• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让患者的声音在研究联盟中被听到:来自一个欧盟项目(IMI - APPROACH)的经验

Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH).

作者信息

Taylor Jane, Dekker Sjouke, Jurg Diny, Skandsen Jon, Grossman Maureen, Marijnissen Anne-Karien, Ladel Christoph, Mobasheri Ali, Larkin Jon, Weinans Harrie, Kanter-Schlifke Irene

机构信息

The APPROACH Patient Council, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 10;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0
PMID:33971982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8107424/
Abstract

APPROACH is an EU-wide research consortium with the goal to identify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis to enable future differential diagnosis and treatment. During a 2-year clinical study images, biomarkers and clinical data are collected from people living with knee osteoarthritis and data are analyzed to confirm patterns that can indicate such different subgroups. A Patient Council (PC) has been set up at project initiation and consists of five people from Norway, The Netherlands and UK. Initially, this group of individuals had to learn how to effectively work with each other and with the researchers. Today, the PC is a strong team that is fully integrated in the consortium and acknowledged by researchers as an important sounding board. The article describes this journey looking at formal processes of involvement - organizational structure, budget, meetings - and more informal processes such as building relationships and changing researcher perceptions. It describes how the PC helped improve the experience and engagement of study participants by providing input to the clinical protocol and ensuring effective communication (e.g. through direct interactions with participants and newsletters). Furthermore, the PC is helping with dissemination of results and project advocacy, and overall provides the patient perspective to researchers. Additionally, the authors experienced and describe the intangible benefits such as a shift in researcher attitudes and a sense of community and purpose for PC members. Importantly, learnings reported in this article also include the challenges, such as effective integration of the PC with researchers' work in the early phase of the project. TRIAL REGISTRATION: US National Library of Medicine, NCT03883568 , retrospectively registered 21 March 2019.

