Suppr超能文献

两种基于6/10连接的硫化铜簇的有机框架:晶体结构与质子传导

Two 6/10-connected CuS cluster-based organic frameworks: crystal structure and proton conduction.

作者信息

Li Jia-Ming, Xu Tian-Yang, Zhao Ya-Li, Hu Xing-Liang, He Kun-Huan

机构信息

Qinzhou Key Laboratory for Development and Application of High Performance Functional Materials, College of Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535011, People's Republic of China.

School of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Guangxi Normal University, Key Laboratory for the Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources (Ministry of Education), Guilin 541004, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Dalton Trans. 2021 Jun 1;50(21):7484-7495. doi: 10.1039/d1dt00782c.

Abstract

Nowadays, although the exploration of proton conductive materials has ranged from traditional sulfonated polymers to novel crystalline solid materials such as MOFs, COFs, and HOFs, research on crystalline cluster-based organic framework materials is very limited. Here, a pair of homologues Cu(i)-based organic framework containing a Cu12S6 cluster, [Cu12(MES)6(H2O)3]n (1) and {[Cu12(MPS)6(H2O)4]·6H2O}n (2) (H2MES = 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate acid and H2MPS = 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate acid), were hydrothermally synthesized under the same conditions and fully investigated for their proton conduction. Their structures were characterized by means of single-crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis, thermogravimetric analyses, and PXRD measurements. The two MOFs show significant structural differences in the topological fashions. MOF 1 has a three-dimensional network and can be simplified into two topology types: a 10-connected gpu structure with a Schläfli symbol (312·426·57) and a 3,12-connected new topology with a point symbol {3·42}2{310·418·519·614·74·9}. MOF 2 also has a three-dimensional framework and topology as a 6-connected pcu primitive cubic network with a Schläfli symbol {412·63}. The two MOFs show different proton conduction parameters, but both indicate temperature-dependent proton conductive features. Intriguingly, the two MOFs exhibit high water stability and their proton conductivities are 3.63 × 10-5 and 2.75 × 10-5 S cm-1 under 333 K and 98% RH, respectively. The suggested mechanism for the synthesis for 1 and 2, and their proton conductivity performance comparison has been discussed in detail. In addition, Hirshfeld surface and fingerprint analysis on the two MOFs were computed to compare contacts between the molecules, which is essential for analyzing the relationships between their hydrogen bonds and proton conductivity properties.

摘要

如今,尽管质子传导材料的探索范围已从传统的磺化聚合物扩展到新型晶体固体材料,如金属有机框架(MOFs)、共价有机框架(COFs)和氢键有机框架(HOFs),但基于晶体簇的有机框架材料的研究却非常有限。在此,一对含有Cu12S6簇的同系物铜(I)基有机框架,[Cu12(MES)6(H2O)3]n(1)和{[Cu12(MPS)6(H2O)4]·6H2O}n(2)(H2MES = 2-巯基乙磺酸钠和H2MPS = 2-巯基乙磺酸钠),在相同条件下通过水热法合成,并对其质子传导性能进行了全面研究。通过单晶X射线衍射、元素分析、热重分析和粉末X射线衍射测量对它们的结构进行了表征。这两种金属有机框架在拓扑结构上表现出显著差异。金属有机框架1具有三维网络结构,可简化为两种拓扑类型:一种是具有施莱夫利符号(312·426·57)的10连接gpu结构,另一种是具有点符号{3·42}2{310·418·519·614·74·9}的3,12连接新拓扑结构。金属有机框架2也具有三维框架结构,其拓扑结构为具有施莱夫利符号{412·63}的6连接pcu原始立方网络。这两种金属有机框架表现出不同的质子传导参数,但都显示出与温度相关的质子传导特性。有趣的是,这两种金属有机框架具有高水稳定性,在333 K和98%相对湿度下,它们的质子电导率分别为3.63×10-5和2.75×10-5 S cm-1。详细讨论了1和2的合成机制及其质子传导性能比较。此外,还计算了这两种金属有机框架的Hirshfeld表面和指纹分析,以比较分子间的接触情况,这对于分析它们的氢键与质子传导性能之间的关系至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验