Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Am J Surg. 2021 May;221(5):1033-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.041. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Despite evidence of volume-outcome relationships for cancer surgery, treatment at low-volume hospitals remains common. Our objective was to evaluate whether individuals actively involved in selecting their cancer surgeon were more likely to go to hospitals recognized for quality cancer care.
Individuals diagnosed with breast, prostate and colorectal cancer in 2015 completed online surveys in 2017-2018. Participants were categorized as "directed" to a surgeon (relied on referral) or "active" (sought additional information), and hospitals were categorized by NCI-designation, CoC accreditation, and academic affiliation.
Of 299 participants, 42% were active. Individuals with breast cancer were more active (aOR = 2.46,95%CI:1.32-4.59). Active participants had nonsignificantly higher odds of surgery at NCI-designated facilities (aOR = 2.04,95%CI:0.95-4.38), or academic centers (aOR = 1.51,95%CI:0.86-2.64).
While most participants were directed to their cancer surgeon, active participants tended to select NCI-designated/academic hospitals. Although centralization of cancer care would require altering referral patterns, decision-support resources may help patients make informed choices.
尽管癌症手术存在量效关系的证据,但在低容量医院进行治疗的情况仍然很常见。我们的目的是评估积极参与选择癌症外科医生的个体是否更有可能选择质量癌症护理得到认可的医院。
2015 年被诊断患有乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌的个体于 2017-2018 年完成在线调查。参与者被分为“指定”外科医生(依赖转诊)或“主动”(寻求额外信息),医院则根据 NCI 认证、CoC 认证和学术附属关系进行分类。
在 299 名参与者中,42%是主动的。患有乳腺癌的个体更活跃(aOR=2.46,95%CI:1.32-4.59)。主动参与者在 NCI 认证机构(aOR=2.04,95%CI:0.95-4.38)或学术中心(aOR=1.51,95%CI:0.86-2.64)接受手术的可能性略高,但无统计学意义。
尽管大多数参与者被指定给他们的癌症外科医生,但积极的参与者往往选择 NCI 认证/学术医院。尽管癌症治疗的集中化需要改变转诊模式,但决策支持资源可以帮助患者做出明智的选择。