• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科肿瘤委员会决策观察量表(MODe-Lite)短版的制定与验证。

Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

School of Allied Health, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7577-7588. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7. Epub 2021 May 11.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7
PMID:33974197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8519835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based tools are necessary for scientifically improving the way MTBs work. Such tools are available but can be difficult to use. This study aimed to develop a robust observational assessment tool for use on cancer multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) by health care professionals in everyday practice.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the United Kingdom from September 2015 to July 2016. Three tumor boards from three teaching hospitals were recruited, with 44 members overall. Six weekly meetings involving 146 consecutive cases were video-recorded and scored using the validated MODe tool. Data were subjected to reliability and validity analysis in the current study to develop a shorter version of the MODe.

RESULTS

Phase 1, a reduction of the original items in the MODe, was achieved through two focus group meetings with expert assessors based on previous research. The 12 original items were reduced to 6 domains, receiving full agreement by the assessors. In phase 2, the six domains were subjected to item reliability, convergent validation, and internal consistency testing against the MODe-Lite global score, the MODe global score, and the items of the MODe. Significant positive correlations were evident across all domains (p < 0.01), indicating good reliability and validity. In phase 3, feasibility and high inter-assessor reliability were achieved by two clinical assessors. Six domains measuring clinical input, holistic input, clinical collaboration, pathology, radiology, and management plan were integrated into MODe-Lite.

CONCLUSIONS

As an evidence-based tool for health care professionals in everyday practice, MODe-Lite gives cancer MTBs insight into the way they work and facilitates improvements in practice.

摘要

背景

循证工具对于科学地改进 MTB 的工作方式是必要的。这类工具是可用的,但可能难以使用。本研究旨在为医疗保健专业人员在日常实践中开发一种用于癌症多学科肿瘤委员会(MTB)的强大观察评估工具。

方法

本研究为 2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 7 月在英国进行的回顾性横断面观察研究。从三家教学医院招募了三个肿瘤委员会,共有 44 名成员。每周六次会议,共涉及 146 例连续病例,使用经过验证的 MODe 工具进行视频评分。在本研究中,对数据进行了可靠性和有效性分析,以开发 MODe 的简短版本。

结果

第 1 阶段,通过对基于先前研究的专家评估者进行两次焦点小组会议,实现了 MODe 原始项目的减少。最初的 12 个项目减少到 6 个领域,评估者完全同意。在第 2 阶段,对六个领域进行了项目可靠性、收敛验证和内部一致性测试,以评估与 MODe-Lite 整体评分、MODe 整体评分和 MODe 项目的一致性。所有领域都显示出显著的正相关(p<0.01),表明具有良好的可靠性和有效性。在第 3 阶段,两名临床评估者实现了可行性和高评估者间可靠性。6 个领域,包括临床输入、整体输入、临床协作、病理学、影像学和管理计划,被整合到 MODe-Lite 中。

结论

作为一种循证工具,MODe-Lite 为医疗保健专业人员在日常实践中提供了对其工作方式的深入了解,并促进了实践的改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/8519835/1b8cb561eb6a/10434_2021_9989_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/8519835/60614209db4f/10434_2021_9989_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/8519835/1b8cb561eb6a/10434_2021_9989_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/8519835/60614209db4f/10434_2021_9989_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/8519835/1b8cb561eb6a/10434_2021_9989_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite.多学科肿瘤委员会决策观察量表(MODe-Lite)短版的制定与验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7577-7588. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.评估手术室受训者的手术技能:一种前瞻性观察研究方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta15010.
3
Validation of team performance assessment of multidisciplinary tumor boards.多学科肿瘤委员会团队绩效评估的验证。
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):891-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
4
The development and validation of a shorter version of the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Questionnaire (CANHELP Lite): a novel tool to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care.开发并验证了加拿大卫生保健评估项目问卷(CANHELP Lite)的简化版:一种用于衡量患者和家属对临终关怀满意度的新工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
5
A measure of case complexity for streamlining workflow in multidisciplinary tumor boards: Mixed methods development and early validation of the MeDiC tool.一种用于简化多学科肿瘤委员会工作流程的病例复杂性衡量标准:MeDiC 工具的混合方法开发和早期验证。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(14):5143-5154. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3026. Epub 2020 May 31.
6
The anatomy of clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer meetings: A cross-sectional observational study of teams in a natural context.多学科癌症会议中临床决策的剖析:一项在自然环境下对团队的横断面观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3885. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003885.
7
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.
8
Quality of leadership in multidisciplinary cancer tumor boards: development and evaluation of a leadership assessment instrument (ATLAS).多学科癌症肿瘤委员会的领导力质量:领导力评估工具(ATLAS)的开发和评估。
World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1031-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2255-1. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
9
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
10
[Sinicization, cross-cultural adjustment and reliability and validity test of the Burnt Hand Outcome Tool].《烧伤手部结局工具的中国化、跨文化调适及信效度检验》
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 20;37(10):978-986. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210201-00042.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole slide imaging (WSI) scanner differences influence optical and computed properties of digitized prostate cancer histology.全切片成像(WSI)扫描仪的差异会影响数字化前列腺癌组织学的光学和计算属性。
J Pathol Inform. 2023 Jul 4;14:100321. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100321. eCollection 2023.
2
Quality and efficacy of Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) quality assessment tools and discussion checklists: a systematic review.多学科团队(MDT)质量评估工具和讨论清单的质量和效果:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09369-8.
3
ASO Author Reflections: The Pursuit of Digitalised Quality Improvement Assessment Tools for Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams.

本文引用的文献

1
A multicentre cross-sectional observational study of cancer multidisciplinary teams: Analysis of team decision making.多中心横断面观察性研究癌症多学科团队:团队决策分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):7083-7099. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3366. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
ASO作者反思:为癌症多学科团队寻求数字化质量改进评估工具
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7589-7590. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09988-8. Epub 2021 Apr 20.