• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豺群规模变化:评估猎物可获得性和顶级捕食者的影响

Dhole pack size variation: Assessing the effect of Prey availability and Apex predator.

作者信息

Bhandari Aishwarya, Ghaskadbi Pallavi, Nigam Parag, Habib Bilal

机构信息

Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology Wildlife Institute of India Dehradun India.

Department of Wildlife Health and Management Wildlife Institute of India Dehradun India.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 23;11(9):4774-4785. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7380. eCollection 2021 May.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.7380
PMID:33976847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8093734/
Abstract

In multipredator systems, group sizes of social carnivores are shaped by the asymmetric intraguild interactions. Subordinate social carnivores experience low recruitment rates as an outcome of predation pressure. In South and Southeast Asia, the Tiger (), Dhole (), and Leopard () form a widely distributed sympatric guild of large carnivores, wherein tigers are the apex predators followed by dhole and leopard. In this study, we attempted to understand the variation in pack size of a social carnivore, the dhole, at two neighboring sites in the Central Indian landscape. We further evaluated local-scale patterns of variation in pack size at a larger scale by doing a distribution-wide assessment across the dhole ranging countries. At the local scale, we found an inverse relationship between the density of tiger and pack size of dhole while accounting for variability in resources and habitat heterogeneity. Larger dhole packs (16.8 ± 3.1) were observed at the site where the tiger density was low (0.46/100 km), whereas a smaller pack size (6.4 ± 1.3) was observed in the site with high tiger density (5.36/100 km). Our results for the distribution-wide assessment were concordant with local-scale results, showing a negative association of pack size with the tiger densities (effect size -0.77) and a positive association with the prey abundance (effect size 0.64). The study advances our understanding to answer the age-old question of "what drives the pack size of social predators in a multipredator system?" This study also highlights the importance of understanding demographic responses of subordinate predator for varying competitor densities, often helpful in making informed decisions for conservation and management strategies such as population recovery and translocation of species.

摘要

在多捕食者系统中,群居食肉动物的群体规模受种内不对称相互作用的影响。从属群居食肉动物由于捕食压力而导致招募率较低。在南亚和东南亚,老虎()、豺()和豹()构成了一个分布广泛的大型食肉动物同域群落,其中老虎是顶级捕食者,其次是豺和豹。在本研究中,我们试图了解群居食肉动物豺在印度中部景观中两个相邻地点的群体规模变化。我们还通过对豺分布范围内的国家进行全面评估,在更大尺度上进一步评估了群体规模变化的局部尺度模式。在局部尺度上,在考虑资源变异性和栖息地异质性的情况下,我们发现老虎密度与豺的群体规模之间存在负相关关系。在老虎密度较低(0.46/100平方公里)的地点观察到较大的豺群(16.8 ± 3.1),而在老虎密度较高(5.36/100平方公里)的地点观察到较小的群体规模(6.4 ± 1.3)。我们的全面评估结果与局部尺度结果一致,表明群体规模与老虎密度呈负相关(效应大小为-0.77),与猎物丰度呈正相关(效应大小为0.64)。这项研究推进了我们对“在多捕食者系统中,是什么驱动群居捕食者的群体规模?”这一古老问题的理解。这项研究还强调了了解从属捕食者对不同竞争密度的种群统计学反应的重要性,这通常有助于为保护和管理策略(如物种的种群恢复和迁移)做出明智决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/32eb8cd1fa65/ECE3-11-4774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/41e8ef69a4b0/ECE3-11-4774-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/9d7291776fd1/ECE3-11-4774-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/aed076c43343/ECE3-11-4774-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/abd9f14d4b8f/ECE3-11-4774-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/f8e1a58ecd9a/ECE3-11-4774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/32eb8cd1fa65/ECE3-11-4774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/41e8ef69a4b0/ECE3-11-4774-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/9d7291776fd1/ECE3-11-4774-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/aed076c43343/ECE3-11-4774-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/abd9f14d4b8f/ECE3-11-4774-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/f8e1a58ecd9a/ECE3-11-4774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/8093734/32eb8cd1fa65/ECE3-11-4774-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Dhole pack size variation: Assessing the effect of Prey availability and Apex predator.豺群规模变化:评估猎物可获得性和顶级捕食者的影响
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 23;11(9):4774-4785. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7380. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Topcats and underdogs: intraguild interactions among three apex carnivores across Asia's forestscapes.顶级掠食者和劣势者:亚洲森林景观中三种顶级肉食动物的种内相互作用。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Dec;98(6):2114-2135. doi: 10.1111/brv.12998. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Every dog has its prey: Range-wide assessment of links between diet patterns, livestock depredation and human interactions for an endangered carnivore.每只狗都有自己的猎物:对濒危食肉动物的饮食模式、家畜捕食和人类互动之间关系的全范围评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 20;714:136798. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136798. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
4
Prey depletion as a threat to the world's large carnivores.猎物减少对全球大型食肉动物构成的威胁。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Aug 3;3(8):160252. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160252. eCollection 2016 Aug.
5
Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient.时空相互作用促进大型食肉动物在资源梯度上的同域共存。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 8;284(1848). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1860.
6
Methodological approaches for estimating populations of the endangered dhole .估算濒危豺种群数量的方法学途径。
PeerJ. 2022 Feb 22;10:e12905. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12905. eCollection 2022.
7
Contrasting effects of human settlement on the interaction among sympatric apex carnivores.人类聚居对同域顶级捕食者相互作用的对比影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;289(1973):20212681. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2681.
8
The cost of sympatry: spatio-temporal patterns in leopard dietary and physiological responses to tiger competition gradient in Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Uttarakhand, India.同域共存的代价:印度北阿坎德邦拉贾吉老虎保护区内,豹的饮食及生理对老虎竞争梯度的时空响应模式
Conserv Physiol. 2023 May 29;11(1):coad039. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coad039. eCollection 2023.
9
Patterns of livestock depredation by tiger (Panthera tigris) and leopard (Panthera pardus) in and around Corbett Tiger Reserve, Uttarakhand, India.印度北阿坎德邦科贝特老虎保护区及其周边地区虎( Panthera tigris )和豹( Panthera pardus )对家畜的捕食模式。
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0195612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195612. eCollection 2018.
10
Do conservation strategies that increase tiger populations have consequences for other wild carnivores like leopards?保护策略是否会增加老虎的数量,从而对其他野生食肉动物(如豹子)产生影响?
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):14673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51213-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring temporal activity of dholes, their prey, and competitors in East Java, Indonesia.探索印度尼西亚东爪哇岛的豺、其猎物及竞争者的时间活动规律。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e11666. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11666. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Long-term data reveal fitness costs of anthropogenic prey depletion for a subordinate competitor, the African wild dog ().长期数据揭示了人为猎物减少对从属竞争者非洲野犬造成的适应性代价。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e11402. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11402. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Native prey, not landscape change or novel prey, drive cougar () distribution at a boreal forest range edge.

