Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan.
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;44(7):331-339. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000831.
This study aimed to compare diagnostic performances of 8 different imaging modalities for preoperative detection of axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with breast cancer by performing a network meta-analysis (NMA) using direct comparison studies with 2 or more imaging techniques.
PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for the studies evaluating the performances of 8 different imaging modalities for preoperative axillary LN staging in patients with breast cancer. The NMA was performed in patient-based analyses. The consistency was evaluated by examining the agreement between direct and indirect treatment effects, and publication bias was assessed by funnel plot asymmetry tests. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were obtained to calculate the probability of each imaging modality being the most effective diagnostic method.
A total of 2197 patients from 22 direct comparison studies using 8 different imaging modalities for preoperative detection of axillary LN metastasis in patients with breast cancer were included. For preoperative detection of axillary LN metastasis of breast cancer, elastography showed the highest SUCRA values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio. In addition, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/magnetic resonance, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed high SUCRA values.
Elastography showed the highest SUCRA values. Seven imaging modalities showed the complementary diagnostic roles for preoperative detection of axillary LN metastasis in patients with breast cancer, except mammography.
本研究旨在通过对 2 种或 2 种以上影像学技术进行直接比较研究,进行网络荟萃分析(NMA),比较 8 种不同影像学方法在术前检测乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结(LN)转移中的诊断性能。
在 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Embase 中检索评估 8 种不同影像学方法在术前乳腺癌腋窝 LN 分期中的性能的研究。在患者基础分析中进行 NMA。通过检查直接和间接治疗效果之间的一致性来评估一致性,并通过漏斗图不对称检验评估发表偏倚。获得累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值,以计算每种影像学方法作为最有效诊断方法的概率。
共有 2197 名患者来自 22 项直接比较研究,这些研究使用 8 种不同的影像学方法对乳腺癌患者进行术前腋窝 LN 转移检测。对于术前检测乳腺癌腋窝 LN 转移,弹性成像显示出最高的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性和诊断比值比的 SUCRA 值。此外,氟-18 氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(PET)或 PET/计算机断层扫描、氟-18 氟脱氧葡萄糖 PET/磁共振成像和对比增强计算机断层扫描显示出较高的 SUCRA 值。
弹性成像显示出最高的 SUCRA 值。除了乳房 X 线摄影术外,7 种影像学方法在术前检测乳腺癌患者腋窝 LN 转移中具有互补的诊断作用。