• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经验、攻击性和鸡冠大小对雄性家禽争斗成功的影响。

Effects of social experience, aggressiveness and comb size on contest success in male domestic fowl.

作者信息

Favati Anna, Løvlie Hanne, Leimar Olof

机构信息

Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Feb 3;8(2):201213. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201213.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.201213
PMID:33972851
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8074635/
Abstract

The ability to dominate conspecifics and thereby gain access to resources depends on a number of traits and skills. Experience of dominance relationships during development is a potential source of learning such skills. We here study the importance of social experience, aggressiveness and morphological traits for competitiveness in social interactions (contest success) in male domestic fowl (). We let males grow up either as a single (dominant) male or as an intermediately ranked male in a group of males, and measured their success in duels against different opponents. We found that single-raised males had lower contest success than group-raised males, and that aggression and comb size correlated positively with contest success. This indicates that experience of dominance interactions with other males increases future success in duels. We similarly studied the consequences of growing up as a dominant or subordinate in a pair of males, finding no statistically significant effect of the dominance position on contest success. Finally, we found that males were consistent over time in contest success. We conclude that social experience increases contest success in male domestic fowl, but that certain behavioural and morphological characteristics have an equal or even stronger covariation with contest success.

摘要

在同种动物中占据主导地位并借此获取资源的能力取决于多种特征和技能。在发育过程中对支配关系的体验是学习此类技能的一个潜在来源。我们在此研究社会经验、攻击性和形态特征对雄性家禽在社会互动中的竞争力(争斗成功)的重要性。我们让雄性家禽要么作为单独的(占主导地位的)雄性长大,要么在一群雄性中作为排名中等的雄性长大,并测量它们在与不同对手决斗中的成功率。我们发现单独饲养的雄性在争斗中成功的几率低于群体饲养的雄性,而且攻击性和鸡冠大小与争斗成功呈正相关。这表明与其他雄性的支配性互动经验会增加未来在决斗中的成功率。我们同样研究了在一对雄性中作为主导或从属长大的后果,发现支配地位对决斗成功没有统计学上的显著影响。最后,我们发现雄性在争斗成功方面随时间保持一致。我们得出结论,社会经验会提高雄性家禽在争斗中的成功率,但某些行为和形态特征与争斗成功具有同等甚至更强的协变关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/009d85b6ffb6/rsos201213f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/7274556a6bcf/rsos201213f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/7017b0224c58/rsos201213f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/c0b33d5a8d08/rsos201213f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/009d85b6ffb6/rsos201213f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/7274556a6bcf/rsos201213f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/7017b0224c58/rsos201213f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/c0b33d5a8d08/rsos201213f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/8074635/009d85b6ffb6/rsos201213f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of social experience, aggressiveness and comb size on contest success in male domestic fowl.社会经验、攻击性和鸡冠大小对雄性家禽争斗成功的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Feb 3;8(2):201213. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201213.
2
Personality predicts social dominance in male domestic fowl.个性决定雄性家禽在群体中的主导地位。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 29;9(7):e103535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103535. eCollection 2014.
3
Shaking the myth: Body mass, aggression, steroid hormones, and social dominance in wild house mouse.打破神话:野生家鼠的体重、攻击性、类固醇激素与社会等级
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015 Nov 1;223:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.09.033. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
4
Sexual selection in gallus: Effects of morphology and dominance on female spatial behavior.家鸡的性选择:形态和优势地位对雌性空间行为的影响。
Behav Processes. 1985 Aug;11(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(85)90060-9.
5
Personality and physiological traits predict contest interactions in Kryptolebias marmoratus.个性和生理特征可预测红树鳉的竞争互动。
Behav Processes. 2020 Apr;173:104079. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104079. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
Behavioral and hormonal correlates of social dominance in stable and disrupted groups of male domestic fowl.稳定和不稳定的雄性家禽群体中社会优势地位的行为与激素关联
Horm Behav. 1991 Mar;25(1):112-22. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(91)90043-h.
7
Plasticity in reproductive phenotypes reveals status-specific correlations between behavioral, morphological, and physiological sexual traits.生殖表型的可塑性揭示了行为、形态和生理性特征之间特定状态的相关性。
