Suppr超能文献

注意力缺陷多动障碍药物随机对照试验中的安慰剂和反安慰剂反应:系统评价与荟萃分析

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised, controlled trials of medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Faraone Stephen V, Newcorn Jeffrey H, Cipriani Andrea, Brandeis Daniel, Kaiser Anna, Hohmann Sarah, Haege Alexander, Cortese Samuele

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry and of Neuroscience and Physiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):212-219. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01134-w. Epub 2021 May 10.

Abstract

The nature and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses to ADHD medications and the extent to which response to active medications and placebo are inter-correlated is unclear. To assess the magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses to ADHD and their association with active treatment response. We searched literature until June 26, 2019, for published/unpublished double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medication. Authors were contacted for additional data. We assessed placebo effects on efficacy and nocebo effects on tolerability using random effects meta-analysis. We assessed the association of study design and patient features with placebo/nocebo response. We analysed 128 RCTs (10,578 children/adolescents and 9175 adults) and found significant and heterogenous placebo effects for all efficacy outcomes, with no publication bias. The placebo effect was greatest for clinician compared with other raters. We found nocebo effects on tolerability outcomes. Efficacy outcomes from most raters showed significant positive correlations between the baseline to endpoint placebo effects and the baseline to endpoint drug effects. Placebo and nocebo effects did not differ among drugs. Baseline severity and type of rating scale influenced the findings. Shared non-specific factors influence response to both placebo and active medication. Although ADHD medications are superior to placebo, and placebo treatment in clinical practice is not feasible, clinicians should attempt to incorporate factors associated with placebo effects into clinical care. Future studies should explore how such effects influence response to medication treatment. Upon publication, data will be available in Mendeley Data: PROSPERO (CRD42019130292).

摘要

对于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)药物的安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的性质及程度,以及活性药物反应与安慰剂反应之间的相互关联程度尚不清楚。为了评估对ADHD的安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的程度及其与活性治疗反应的关联。我们检索了截至2019年6月26日的文献,以查找已发表/未发表的ADHD药物双盲、随机安慰剂对照试验(RCT)。与作者联系以获取更多数据。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析评估了安慰剂对疗效的影响以及反安慰剂对耐受性的影响。我们评估了研究设计和患者特征与安慰剂/反安慰剂反应的关联。我们分析了128项RCT(10578名儿童/青少年和9175名成年人),发现所有疗效结局均存在显著且异质性的安慰剂效应,无发表偏倚。与其他评估者相比,临床医生评估的安慰剂效应最大。我们发现反安慰剂对耐受性结局有影响。大多数评估者的疗效结局显示,从基线到终点的安慰剂效应与从基线到终点的药物效应之间存在显著正相关。不同药物之间的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应无差异。基线严重程度和评分量表类型影响研究结果。共同的非特异性因素影响对安慰剂和活性药物的反应。尽管ADHD药物优于安慰剂,且临床实践中安慰剂治疗不可行,但临床医生应尝试将与安慰剂效应相关的因素纳入临床护理。未来的研究应探索此类效应如何影响药物治疗反应。文章发表后,数据将在Mendeley Data: PROSPERO(CRD42019130292)上提供。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验