Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
House of Ruth Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP17036-NP17051. doi: 10.1177/08862605211015223. Epub 2021 May 11.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) frequently leads to housing instability and homelessness among survivors. While the client populations of many housing support programs are likely to include IPV survivors who have unique safety needs, the organizational readiness of these housing providers to identify and support IPV survivors is not clear. This study assessed organizational readiness for IPV response among Rapid Re-Housing (RRH) and Transitional Housing (TH) providers in Maryland, whose client populations include women ( = 32). We adapted the Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) to create the Housing provider Readiness to Manage IPV Survey (H-REMIS), inclusive of IPV-related perceptions, policies, staff training and capability, and resources. The 12-point H-REMIS demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.748). Descriptive and comparative analyses domains by IPV-specific ( = 4) and general ( = 28) housing providers assessed readiness and identified areas for improvement. IPV-specific providers had higher mean organizational readiness for IPV response scores relative to non-IPV specific providers (11.3 and 7.5, respectively). High readiness areas included perceiving the importance of IPV and staff having adequate time, space, and comfort level to address IPV. Areas of low readiness included development and use of IPV response policies as well as staff training on IPV. This assessment documents concerning gaps in organizational readiness for IPV response among supportive housing providers, and pinpoints areas where training and capacity building can be most valuable. The process of improving readiness in the supportive housing sector must involve capacity building and a systems-level approach in order to ensure that all supportive housing providers are prepared to meet the needs of IPV survivors among their client population.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)经常导致幸存者住房不稳定和无家可归。虽然许多住房支持计划的客户群体可能包括具有独特安全需求的 IPV 幸存者,但这些住房提供者识别和支持 IPV 幸存者的组织准备情况尚不清楚。本研究评估了马里兰州快速再安置(RRH)和过渡性住房(TH)提供者对 IPV 反应的组织准备情况,其客户群体包括妇女(n = 32)。我们改编了医生准备管理亲密伴侣暴力调查(PREMIS),创建了住房提供者准备管理 IPV 调查(H-REMIS),包括与 IPV 相关的认知、政策、员工培训和能力以及资源。12 点 H-REMIS 表现出可接受的内部一致性可靠性(Cronbach's α = 0.748)。通过 IPV 特定(n = 4)和一般(n = 28)住房提供者的描述性和比较分析领域,评估了准备情况并确定了需要改进的领域。与非 IPV 特定提供者相比,IPV 特定提供者对 IPV 反应的组织准备程度更高(分别为 11.3 和 7.5)。高准备程度的领域包括认识到 IPV 的重要性以及工作人员有足够的时间、空间和舒适度来解决 IPV 问题。低准备程度的领域包括制定和使用 IPV 反应政策以及工作人员接受有关 IPV 的培训。这项评估记录了支持性住房提供者在 IPV 反应方面组织准备不足的令人担忧的差距,并指出了培训和能力建设最有价值的领域。在支持性住房部门提高准备程度的过程必须涉及能力建设和系统层面的方法,以确保所有支持性住房提供者都准备好满足其客户群体中 IPV 幸存者的需求。