Suppr超能文献

一项奥法妥木单抗联合苯达莫司汀治疗利妥昔单抗难治性 iNHL 的 3 期随机研究(COMPLEMENT A+B 研究)。

A phase 3, randomized study of ofatumumab combined with bendamustine in rituximab-refractory iNHL (COMPLEMENT A + B study).

机构信息

Department for Haematology, Clinic for Haematology and Medical Oncology, Justus-Liebig University-Hospital, Gießen, Germany.

Department of Haematology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2021 Jun;193(6):1123-1133. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17420. Epub 2021 May 10.

Abstract

The standard of care for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) is rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, with/without chemotherapy. However, multiple relapses are common in these patients. This phase 3, randomized study compared outcomes of a combination of ofatumumab (a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody) and bendamustine, with bendamustine alone in patients unresponsive to prior rituximab-based treatment. Overall, 346 patients were randomized to receive either the combination or bendamustine alone. Bendamustine was given for ≤8 cycles and ofatumumab for ≤12 cycles. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) after 215 protocol-defined events assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Median IRC-assessed PFS was 16·7 and 13·8 months in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0·82; P = 0·1390]. Median overall survival (OS) was 58·2 and 51·8 months in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively (HR = 0·89, P = 0·4968). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Overall, 73% and 80% of patients in the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively, experienced a ≥grade 3 adverse event. The study did not meet its primary end-point. No significant improvement in PFS and OS was seen with the combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine as compared with bendamustine alone in rituximab-refractory iNHL (NCT01077518).

摘要

惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(iNHL)的标准治疗方法是利妥昔单抗,一种抗 CD20 抗体,联合/不联合化疗。然而,这些患者经常会出现多次复发。这项 3 期、随机研究比较了奥法木单抗(第二代抗 CD20 抗体)联合苯达莫司汀与苯达莫司汀单药治疗对先前基于利妥昔单抗治疗无反应的患者的疗效。共有 346 名患者被随机分配接受联合治疗或苯达莫司汀单药治疗。苯达莫司汀最多用 8 个周期,奥法木单抗最多用 12 个周期。主要终点是独立审查委员会(IRC)评估的 215 例方案定义的事件后无进展生存(PFS)。IRC 评估的联合治疗组和单药治疗组的中位 PFS 分别为 16.7 个月和 13.8 个月[风险比(HR)=0.82;P=0.1390]。联合治疗组和单药治疗组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为 58.2 个月和 51.8 个月(HR=0.89,P=0.4968)。安全性特征与之前的报告一致。联合治疗组和单药治疗组分别有 73%和 80%的患者发生≥3 级不良事件。该研究未达到主要终点。与苯达莫司汀单药治疗相比,奥法木单抗联合苯达莫司汀在利妥昔单抗耐药的 iNHL 中并未显著改善 PFS 和 OS(NCT01077518)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验