• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗凝治疗与脾损伤患者死亡率升高相关。

Anticoagulation is Associated with Increased Mortality in Splenic Injuries.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Division of General Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.002
PMID:33975026
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anticoagulation (AC) is associated with worse outcomes after trauma in some but not all studies. To further investigate the effect of AC on outcomes in patients with splenic injury, we analyzed the Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use File (PUF) METHODS: The 2017 PUF was used to identify adult (18+ y) with all mechanisms and grades of splenic injury. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital course and outcomes were compared between AC and non-AC patients.

RESULTS

A total of 18,749 patients were included, 622 were on AC. The AC patients were older but had comparable gender composition to non-AC patients. Injury Severity Score (18.2 versus 22.5) and rates of serious (AIS ≥ 3) injury were all lower in the AC group (P = 0.001). AC patients received fewer units of RBC (5.7 versus 8.0 units, P < 0.001) and FFP (3.9 versus 5.4 units, P < 0.001) in the first 24 h but underwent angiography at similar rates (23.6 versus 24.5%, P = 0.8). Among those who underwent angiography, patients were more likely to undergo embolization if they were on AC (89.7 versus 73.9%, P = 0.04). Rates of splenic surgery were comparable (19.3 versus 21.5%, P = 0.2) between AC versus non-AC patients. Median LOS was longer in AC patients (6.3 versus 5.6 d, P = 0.002). AC patients had a higher mortality (13.3 versus 7.0%, P = 0.001). In a multivariable binary logistic regression, AC was an independent risk factor for mortality with OR 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.9) CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation is associated with increased mortality in patients with splenic injury.

摘要

简介

在一些研究中,但不是所有研究中,抗凝(AC)与创伤后不良结局相关。为了进一步研究 AC 对脾损伤患者结局的影响,我们分析了创伤质量计划参与者使用文件(PUF)

方法

使用 2017 年 PUF 确定所有机制和脾损伤程度的成年(18+岁)患者。比较 AC 与非 AC 患者的人口统计学、合并症、住院过程和结局。

结果

共纳入 18749 例患者,其中 622 例患者接受 AC。AC 患者年龄较大,但与非 AC 患者的性别构成比相似。AC 组的损伤严重度评分(18.2 与 22.5)和严重损伤(AIS ≥ 3)发生率均较低(P = 0.001)。AC 患者在 24 小时内接受的 RBC(5.7 与 8.0 单位,P < 0.001)和 FFP(3.9 与 5.4 单位,P < 0.001)较少,但接受血管造影的比例相似(23.6 与 24.5%,P = 0.8)。在接受血管造影的患者中,如果接受 AC,则更有可能进行栓塞(89.7 与 73.9%,P = 0.04)。AC 与非 AC 患者的脾切除术率相似(19.3 与 21.5%,P = 0.2)。AC 患者的中位 LOS 较长(6.3 与 5.6 天,P = 0.002)。AC 患者的死亡率更高(13.3 与 7.0%,P = 0.001)。在多变量二项逻辑回归中,AC 是死亡率的独立危险因素,OR 为 1.4(95%CI:1.1-1.9)

结论

抗凝与脾损伤患者的死亡率增加相关。

相似文献

1
Anticoagulation is Associated with Increased Mortality in Splenic Injuries.抗凝治疗与脾损伤患者死亡率升高相关。
J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
The effect of anticoagulation on outcomes after liver and spleen injuries: A research consortium of New England centers for trauma (ReCONECT) study.抗凝治疗对肝脾损伤后结局的影响:新英格兰创伤中心研究联盟(ReCONECT)研究。
Injury. 2020 Sep;51(9):1994-1998. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Risk Factors for Failure of Splenic Angioembolization: A Multicenter Study of Level I Trauma Centers.脾动脉栓塞术失败的风险因素:I 级创伤中心的多中心研究。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.058. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
Emergency Management of Blunt Splenic Injury in Hypotensive Patients : Total Splenectomy Versus Splenic Angioembolization.低血压患者钝性脾损伤的急诊处理:全脾切除术与脾血管栓塞术对比
Am Surg. 2020 Jun;86(6):690-694. doi: 10.1177/0003134820923325.
5
Recent trends in 30-day mortality in patients with blunt splenic injury: A nationwide trauma database study in Japan.钝性脾损伤患者30天死亡率的近期趋势:日本一项全国性创伤数据库研究
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184690. eCollection 2017.
6
Proximal splenic angioembolization does not improve outcomes in treating blunt splenic injuries compared with splenectomy: a cohort analysis.与脾切除术相比,近端脾血管栓塞术在治疗钝性脾损伤方面并不能改善治疗效果:一项队列分析。
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1346-51; discussion 1351-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818c29ea.
7
Predicting the Outcome of Non-operative Management of Splenic Trauma in South Africa.预测南非非手术治疗脾外伤的结果。
World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1485-1491. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05370-z.
8
Failure of Nonoperative Management of Splenic Injuries in Trauma Patients on Anticoagulation.创伤患者抗凝治疗中脾损伤非手术治疗的失败
Am Surg. 2019 Aug 1;85(8):848-850.
9
Observation Versus Embolization in Patients with Blunt Splenic Injury After Trauma: A Propensity Score Analysis.创伤后钝性脾损伤患者观察与栓塞治疗的倾向评分分析
World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1264-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3387-8.
10
Blunt aortic injury with concomitant intra-abdominal solid organ injury: treatment priorities revisited.钝性主动脉损伤合并腹内实性器官损伤:重新审视治疗优先级
J Trauma. 2002 Sep;53(3):442-5; discussion 445. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200209000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of Abdominal Cross-Sectional Imaging in Motor Vehicle Accidents in an Inner City Trauma Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.腹部横断面成像在市中心创伤中心机动车事故中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 10;16(11):e73386. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73386. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Management of blunt splenic injury: down the rabbit hole and into the bucket.钝性脾损伤的处理:深入探究与全面应对
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Apr 6;8(Suppl 1):e001119. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001119. eCollection 2023.
3
An unusual case of a traumatic splenic rupture masquerading as myocardial ischemia: a case report.
一例伪装成心肌缺血的创伤性脾破裂罕见病例:病例报告
Int J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 17;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12245-022-00469-7.