• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器的再利用:系统评价、荟萃分析和证据体质量评估。

Reuse of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: systematic review, meta-analysis and quality assessment of the body of evidence.

机构信息

Hospital Epidemiology Department - Hospital Infection Control and Health Technology Assessment Department, Clinical Hospital of the University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Life Sciences Department, Bahia State University, Salvador, BA, Brazil.

出版信息

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Jun;18(6):553-567. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1927706. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1080/17434440.2021.1927706
PMID:33969787
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have reduced mortality and improved the quality of life of cardiac patients. However, the high cost of these devices prevents their large-scale incorporation, particularly in low-income countries, where reusing explanted PMs/ICDs has become an alternative.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of studies that compare infection rates, device-related deaths, malfunction and premature battery depletion in patients with reused PM and ICD implants and those with new devices. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis demonstrated no significant intergroup differences in infection rates (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.60-1.60), device malfunction (OR 1.58; 95% CI 0.56-4.48) or premature battery depletion (OR 1.96; 95% CI 0.81-4.72) and no device-related deaths. Based on GRADE assessment, confidence in estimates for the outcomes infection rate and device-related death was rated as moderate.

CONCLUSION

The results of this analysis enabled us to conclude that PMs and ICDs can be safely and effectively reused. As such, every effort should be made to overcome regulatory, technical and ethical barriers to ensure implantation.

摘要

背景

起搏器(PMs)和植入式心律转复除颤器(ICDs)降低了心脏患者的死亡率并提高了生活质量。然而,这些设备的高成本阻碍了它们的大规模应用,尤其是在低收入国家,重新使用已植入的 PM 和 ICD 已成为一种替代方案。

方法

对比较重新使用的 PM 和 ICD 植入患者与新设备患者的感染率、与设备相关的死亡率、故障和电池过早耗尽的发生率的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)框架评估证据体的质量。

结果

荟萃分析显示,感染率(OR 0.98;95%CI 0.60-1.60)、设备故障(OR 1.58;95%CI 0.56-4.48)或电池过早耗尽(OR 1.96;95%CI 0.81-4.72)以及与设备相关的死亡方面,组间无显著差异。基于 GRADE 评估,对感染率和与设备相关的死亡这两个结局的估计的置信度被评为中度。

结论

这项分析的结果使我们能够得出结论,PM 和 ICD 可以安全有效地重复使用。因此,应尽一切努力克服监管、技术和伦理障碍,以确保植入。

相似文献

1
Reuse of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: systematic review, meta-analysis and quality assessment of the body of evidence.起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器的再利用:系统评价、荟萃分析和证据体质量评估。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Jun;18(6):553-567. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1927706. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Performance of re-used pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators compared with new devices at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦格罗特舒尔医院重复使用的心脏起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器与新设备的性能比较。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):181-7. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-048.
3
Cardiac implantable electronic device reutilization: battery life of explanted devices at a tertiary care center.心脏植入式电子设备再利用:三级医疗中心取出设备的电池寿命
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 May;37(5):569-75. doi: 10.1111/pace.12321. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
4
Worldwide pacemaker and defibrillator reuse: Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary trials.全球范围内起搏器和除颤器的再利用:当代试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1500-1507. doi: 10.1111/pace.13488. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
5
Pacemaker and ICD generator malfunctions: analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual reports.起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器发生器故障:食品药品监督管理局年度报告分析
JAMA. 2006 Apr 26;295(16):1901-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.16.1901.
6
Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Pacemakers: A Health Technology Assessment.植入式心脏复律除颤器、心脏再同步治疗及永久性起搏器的远程监测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2018 Oct 24;18(7):1-199. eCollection 2018.
7
Reuse of pacemakers, defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation devices.起搏器、除颤器和心脏再同步化装置的再利用。
Heart Asia. 2017 Jan 23;9(1):30-33. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2016-010828. eCollection 2017.
8
Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort.在一个大型全国队列中,植入起搏器、除颤器和心脏再同步治疗设备后女性与男性的生存率比较
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 10;6(5):e005031. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005031.
9
Management of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and pacemakers who require radiation therapy.对需要放射治疗的植入式心脏复律除颤器和起搏器患者的管理。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Oct;12(10):2148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
10
Sudden Death in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.心脏植入式电子设备患者的猝死。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1342-50. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2641.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety, cost and environmental impact of reprocessing high risk single-use medical devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高风险一次性使用医疗器械再处理的安全性、成本及环境影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2025 Jun 6;20:Doc25. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000554. eCollection 2025.
2
The environmental impact of telemonitoring vs. on-site cardiac follow-up: a mixed-method study.远程监测与现场心脏随访的环境影响:一项混合方法研究。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Feb 26;6(3):496-507. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf012. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Design of a syringe extension device (Chloe SED®) for low-resource settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a circular economy approach.
为撒哈拉以南非洲资源匮乏地区设计的注射器延长装置(Chloe SED®):一种循环经济方法。
Front Med Technol. 2023 Sep 1;5:1183179. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1183179. eCollection 2023.
4
Patients' opinions on cardiac implantable electronic device reuse in Bolivia.玻利维亚患者对心脏植入式电子设备再利用的看法。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;66(2):265-268. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01375-x. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Spanish Rhythm Association member´s perspectives on cardiac implantable electronic device reuse in low- and middle-income countries.西班牙韵律协会成员对在中低收入国家重复使用心脏植入式电子设备的看法。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;66(5):1095-1101. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01304-y. Epub 2022 Jul 15.