Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;28(11):1214-1227. doi: 10.1111/acem.14279. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
Although falls are common, costly, and often preventable, emergency department (ED)-initiated fall screening and prevention efforts are rare. The Geriatric Emergency Medicine Applied Research Falls core (GEAR-Falls) was created to identify existing research gaps and to prioritize future fall research foci.
GEAR's 49 transdisciplinary stakeholders included patients, geriatricians, ED physicians, epidemiologists, health services researchers, and nursing scientists. We derived relevant clinical fall ED questions and summarized the applicable research evidence, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The highest-priority research foci were identified at the GEAR Consensus Conference.
We identified two clinical questions for our review (1) fall prevention interventions (32 studies) and (2) risk stratification and falls care plan (19 studies). For (1) 21 of 32 (66%) of interventions were a falls risk screening assessment and 15 of 21 (71%) of these were combined with an exercise program or physical therapy. For (2) 11 fall screening tools were identified, but none were feasible and sufficiently accurate for ED patients. For both questions, the most frequently reported study outcome was recurrent falls, but various process and patient/clinician-centered outcomes were used. Outcome ascertainment relied on self-reported falls in 18 of 32 (56%) studies for (1) and nine of 19 (47%) studies for (2).
Harmonizing definitions, research methods, and outcomes is needed for direct comparison of studies. The need to identify ED-appropriate fall risk assessment tools and role of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel persists. Multifactorial interventions, especially involving exercise, are more efficacious in reducing recurrent falls, but more studies are needed to compare appropriate bundle combinations. GEAR prioritizes five research priorities: (1) EMS role in improving fall-related outcomes, (2) identifying optimal ED fall assessment tools, (3) clarifying patient-prioritized fall interventions and outcomes, (4) standardizing uniform fall ascertainment and measured outcomes, and (5) exploring ideal intervention components.
尽管跌倒很常见、代价高昂且往往可以预防,但急诊科(ED)很少进行跌倒筛查和预防工作。老年急诊医学应用研究跌倒核心(GEAR-Falls)旨在确定现有的研究差距,并确定未来跌倒研究的重点。
GEAR 的 49 名跨学科利益相关者包括患者、老年病学家、ED 医生、流行病学家、卫生服务研究人员和护理科学家。我们得出了与 ED 临床跌倒相关的问题,并总结了适用的研究证据,遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,适用于范围审查。在 GEAR 共识会议上确定了最优先的研究重点。
我们确定了两个临床问题进行审查:(1)跌倒预防干预措施(32 项研究)和(2)风险分层和跌倒护理计划(19 项研究)。对于(1),32 项干预措施中的 21 项(66%)是跌倒风险筛查评估,其中 21 项中的 15 项(71%)与锻炼计划或物理治疗相结合。对于(2),确定了 11 种跌倒筛查工具,但没有一种对 ED 患者可行且足够准确。对于这两个问题,最常报告的研究结果是复发性跌倒,但也使用了各种过程和患者/临床医生为中心的结果。在 32 项研究中的 18 项(56%)和 19 项研究中的 9 项(47%)中,(1)和(2)分别依赖于自我报告的跌倒来确定结果。
需要协调定义、研究方法和结果,以便直接比较研究。仍然需要确定适合 ED 的跌倒风险评估工具以及急诊医疗服务(EMS)人员的作用。多因素干预措施,特别是涉及锻炼的干预措施,在减少复发性跌倒方面更有效,但需要更多的研究来比较合适的组合。GEAR 确定了五个研究重点:(1)EMS 在改善与跌倒相关的结果方面的作用,(2)确定最佳 ED 跌倒评估工具,(3)阐明患者优先的跌倒干预措施和结果,(4)标准化统一的跌倒评估和测量结果,以及(5)探索理想的干预措施组成部分。