Suppr超能文献

静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合在系统性溶栓后肺栓塞中的应用。

Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Pulmonary Embolism after Systemic Thrombolysis.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Summer;34(2):549-557. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 May 8.

Abstract

Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality. Both systemic thrombolytics and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have been used in the management of massive PE. However, the safety of VA- ECMO in the setting of recent thrombolytic administration is not clear. The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcomes of patients who received VA-ECMO in the setting of systemic thrombolytics (ST). A single institution retrospective study of PE patients treated with VA-ECMO between December 2015 and December 2020 was performed. Patients who received ST were compared with those who did not receive ST. Outcomes, including mortality, major bleeding, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy, and length of hospital stay, were compared. A total of 83 patients with PE required VA-ECMO support and 18 of these received systemic thrombolytics. There was no statistically significant difference in survival to discharge between the patients who received ST compared with those who did not (88.9% vs 84.6%; p = 0.94). Major bleeding events occurred more often in patients who received ST (61.1% vs 26.2%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in time on mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy, or length of stay between the groups. Reasonable survival can be achieved despite an increased frequency of major bleeding events in patients that receive ST prior to VA-ECMO for PE. ST administration should not be considered an absolute contraindication to VA-ECMO. Further multi-center studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

摘要

大面积肺栓塞(PE)是一种危及生命的疾病,死亡率很高。全身溶栓和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)都已用于治疗大面积 PE。然而,在最近溶栓治疗的情况下使用 VA-ECMO 的安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在分析在全身溶栓(ST)治疗背景下接受 VA-ECMO 的患者的结局。对 2015 年 12 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受 VA-ECMO 治疗的 PE 患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。比较了接受 ST 的患者与未接受 ST 的患者。比较了死亡率、大出血、机械通气时间、需要肾脏替代治疗和住院时间等结局。共有 83 例 PE 患者需要 VA-ECMO 支持,其中 18 例接受了全身溶栓治疗。与未接受 ST 的患者相比,接受 ST 的患者的出院存活率无统计学差异(88.9%对 84.6%;p=0.94)。接受 ST 的患者大出血事件发生率更高(61.1%对 26.2%;p=0.01)。两组之间在机械通气时间、需要肾脏替代治疗或住院时间方面无显著差异。尽管在接受 VA-ECMO 治疗 PE 之前接受 ST 的患者大出血事件发生率增加,但仍可实现合理的生存。ST 给药不应被视为 VA-ECMO 的绝对禁忌证。需要进一步的多中心研究来证实这些发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验