本文引用的文献

1
Comment: On the Concept of Snowball Sampling.评论:关于雪球抽样的概念。
Sociol Methodol. 2011 Aug 1;41(1):367-371. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01243.x. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
2
Effect of ecological factors on fine-scale patterns of social structure in African lions.生态因素对非洲狮社会结构精细模式的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Nov;89(11):2665-2676. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13334. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Every dog has its prey: Range-wide assessment of links between diet patterns, livestock depredation and human interactions for an endangered carnivore.
本地猎物而非景观变化或新猎物驱动着美洲狮在北方森林边缘地带的分布。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Apr 1;14(4):e11146. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11146. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Feeding ecology of the endangered Asiatic wild dogs (Cuon alpinus) across tropical forests of the Central Indian Landscape.中印热带森林中濒危的亚洲野犬(豺)的食性生态。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 18;12(1):14029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17906-5.
5
Genetic analyses reveal demographic decline and population differentiation in an endangered social carnivore, Asiatic wild dog.遗传分析揭示了濒危的社会性食肉动物——亚洲野犬的种群衰退和分化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 12;11(1):16371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95918-3.
每只狗都有自己的猎物:对濒危食肉动物的饮食模式、家畜捕食和人类互动之间关系的全范围评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 20;714:136798. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136798. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
4
Do conservation strategies that increase tiger populations have consequences for other wild carnivores like leopards?保护策略是否会增加老虎的数量,从而对其他野生食肉动物(如豹子)产生影响?
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):14673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51213-w.
5
Standardization and validation of a panel of cross-species microsatellites to individually identify the Asiatic wild dog ().一组用于个体识别亚洲野犬的跨物种微卫星的标准化与验证
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 2;7:e7453. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7453. eCollection 2019.
6
Can hyena behaviour provide information on population trends of sympatric carnivores?鬣狗行为能否提供有关同域食肉动物种群趋势的信息?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 16;374(1781):20180052. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0052. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Insights from distribution dynamics inform strategies to conserve a dhole Cuon alpinus metapopulation in India.从分布动态中获得的启示为保护印度的豺犬 Cuon alpinus 复合种群提供了策略。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 28;9(1):3081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39293-0.
8
Interspecific Killing among Mammalian Carnivores.哺乳动物食肉动物之间的种间杀戮。
Am Nat. 1999 May;153(5):492-508. doi: 10.1086/303189.
9
Top predators constrain mesopredator distributions.顶级捕食者制约着中型捕食者的分布。
Nat Commun. 2017 May 23;8:15469. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15469.
10
Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient.时空相互作用促进大型食肉动物在资源梯度上的同域共存。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 8;284(1848). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1860.