Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 May 12;15(5):e0009011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009011. eCollection 2021 May.
The existence of locations with low but stable onchocerciasis prevalence is not well understood. An often suggested yet poorly investigated explanation is that the infection spills over from neighbouring locations with higher infection densities.
We adapted the stochastic individual based model ONCHOSIM to enable the simulation of multiple villages, with separate blackfly (intermediate host) and human populations, which are connected through the regular movement of the villagers and/or the flies. With this model we explore the impact of the type, direction and degree of connectedness, and of the impact of localized or full-area mass drug administration (MDA) over a range of connected village settings.
In settings with annual fly biting rates (ABR) below the threshold needed for stable local transmission, persistence of onchocerciasis prevalence can well be explained by regular human traffic and/or fly movement from locations with higher ABR. Elimination of onchocerciasis will then theoretically be reached by only implementing MDA in the higher prevalence area, although lingering infection in the low prevalence location can trigger resurgence of transmission in the total region when MDA is stopped too soon. Expanding MDA implementation to the lower ABR location can therefore shorten the duration of MDA needed. For example, when prevalence spill-over is due to human traffic, and both locations have about equal populations, then the MDA duration can be shortened by up to three years. If the lower ABR location has twice as many inhabitants, the reduction can even be up to six years, but if spill-over is due to fly movement, the expected reduction is less than a year.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although MDA implementation might not always be necessary in locations with stable low onchocerciasis prevalence, in many circumstances it is recommended to accelerate achieving elimination in the wider area.
低但稳定的盘尾丝虫病流行地区的存在尚未得到很好的理解。一种经常被提出但研究甚少的解释是,感染从感染密度较高的邻近地区溢出。
我们改编了随机个体基础模型 ONCHOSIM,以能够模拟多个村庄,每个村庄都有单独的黑蝇(中间宿主)和人群,通过村民和/或苍蝇的定期移动进行连接。使用该模型,我们探讨了连接类型、方向和程度的影响,以及局部或全面药物治疗(MDA)的影响,在一系列连接的村庄环境中。
在每年的苍蝇叮咬率(ABR)低于稳定局部传播所需阈值的环境中,定期的人类交通和/或来自更高 ABR 地区的苍蝇移动可以很好地解释盘尾丝虫病流行率的持续存在。理论上,通过仅在更高流行地区实施 MDA 就可以消除盘尾丝虫病,尽管在 MDA 过早停止时,低流行地区的残留感染可能会引发整个地区传播的再次发生。因此,将 MDA 实施扩展到较低 ABR 地区可以缩短 MDA 所需的持续时间。例如,当流行率溢出是由于人类交通造成的,并且两个地区的人口大致相等,则 MDA 持续时间可以缩短多达三年。如果低 ABR 位置的居民人数是两倍,那么减少甚至可以达到六年,但如果溢出是由于苍蝇的移动,预期的减少不到一年。
结论/意义:尽管在稳定的低盘尾丝虫病流行地区实施 MDA 不一定总是必要的,但在许多情况下,建议加速在更广泛的地区实现消除。