Evolution. 2008 May;62(5):1149-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00346.x. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
8
The interaction of dominance status and supplemental tryptophan on aggression in Gallus domesticus males.家鸡雄性中优势地位与补充色氨酸对攻击性的相互作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991 Mar;38(3):587-91. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90018-w.
9
Social competitiveness associated with rapid fluctuations in sperm quality in male fowl.雄性家禽精子质量快速波动与社会竞争力的关系。
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):853-60. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0080.
10
Sexual dimorphism in ritualized agonistic behaviour, fighting ability and contest costs of Sus scrofa.野猪仪式化争斗行为、战斗能力及竞争成本中的两性差异。
Front Zool. 2022 Mar 12;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12983-022-00458-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic Signatures of Competitive Performance in Burmese Gamecocks: A Transcriptomic Analysis.缅甸斗鸡竞技性能的遗传特征:一项转录组分析
Biology (Basel). 2025 Aug 16;14(8):1066. doi: 10.3390/biology14081066.
2
Analysis of comb morphology in Sichuan Mountaineous Black-bone chickens and its correlation with growth performance.四川山地乌骨鸡鸡冠形态分析及其与生长性能的相关性
Poult Sci. 2025 Jul;104(7):105168. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105168. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
3
Sexual conflict and social networks in bed bugs: effects of social experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Advantages of social skills for contest resolution.社交技能在解决冲突方面的优势。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 May 29;6(5):181456. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181456. eCollection 2019 May.
2
The role of skill in animal contests: a neglected component of fighting ability.技能在动物争斗中的作用:战斗能力中被忽视的一个组成部分。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1596.
3
Pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection favor aggressive, young males in polyandrous groups of red junglefowl.在原鸡的多配偶群体中,交配前和交配后的性选择有利于具有攻击性的年轻雄性。
臭虫的性冲突与社会网络:社会经历的影响
Behav Ecol. 2024 Apr 17;35(3):arae030. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae030. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
4
Social behavior in farm animals: Applying fundamental theory to improve animal welfare.农场动物的社会行为:应用基础理论改善动物福利。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 12;9:932217. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.932217. eCollection 2022.
5
Fighting over defense chemicals disrupts mating behavior.争夺防御性化学物质会扰乱交配行为。
Behav Ecol. 2021 Dec 31;33(2):329-335. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arab117. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
Evolution. 2017 Jun;71(6):1653-1669. doi: 10.1111/evo.13242. Epub 2017 May 5.
4
Exploration is dependent on reproductive state, not social state, in a cooperatively breeding bird.在一种合作繁殖的鸟类中,探索行为取决于繁殖状态,而非社会状态。
Behav Ecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;27(6):1889-1896. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw119. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
5
Repeated, Intermittent Social Defeat across the Entire Juvenile Period Resulted in Behavioral, Physiological, Hormonal, Immunological, and Neurochemical Alterations in Young Adult Male Golden Hamsters.在整个幼年时期反复、间歇性地遭受社会挫败会导致成年雄性金黄仓鼠出现行为、生理、激素、免疫和神经化学变化。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun 10;10:110. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00110. eCollection 2016.
6
Early experience affects adult personality in the red junglefowl: A role for cognitive stimulation?早期经历对原鸡成年后的个性有影响:认知刺激起作用了吗?
Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
7
The making of winners (and losers): how early dominance interactions determine adult social structure in a clonal fish.胜者(与败者)的形成:早期优势互动如何决定一种克隆鱼的成年社会结构。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 May 11;283(1830). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0183.
8
Neurogenomic mechanisms of social plasticity.社会可塑性的神经基因组机制。
J Exp Biol. 2015 Jan 1;218(Pt 1):140-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.106997.
9
Interacting personalities: behavioural ecology meets quantitative genetics.相互作用的个性:行为生态学与数量遗传学相遇。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Feb;30(2):88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
10
Animal personality and state-behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists.动物个性与状态-行为反馈:经验主义者的综述与指南。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;30(1):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 8.