摘要

APPROACH是一个全欧盟范围的研究联盟,目标是识别膝关节骨关节炎的不同亚组,以实现未来的鉴别诊断和治疗。在一项为期两年的临床研究中,收集了膝关节骨关节炎患者的图像、生物标志物和临床数据,并对数据进行分析,以确认能够指示这些不同亚组的模式。在项目启动时成立了一个患者委员会(PC),由来自挪威、荷兰和英国的五人组成。最初,这群人必须学习如何彼此之间以及与研究人员有效地合作。如今,患者委员会是一个强大的团队,已完全融入联盟,并被研究人员认可为一个重要的咨询机构。本文描述了这段历程,审视了参与的正式流程——组织结构、预算、会议——以及更非正式的流程,如建立关系和改变研究人员的看法。它描述了患者委员会如何通过为临床方案提供意见并确保有效沟通(例如通过与参与者的直接互动和时事通讯)来帮助改善研究参与者的体验和参与度。此外,患者委员会正在协助结果传播和项目宣传,并总体上为研究人员提供患者视角。此外,作者体验并描述了一些无形的益处,如研究人员态度的转变以及患者委员会成员的社区感和使命感。重要的是,本文报告的经验教训还包括一些挑战,比如在项目早期患者委员会与研究人员工作的有效整合。试验注册:美国国立医学图书馆,NCT03883568,于2019年3月21日追溯注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/16d87150a981/40900_2021_267_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/17fe8c395b65/40900_2021_267_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/4545ea3b98ea/40900_2021_267_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/76133931509f/40900_2021_267_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/a2b7504416c3/40900_2021_267_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/16d87150a981/40900_2021_267_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/17fe8c395b65/40900_2021_267_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/4545ea3b98ea/40900_2021_267_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/76133931509f/40900_2021_267_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/a2b7504416c3/40900_2021_267_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9866/8108366/16d87150a981/40900_2021_267_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH).让患者的声音在研究联盟中被听到:来自一个欧盟项目(IMI - APPROACH)的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 10;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0.
2
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
3
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
4
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.学会协同合作——一项关于公众参与的研究项目反思性分析的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.
5
"PPI? That sounds like Payment Protection Insurance": Reflections and learning from a substance use and homelessness study Experts by Experience group.“PPI?听起来像是支付保护保险”:来自有实际经验的专家小组对一项物质使用与无家可归问题研究的反思与经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 20;7(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00324-8.
6
Exploring the "how" in research partnerships with young partners by experience: lessons learned in six projects from Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.通过经验探索与年轻伙伴建立研究合作关系的“方式”:从加拿大、荷兰和英国的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 17;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00400-7.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Co-learning commentary: a patient partner perspective in mental health care research.共同学习评论:心理健康护理研究中患者伙伴的视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00435-4.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.融入研究协同设计知识与实践:来自澳大利亚一家新研究机构研究人员的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a congenital hyperinsulinism prioritized research agenda: a patient-driven international collaborative research network.制定先天性高胰岛素血症优先研究议程:一个由患者驱动的国际合作研究网络。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 2;16:1549310. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1549310. eCollection 2025.
2
EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners in rheumatology research: 2023 update.EULAR 关于患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究的建议:2023 年更新版。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):1443-1453. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225566.
3
Severity and progression of structural hand OA is not associated with progression of structural knee OA: The IMI-APPROACH cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
Involving research participants in a pan-European research initiative: the EPAD participant panel experience.让研究参与者参与泛欧洲研究计划:EPAD参与者小组的经验。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 15;6:62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00236-z. eCollection 2020.
2
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
Patients as Partners in Research: How to Talk About Compensation With Patient Partners.
手部结构型骨关节炎的严重程度和进展与膝部结构型骨关节炎的进展无关:IMI-APPROACH队列研究。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024 May 14;6(3):100487. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100487. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Patient research partner involvement in rheumatology research: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners.患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究:系统文献回顾为 2023 年更新的 EULAR 患者研究伙伴参与建议提供信息。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep 30;83(10):1268-1277. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225567.
5
Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study.骨关节炎临床试验患者选择的机器学习支持策略的开发与验证:IMI-APPROACH研究
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Aug 18;5(4):100406. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100406. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation.患者和公众参与一项国际风湿病转化研究项目:一项评估
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 22;6(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00311-w.
7
Predicted and actual 2-year structural and pain progression in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort.IMI-APPROACH 膝骨关节炎队列的预测和实际 2 年结构和疼痛进展。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Dec 23;62(1):147-157. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac292.
8
Correction to: Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH).对《让患者声音在研究联盟中被听到:来自一个欧盟项目(IMI - APPROACH)的经验》的更正
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Apr 19;8(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00348-8.
患者作为研究的伙伴:如何与患者伙伴谈论补偿。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Aug;50(8):413-414. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0106.
4
Cohort profile: The Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (IMI-APPROACH) study: a 2-year, European, cohort study to describe, validate and predict phenotypes of osteoarthritis using clinical, imaging and biochemical markers.队列资料简介:应用公私合作研究促进骨关节炎临床进展(IMI-APPROACH)研究:一项为期 2 年的欧洲队列研究,旨在使用临床、影像和生物化学标志物描述、验证和预测骨关节炎表型。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 28;10(7):e035101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035101.
5
Recent advances in the treatment of osteoarthritis.骨关节炎治疗的最新进展
F1000Res. 2020 May 4;9. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22115.1. eCollection 2020.
6
Global, regional and national burden of osteoarthritis 1990-2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家骨关节炎负担 1990-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):819-828. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216515. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions.将 III 期实用临床试验结果传播给参与者:对试验研究者意图的审计。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 2;10(1):e035730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035730.
8
Patients as Partners in Research: It's the Right Thing to Do.患者参与研究:这是正确的做法。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Sep;49(9):623-626. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.0106.
9
'Multimorbidity': an acceptable term for patients or time for a rebrand?“共病”:对患者来说是个可接受的术语,还是需要重新命名的时候了?
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug;69(685):372-373. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704681.
10
Osteoarthritis.骨关节炎。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 27;393(10182):1745-1759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9.