Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, London, UK.
Department of Nursing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, PR China.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Sep;30(3):e1874. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1874. Epub 2021 May 12.
There is a lack of independent longitudinal evidence on the factor structure and validity of the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD). This study aimed to investigate the dimensionality of ZAN-BPD and its conceptual consistency over time.
Adult BPD participants (n = 276) were recruited for a multicentre, two-arm randomised clinical trial with ZAN-BPD measured at baseline and follow up at 12, 24 and 52 weeks. The construct and stability of the ZAN-BPD across 52 weeks was examined through a measurement equivalence/invariance procedure via Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling.
Factor analysis results showed that the ZAN-BPD had a bi-2 factor structure that was stable over 52 weeks with a general factor and two specific factors. Factor loadings for eight of the nine items were greater for the general factor than the two specific factors. Factor 1 contrasts externalising distress with internalising distress. Factor 2 contrasts depression and self-destruction with interpersonal anxiety and conflict.
ZAN-BPD is a conceptually and empirically valid measure of total BPD symptom severity in BPD patients over time suitable for use in clinical trials. Two factors related to the expression of distress and self-harm may be utilised as possible predictors of outcome.
关于边缘型人格障碍 Zanarini 评定量表(ZAN-BPD)的因子结构和效度,目前缺乏独立的纵向证据。本研究旨在调查 ZAN-BPD 的维度结构及其随时间的概念一致性。
招募了成年 BPD 参与者(n=276)进行多中心、双臂随机临床试验,在基线和 12、24 和 52 周时测量 ZAN-BPD。通过探索性结构方程建模,通过测量等效/不变性程序,检查 ZAN-BPD 在 52 周内的结构和稳定性。
因子分析结果表明,ZAN-BPD 具有双 2 因子结构,在 52 周内稳定,具有一个一般因子和两个特定因子。九个项目中的八个项目的因子负荷大于一般因子和两个特定因子。因子 1 对比了外在困扰与内在困扰。因子 2 对比了抑郁和自我毁灭与人际焦虑和冲突。
ZAN-BPD 是一种随着时间推移对 BPD 患者总体 BPD 症状严重程度具有概念上和经验上有效性的测量工具,适用于临床试验。与痛苦和自我伤害表达相关的两个因素可能被用作可能的结果预测指标。