• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估共病指数在确定老年男性泌尿肿瘤手术最合适候选人方面的作用。

Evaluation of comorbidity indices in determining the most suitable candidates for uro-oncological surgeries in elderly men.

作者信息

Selvi Ismail, Arik Ali Ihsan, Baydilli Numan, Basay Mehmet Sinan, Basar Halil

机构信息

Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura City Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Health Science University, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(1):24-38. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0246. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

DOI:10.5173/ceju.2021.0246
PMID:33976912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8097655/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the superiority of different comorbidity indices in determining the most suitable elderly male candidates for uro-oncological operations. While making this assessment, we also aimed to determine the risk factors that may affect surgery-related major complications and overall survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data of 543 male patients, 60 years or older, who underwent uro-oncological surgery (radical cystectomy, radical prostatectomy, radical or partial nephrectomy, transurethral resection of bladder tumor) between September 2009 and January 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients, preoperative comorbidity indices, postoperative complications, length of hospitalization, re-admission rates within 90 days and postoperative follow-up outcomes were recorded. Patients in similar tumor stages were divided into different subgroups. All subgroups were divided into two main categories: middle age (60-69 years-old) and elderly age (≥70-years-old).

RESULTS

No significant difference was found for all types of surgery in terms of postoperative outcomes in both age groups (p >0.05). Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI), Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM), Rockwood Frailty Index (RFI) and tumor characteristics were found to be more significant predictors for postoperative major complications and overall mortality than Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that patient age alone is not a risk factor for increased postoperative complications and overall mortality. Although many different comorbidity indices have been used in urological practice, ACCI, POSPOM and RFI are more valuable predictors. Uro-oncological surgeries may be performed safely in elderly males after a good clinical decision based on these indices.

摘要

引言

我们旨在评估不同合并症指数在确定最适合接受泌尿肿瘤手术的老年男性患者方面的优越性。在进行此项评估时,我们还旨在确定可能影响手术相关重大并发症和总生存期的风险因素。

材料与方法

回顾性评估了2009年9月至2019年1月期间接受泌尿肿瘤手术(根治性膀胱切除术、根治性前列腺切除术、根治性或部分肾切除术、经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术)的543例60岁及以上男性患者的数据。记录了患者的人口统计学、临床和病理特征、术前合并症指数、术后并发症、住院时间、90天内再入院率以及术后随访结果。将处于相似肿瘤分期的患者分为不同亚组。所有亚组分为两个主要类别:中年(60 - 69岁)和老年(≥70岁)。

