Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Res Aging. 2022 Feb;44(2):186-204. doi: 10.1177/01640275211008583. Epub 2021 May 11.
Age is the most common predictor of hearing loss; however, many older adults are not screened. Hearing screening could improve healthcare access, participation, and outcomes. Establishing whether hearing screening in older adults is cost-effective could improve the availability and utilization of screening.
We searched nine databases in January 2020. Studies with populations aged 50+ and provided data on the cost-effectiveness of hearing screening were included in the review.
Five studies met the inclusion criteria and all found hearing screening programs to be cost-effective compared to no hearing screening, regardless of screening method (i.e., instrument or strategy). The maximum number of repeated screenings, coupled with younger ages, was most cost-effective.
This review suggests that hearing screening in older adults is cost-effective, however, the evidence is limited. There is pressing need for research focused on economic impacts of hearing healthcare in older adults to inform research, policy and practice.
年龄是听力损失最常见的预测因素;然而,许多老年人并未接受筛查。听力筛查可以改善医疗保健的可及性、参与度和结果。确定老年人的听力筛查是否具有成本效益,可以提高筛查的可利用性和使用率。
我们于 2020 年 1 月在九个数据库中进行了检索。本综述纳入了研究人群为 50 岁及以上、并提供听力筛查成本效益数据的研究。
有五项研究符合纳入标准,所有研究都发现,无论筛查方法(即仪器或策略)如何,与不进行听力筛查相比,听力筛查计划都具有成本效益。重复筛查的最大次数,加上年龄较小,是最具成本效益的。
本综述表明,老年人的听力筛查具有成本效益,但证据有限。迫切需要针对老年人听力保健的经济影响进行研究,以为研究、政策和实践提供信息。