Oliva Henrique Nunes Pereira, Prudente Tiago Paiva, Mayerson Talia F, Mignosa Marcella M, Oliva Isabela Oliveira, Potenza Marc N, Jegede Oluwole O, Angarita Gustavo A
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259492. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9492.
The use of stimulant medications has expanded substantially beyond the traditional treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to encompass a variety of other clinical conditions. Understanding the safety of these medications is important as their use increases across diverse patient populations.
To assess the safety of stimulant medications as reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted from July 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025, using CINAHL, Embase, PubMed or MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for studies published since 2000. Keywords included safety, adverse event, side effect, amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, stimulant, lisdexamfetamine, and methylphenidate.
RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and December 13, 2024, were included. These trials investigated the safety of stimulants in various clinical conditions, including ADHD, depression, binge eating disorder, schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, and stimulant use disorders as well as in healthy individuals. Trials not focused on safety or adverse events (AEs) of stimulants, nonoriginal research, nonhuman research, trials with concomitant prescriptions other than stimulants, and trials without a placebo group were excluded.
Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Independent reviewers extracted study data, and a random-effects model was used to pool results. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
The primary outcome was the risk ratio (RR) of developing any AE in participants taking stimulants vs placebo.
A total of 93 RCTs were included after exclusions. The methodological quality assessment of the included trials showed overall low or unclear risk of bias. Trials with a duration of up to 52 weeks showed that stimulant medications were associated with an increased risk of overall AEs compared with placebo (RR, 1.34; 90% CI, 1.27-1.41), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 67%). Statistical significance of this finding was maintained when subgroups (ie, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines) were separately analyzed.
This meta-analysis found an increased risk of overall AEs associated with stimulants compared with placebo. Future research could provide more standardized and consistent assessments of this outcome and may improve understanding about misuse risk.
兴奋剂药物的使用已大幅扩展,超出了注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的传统治疗范围,涵盖了多种其他临床病症。随着这些药物在不同患者群体中的使用增加,了解其安全性至关重要。
评估在调查哌醋甲酯、赖右苯丙胺和其他苯丙胺类药物的随机临床试验(RCT)中报告的兴奋剂药物的安全性。
于2024年7月1日至2025年2月28日进行了全面的文献检索,使用CINAHL、Embase、PubMed或MEDLINE、ScienceDirect和Web of Science检索自2000年以来发表的研究。关键词包括安全性、不良事件、副作用、苯丙胺、右旋苯丙胺、兴奋剂、赖右苯丙胺和哌醋甲酯。
纳入2000年1月1日至2024年12月13日期间发表的RCT。这些试验调查了兴奋剂在各种临床病症中的安全性,包括ADHD、抑郁症、暴饮暴食症、精神分裂症、阿尔茨海默病和兴奋剂使用障碍以及健康个体。未关注兴奋剂安全性或不良事件(AE)的试验、非原创研究、非人体研究、有除兴奋剂外的伴随处方的试验以及没有安慰剂组的试验被排除。
数据提取遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告指南。独立评审员提取研究数据,并使用随机效应模型汇总结果。使用I²统计量评估异质性。
主要结局是服用兴奋剂的参与者与服用安慰剂的参与者发生任何AE的风险比(RR)。
排除后共纳入93项RCT。纳入试验的方法学质量评估显示总体偏倚风险较低或不明确。长达52周的试验表明,与安慰剂相比,兴奋剂药物与总体AE风险增加相关(RR,1.34;90%CI,1.27 - 1.41),异质性较高(I² = 67%)。当分别分析亚组(即哌醋甲酯、赖右苯丙胺和其他苯丙胺类药物)时,这一发现的统计学显著性得以维持。
这项Meta分析发现,与安慰剂相比,兴奋剂与总体AE风险增加相关。未来的研究可以对这一结局提供更标准化和一致的评估,并可能增进对滥用风险的理解。