结果

在两个年龄组中,所有类型手术的术后结果均未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。与东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级相比,年龄调整后的查尔森合并症指数(ACCI)、预测术后死亡率的术前评分(POSPOM)、罗克伍德衰弱指数(RFI)和肿瘤特征被发现是术后重大并发症和总死亡率更显著的预测因素。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,仅患者年龄并非术后并发症增加和总死亡率升高的风险因素。尽管泌尿外科实践中使用了许多不同的合并症指数,但ACCI、POSPOM和RFI是更有价值的预测指标。基于这些指数做出良好的临床决策后,老年男性可以安全地进行泌尿肿瘤手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7620/8097655/0bc786bc1a53/CEJU-74-0246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7620/8097655/0bc786bc1a53/CEJU-74-0246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7620/8097655/0bc786bc1a53/CEJU-74-0246-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of comorbidity indices in determining the most suitable candidates for uro-oncological surgeries in elderly men.评估共病指数在确定老年男性泌尿肿瘤手术最合适候选人方面的作用。
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(1):24-38. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0246. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
2
Comparative analysis of comorbidity and performance indices for prediction of oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who were treated with radical nephroureterectomy.接受根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者合并症与预测肿瘤学结局的性能指标的比较分析。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov;32(8):1141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Comparative performance of comorbidity indices for estimating perioperative and 5-year all cause mortality following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.比较几种合并症指数在预测膀胱癌根治性切除术围手术期和 5 年全因死亡率方面的性能。
J Urol. 2013 Jul;190(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
4
Geriatric assessment using the G8 to predict postoperative complications in patients undergoing major uro-oncologic surgery: Comparison with the Charlson Comorbidity Index.使用G8进行老年评估以预测接受大型泌尿肿瘤手术患者的术后并发症:与Charlson合并症指数的比较。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 May;13(4):426-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Oncological impact of inflammatory biomarkers in elderly patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder cancer.炎症生物标志物对接受根治性膀胱切除术治疗的老年尿路上皮膀胱癌患者的肿瘤学影响。
Arab J Urol. 2020 Aug 26;19(1):2-8. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1814974.
6
Predictive capacity of four comorbidity indices estimating perioperative mortality after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.四种合并症指数预测行根治性膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者围手术期死亡率的能力。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6 Pt B):E222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10938.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
Commentary on "Predictive capacity of four comorbidity indices estimating perioperative mortality after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder." Mayr R, May M, Martini T, Lodde M, Pycha A, Comploj E, Wieland WF, Denzinger S, Otto W, Burger M, Fritsche HM. Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy: BJU Int 2012;110(6 Pt B):E222-7 [Epub 2012 Feb 7].关于“四种合并症指数预测行根治性膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者围手术期死亡率的能力”的述评。Mayr R、May M、Martini T、Lodde M、Pycha A、Comploj E、Wieland WF、Denzinger S、Otto W、Burger M、Fritsche HM。意大利博尔扎诺中央医院泌尿科:BJU Int 2012;110(6 部分 B):E222-7 [2012 年 2 月 7 日电子出版]。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Jul;31(5):718-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.03.010.
8
Complications of laparoscopic surgery for urological cancer: a single institution analysis.泌尿外科癌症腹腔镜手术的并发症:单机构分析
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):786-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.022. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
9
Validating the predictors of outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.验证膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后结局的预测因素。
Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;125(2):223-231. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31799. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
10
Comorbidity and performance indices as predictors of cancer-independent mortality but not of cancer-specific mortality after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌后,合并症和功能指标可预测癌症无关死亡率,但不能预测癌症特异性死亡率。
Eur Urol. 2012 Oct;62(4):662-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.057. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comorbidity Scores and Machine Learning Methods Can Improve Risk Assessment in Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.合并症评分和机器学习方法可改善膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术的风险评估。
Bladder Cancer. 2022 Jun 3;8(2):155-163. doi: 10.3233/BLC-211640. eCollection 2022.
2
A CT-based deep learning model predicts overall survival in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.基于 CT 的深度学习模型预测根治性膀胱切除术后肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的总生存期:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2922-2932. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001194.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of EORTC, CUETO, and EAU risk stratification in prediction of recurrence, progression, and death of patients with initially non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): A cohort analysis.EORTC、CUETO 和 EAU 风险分层在预测初发非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者复发、进展和死亡中的验证:队列分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jun;9(11):4014-4025. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3007. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for elderly patients with localized renal cell carcinoma.老年局限性肾细胞癌患者腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的疗效
J BUON. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):2147-2154.
3
Staging the Host: Personalizing Risk Assessment for Radical Cystectomy Patients.
宿主分期:为根治性膀胱切除术患者进行个体化风险评估。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Sep;1(4):292-304. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Development of a New Comorbidity Assessment Tool for Specific Prediction of Perioperative Mortality in Contemporary Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy.开发一种新的合并症评估工具,用于特定预测接受根治性膀胱切除术的当代患者的围手术期死亡率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1942-1949. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07313-y. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
Comparison of Outcomes between Standard and Palliative Management for High Grade Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Patients Older than 85 Years.85岁以上高龄非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者标准治疗与姑息治疗效果的比较
Urol Int. 2019;102(3):277-283. doi: 10.1159/000496802. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
Age-adjusted charlson comorbidity index and 30-day morbidity in pelvic surgeries.年龄校正的查尔森合并症指数与盆腔手术30天发病率
South Asian J Cancer. 2018 Oct-Dec;7(4):240-243. doi: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_241_17.
7
Systematic Review of Comorbidity and Competing-risks Assessments for Bladder Cancer Patients.膀胱癌患者合并症与竞争风险评估的系统评价
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
8
Effects of age and comorbidity on survival vary according to risk grouping among patients with prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy: A retrospective competing-risk analysis from the K-CaP registry.在接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者中,年龄和合并症对生存的影响因风险分组而异:来自K-CaP注册中心的一项回顾性竞争风险分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12766. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012766.
9
Adherence to geriatric assessment-based recommendations in older patients with cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study in Belgium.基于老年综合评估的建议在老年癌症患者中的依从性:比利时多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;29(9):1987-1994. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy210.
10
Clinical implication of a quantitative frailty assessment tool for prognosis in patients with urological cancers.一种定量衰弱评估工具对泌尿系统癌症患者预后的临床意义。
Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 3;9(25):17396-17405. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24712.