School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center [North], Morgantown, WV, USA.
School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Sep;77(9):3921-3932. doi: 10.1111/jan.14879. Epub 2021 May 10.
To examine the effectiveness of physical activity (PA) interventions on changes in PA among colorectal cancer survivors, including an examination of theoretical versus atheoretical-driven approaches, with a special focus on their effectiveness across ethnic and racial minorities.
Systematic review with aggregated data meta-analyses.
Using six databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL with full text, Scopus and Web of Science), we will screen for randomized controlled trials written in English from May 1, 1993 up to December 31, 2020.
Dual study-selection and data abstraction will be performed. The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) will be used to examine behavior change techniques among selected studies, while the Theory Coding Scheme will be used to assess the extent of theory use. Risk of bias will be assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, while the strength of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation instrument. In addition, intervention delivery will be appraised using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication. Changes in PA from each study will be calculated using the standardized mean difference effect size (Hedge's g). Results will be pooled using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model. Heterogeneity (Cochran's Q) and inconsistency (I ) will be examined, while small-study effects (publication bias) will be evaluated using the Doi plot and LFK Index. Meta-regression will also be conducted to examine for potential associations between changes in physical activity and selected covariates (theoretical versus atheoretical-driven approaches, race/ethnicity).
This systematic review will identify specific racial/ethnic minorities for whom interventions are most effective and summarize the evidence of the effectiveness of theoretical vs. theoretical based intervention.
This systematic review can direct policymakers and practitioners towards actions that are likely to bring about positive physical activity behaviour change.
考察身体活动(PA)干预对结直肠癌幸存者 PA 变化的效果,包括考察理论与非理论驱动方法,特别关注这些方法在族裔和少数族裔中的效果。
系统综述和汇总数据荟萃分析。
使用六个数据库(Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、PsycINFO、全文 CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science),我们将筛选 1993 年 5 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的英文随机对照试验。
将进行双重研究选择和数据提取。行为改变技术分类法(v1)将用于检查选定研究中的行为改变技术,而理论编码方案将用于评估理论使用程度。使用修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,使用推荐评估、制定和评估工具评估证据强度。此外,还将使用干预描述和复制模板评估干预措施的实施情况。使用标准化均数差效应量(Hedge's g)计算每项研究中 PA 的变化。将使用逆方差异质性模型汇总结果。将检查异质性(Cochran's Q)和不一致性(I),并使用 Doi 图和 LFK 指数评估小样本效应(发表偏倚)。还将进行元回归分析,以考察 PA 变化与选定协变量(理论与非理论驱动方法、种族/族裔)之间的潜在关联。
本系统综述将确定干预措施对哪些特定族裔/少数族裔最有效,并总结理论与理论基础干预效果的证据。
本系统综述可以为政策制定者和实践者指明方向,使他们采取可能带来积极的身体活动行为改变的行动。