Suppr超能文献

一次性使用负压伤口治疗可降低闭合性手术切口的成本:英国和美国的经济评估。

Single-use negative pressure wound therapy reduces costs in closed surgical incisions: UK and US economic evaluation.

机构信息

Smith + Nephew, Fort Worth, TX, US.

Smith + Nephew, Hull, UK.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2021 May 1;30(Sup5):S23-S31. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup5.S23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) following closed surgical incisions has a demonstrable effect in reducing surgical site complications (SSC). However, there is little health economic evidence to support its widespread use. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sNPWT compared with standard care in reducing SSCs following closed surgical incisions.

METHOD

A decision analytic model was developed to explore the total costs and health outcomes associated with the use of the interventions in patients following vascular, colorectal, cardiothoracic, orthopaedic, C-section and breast surgery from the UK National Health Service (NHS) and US payer perspective over a 12-week time horizon. We modelled complications avoided (surgical site infection (SSI) and dehiscence) using data from a recently published meta-analysis. Cost data were sourced from published literature, NHS reference costs and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We conducted subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3 and body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

sNPWT resulted in better clinical outcomes and overall savings of £105 per patient from the UK perspective and $637 per patient from the US perspective. There were more savings when higher-risk patients with diabetes, or a BMI ≥30kg/m or an ASA≥3 were considered. We conducted both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and the results suggested that this conclusion is robust.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of sNPWT following closed surgical incisions saves cost when compared with standard care because of reduced incidence of SSC. Patients at higher risk should be targeted first as they benefit more from sNPWT. This analysis is underpinned by strong and robust clinical evidence from both randomised and observational studies.

摘要

目的

闭合性手术切口后使用一次性负压伤口疗法(sNPWT)可显著降低手术部位并发症(SSC)。然而,支持其广泛使用的健康经济学证据有限。我们旨在评估与标准护理相比,sNPWT 在降低闭合性手术切口后 SSC 方面的成本效益。

方法

我们开发了一个决策分析模型,从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)和美国支付者的角度,在 12 周的时间内,探讨了血管、结直肠、心胸、骨科、剖宫产和乳房手术后患者使用干预措施的总成本和健康结果。我们使用最近发表的荟萃分析中的数据来模拟避免的并发症(手术部位感染(SSI)和裂开)。成本数据来自已发表的文献、NHS 参考成本和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心。我们对糖尿病患者、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分≥3 分和 BMI≥30kg/m 的患者进行了亚组分析。还进行了敏感性分析。

结果

从英国的角度来看,sNPWT 可带来更好的临床结果,并且每例患者可节省 105 英镑;从美国的角度来看,每例患者可节省 637 美元。当考虑到糖尿病患者、BMI≥30kg/m 或 ASA≥3 的高风险患者时,节省更多。我们进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,结果表明这一结论是稳健的。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与标准护理相比,闭合性手术切口后使用 sNPWT 可降低 SSC 的发生率,从而节省成本。应首先针对高风险患者,因为他们从 sNPWT 中获益更多。本分析基于来自随机和观察性研究的强有力且可靠的临床证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验