Faculty of Medicine, Unit of Sports Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0251111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251111. eCollection 2021.
Shoulder rotator cuff tendinopathy is a common debilitating condition that affects a person daily function and the quality of life. Despite its frequent occurrence, the best treatment is still inconclusive. This review assessed the clinical effect of platelet-rich plasma injection for rotator cuff tendinopathy. A systematic literature search was conducted using CINAHL, Medline, SCOPUS, SPORTSDiscus and Web of Science databases to retrieve articles published in peer-reviewed journals until December 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which compared clinical effects of PRP injection to the usual care among adults diagnosed with rotator cuff conditions were reviewed. The main outcomes of interest were changes in shoulder pain symptoms and shoulder functions. All variables were analysed using random effects meta-analyses. Eight RCTs were reviewed in this study. The risk of bias for randomization was low for 6 RCTs, one study had unclear risk and the other was a high risk. Studies vary on the PRP techniques including preparation and injections. Moreover, the control intervention also differs. Four studies compared PRP with normal saline injection while in the remaining 4 RCTs the control intervention were rehabilitation program and dry needling. Meta-analysis of selected studies showed that PRP injection was safe and effective intervention for long-term pain control and shoulder function in patients with RC disorders.
肩袖肌腱病是一种常见的使人虚弱的疾病,会影响人的日常功能和生活质量。尽管它很常见,但最佳治疗方法仍不确定。本综述评估了富血小板血浆注射治疗肩袖肌腱病的临床效果。使用 CINAHL、Medline、SCOPUS、SPORTSDiscus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行系统文献检索,以检索截至 2020 年 12 月在同行评议期刊上发表的文章。综述了比较富血小板血浆注射与成人肩袖疾病常规治疗的临床效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要观察指标是肩部疼痛症状和肩部功能的变化。使用随机效应荟萃分析对所有变量进行分析。本研究共回顾了 8 项 RCT。6 项 RCT 的随机分组偏倚风险较低,1 项研究的风险不确定,其余 1 项风险较高。研究在 PRP 技术,包括准备和注射方面存在差异。此外,对照干预也不同。四项研究将 PRP 与生理盐水注射进行了比较,而在其余四项 RCT 中,对照干预是康复计划和干针治疗。对选定研究的荟萃分析表明,PRP 注射是 RC 疾病患者长期疼痛控制和肩部功能的安全有效干预措施。