea.
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Aug;30(6):724-739. doi: 10.1177/09636625211012551. Epub 2021 May 9.
This study sought to determine how the residents of Pohang, Korea, perceive geothermal plants after the 2017 Pohang earthquake by applying social representation theory through a mixed-method approach incorporating qualitative and quantitative research. The residents' perception of the geothermal plant was largely anchored to their perception of nuclear power plants. At the time of the Gyeongju earthquake in 2016, public discourse on nuclear accidents developed and was thereafter perpetuated by the Pohang earthquake victims via cognitive anchoring. The survey results demonstrated that Pohang residents had a significantly negative opinion on geothermal plants regardless of safety, climate change mitigation, and economic factors. Upon analyzing the respondents' energy preferences through factor analysis, geothermal power plants were found to aggregate in the same category as nuclear power plants. This result statistically confirms that Pohang residents associate geothermal power plants with the risk discourse on nuclear power plants.
本研究通过混合方法,结合定性和定量研究,应用社会代表理论,旨在确定韩国浦项市居民在 2017 年浦项地震后对地热发电厂的看法。居民对地热能的看法主要取决于他们对核能的看法。在 2016 年庆州地震时,公众对核事故的讨论逐渐展开,并在浦项地震灾民的认知锚定作用下得以延续。调查结果表明,无论安全、气候变化缓解还是经济因素如何,浦项市居民对地热能的看法都明显持负面态度。通过因子分析对受访者的能源偏好进行分析后发现,地热能与核能被归为同一类别。这一结果从统计学上证实了浦项居民将地热能与核能的风险论述联系在一起。