Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎患者出现神经病理性疼痛和/或痛觉过敏的患病率。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of neuropathic-like pain and/or pain sensitization in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

School of Medicine, Monash University, Subang Jaya Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021 Aug;29(8):1096-1116. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 May 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of neuropathic-like pain (NP) and pain sensitization (PS) defined by self-report questionnaires in knee and hip osteoarthritis, and whether prevalence is potentially explained by disease-severity or affected joint.

DESIGN

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL were systematically searched (1990-April 2020) for studies describing the prevalence of NP and PS in knee and hip osteoarthritis using self-report questionnaires. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Statistical heterogeneity between studies and sub-groups (affected joint and population source as a proxy for disease severity) was assessed (I statistic and the Chi-squared test).

RESULTS

From 2,706 non-duplicated references, 39 studies were included (2011-2020). Thirty-six studies reported on knee pain and six on hip pain. For knee osteoarthritis, the pooled prevalence of NP was: using PainDETECT, possible NP(score ≥13) 40% (95%CI 32-48%); probable NP(score >18) 20% (95%CI 15-24%); using Self-Report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, 32% (95%CI 26-38%); using Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) 41% (95% CI 24-59%). The prevalence of PS using Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was 36% (95% CI 12-59%). For hip osteoarthritis, the pooled prevalence of NP was: using PainDETECT, possible NP 29% (95%CI 22-37%%); probable NP 9% (95%CI 6-13%); using DN4 22% (95%CI 12-31%) in one study. The prevalence of possible NP pain was higher at the knee (40%) than the hip (29%) (difference 11% (95% CI 0-22%), P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using self-report questionnaire tools, NP was more prevalent in knee than hip osteoarthritis. The prevalence of NP in knee and hip osteoarthritis were similar for each joint regardless of study population source or tool used. Whether defining NP using self-report questionnaires enables more effective targeted therapy in osteoarthritis requires investigation.

摘要

目的

确定通过自我报告问卷定义的膝和髋关节骨关节炎中的神经性疼痛(NP)和痛觉过敏(PS)的患病率,以及患病率是否可能由疾病严重程度或受影响关节来解释。

设计

系统检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL,以获取描述使用自我报告问卷的膝和髋关节骨关节炎中 NP 和 PS 患病率的研究。进行了随机效应荟萃分析。评估了研究之间和亚组之间(受影响的关节和人群来源作为疾病严重程度的替代指标)的统计学异质性(I 统计量和卡方检验)。

结果

从 2706 篇非重复参考文献中,纳入了 39 项研究(2011-2020 年)。36 项研究报告了膝关节疼痛,6 项研究报告了髋关节疼痛。对于膝骨关节炎,NP 的汇总患病率为:使用 PainDETECT,可能的 NP(得分≥13)为 40%(95%CI 32-48%);可能的 NP(得分>18)为 20%(95%CI 15-24%);使用自我报告的利兹神经症状和体征评估,为 32%(95%CI 26-38%);使用 Douleur Neuropathique(DN4)为 41%(95%CI 24-59%)。使用中枢敏化量表(CSI)的 PS 患病率为 36%(95%CI 12-59%)。对于髋骨关节炎,NP 的汇总患病率为:使用 PainDETECT,可能的 NP 为 29%(95%CI 22-37%);可能的 NP 为 9%(95%CI 6-13%);在一项研究中使用 DN4 为 22%(95%CI 12-31%)。膝关节(40%)的 NP 患病率高于髋关节(29%)(差异 11%(95%CI 0-22%),P=0.05)。

结论

使用自我报告问卷工具,膝骨关节炎中的 NP 比髋骨关节炎更常见。无论研究人群来源或使用的工具如何,膝和髋关节骨关节炎的 NP 患病率在每个关节之间相似。使用自我报告问卷定义 NP 是否能使骨关节炎的靶向治疗更有效,这需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验