• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期停用阿司匹林的急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗时,阿司匹林治疗时间长短对临床结局的影响。

Effect of aspirin treatment duration on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with early aspirin discontinuation and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

机构信息

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251109. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251109
PMID:33979377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8115803/
Abstract

Recent clinical trials showed that short aspirin duration (1 or 3 months) in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduced the risk of bleeding and did not increase the ischemic risk compared to 12-month DAPT in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it is unclear about the optimal duration of aspirin in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of aspirin treatment duration on clinical outcomes in a cohort of ACS patients with early aspirin interruption and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018, we included 498 ACS patients (age 70.18 ± 12.84 years, 71.3% men) with aspirin stopped for various reasons before 6 months after PCI and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. The clinical outcomes between those with aspirin treatment ≤ 1 month and > 1 month were compared in 12-month follow up after PCI. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the covariates between groups. The mean duration of aspirin treatment was 7.52 ± 8.10 days vs. 98.05 ± 56.70 days in the 2 groups (p<0.001). The primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization and stroke occurred in 12.6% and 14.4% in the 2 groups (adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.85-1.68). The safety outcome of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding was also similar (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.34-1.40) between the 2 groups. In conclusion, patients with ≤ 1 month aspirin treatment had similar clinical outcomes to those with treatment > 1 month. Our results indicated that ≤ 1-month aspirin may be enough in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy strategy for ACS patients undergoing PCI.

摘要

近期临床试验表明,在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)中短期(1 或 3 个月)阿司匹林治疗后转为 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗,与 12 个月 DAPT 相比可降低出血风险且不会增加缺血风险。然而,P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗中阿司匹林的最佳持续时间尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 ACS 患者早期中断阿司匹林治疗并接受 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗时,阿司匹林治疗持续时间对临床结局的影响。纳入 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间因各种原因在 PCI 后 6 个月内停用阿司匹林的 498 例 ACS 患者(年龄 70.18±12.84 岁,71.3%为男性),并接受 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗。比较 PCI 后 12 个月随访中阿司匹林治疗≤1 个月和>1 个月的两组患者的临床结局。采用逆概率治疗加权法平衡组间协变量。两组患者的阿司匹林治疗平均持续时间分别为 7.52±8.10 天和 98.05±56.70 天(P<0.001)。两组主要复合终点(全因死亡率、复发性 ACS 或计划性血运重建和卒中)发生率分别为 12.6%和 14.4%(调整后 HR 1.19,95%CI 0.85-1.68)。两组 BARC 3 或 5 级出血的安全性结局也相似(调整后 HR 0.69,95%CI 0.34-1.40)。总之,阿司匹林治疗≤1 个月的患者与治疗>1 个月的患者临床结局相似。我们的结果表明,ACS 患者 PCI 后 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗中,≤1 个月的阿司匹林治疗可能已足够。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7a/8115803/68de03039499/pone.0251109.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7a/8115803/6db613cde6bd/pone.0251109.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7a/8115803/68de03039499/pone.0251109.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7a/8115803/6db613cde6bd/pone.0251109.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7a/8115803/68de03039499/pone.0251109.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of aspirin treatment duration on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with early aspirin discontinuation and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.早期停用阿司匹林的急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗时,阿司匹林治疗时间长短对临床结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251109. eCollection 2021.
2
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials.P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征中常规双联抗血小板治疗或阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:SMART-DATE 和 SMART-CHOICE 试验的汇总分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.053. Epub 2021 May 16.
3
Extended Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs DAPT in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes at High Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: The OPT-BIRISK Randomized Clinical Trial.高缺血和出血风险的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的氯吡格雷单药治疗与 DAPT 治疗比较:OPT-BIRISK 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;9(6):523-531. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0534.
4
Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.替格瑞洛单用或替格瑞洛加阿司匹林用于急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 1 至 12 个月(ULTIMATE-DAPT):一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Lancet. 2024 May 11;403(10439):1866-1878. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00473-2. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
5
Ticagrelor monotherapy for acute coronary syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis of TICO and T-PASS trials.替格瑞洛单药治疗急性冠脉综合征:TICO 和 T-PASS 试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 1;45(33):3045-3056. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae249.
6
P2Y Inhibitor Monotherapy or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 P2Y 抑制剂单药治疗或双联抗血小板治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Feb 14;81(6):537-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.041.
7
Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗对心血管事件的影响:SMART-CHOICE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2428-2437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8146.
8
The Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin Discontinuation on a Background of a P2Y Inhibitor in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿司匹林停药联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者 P2Y 抑制剂的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):538-545. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046251. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 monotherapy versus traditional DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: meta-analysis and viewpoint.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中短期双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)继以 P2Y12 单药治疗与传统 DAPT 的比较:荟萃分析和观点。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):173-176. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01985-9.
10
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin in secondary prevention of coronary events: a meta-analysis of RCTs.P2Y12抑制剂与阿司匹林在冠状动脉事件二级预防中的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 21;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04668-x.

本文引用的文献

1
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe to Abandon Aspirin?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗:停用阿司匹林安全吗?
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2021 Jan;37(1):1-8. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202101_37(1).20200806A.
2
Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗继以 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):308-319. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa739.
3
Validation of high bleeding risk criteria and definition as proposed by the academic research consortium for high bleeding risk.
学术研究联盟针对高出血风险所提出的高出血风险标准及定义的验证
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 7;41(38):3743-3749. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa671.
4
Aspirin-Free Prasugrel Monotherapy Following Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients With Stable CAD: The ASET Pilot Study.稳定型冠心病患者冠状动脉支架置入术后阿司匹林-free普拉格雷单药治疗:ASET初步研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 12;13(19):2251-2262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Pooled Analysis of Bleeding, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality in Clinical Trials of Time-Constrained Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后限时双重抗血小板治疗临床试验中出血、主要不良心血管事件和全因死亡率的汇总分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 18;9(16):e017109. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017109. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
The Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin Discontinuation on a Background of a P2Y Inhibitor in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿司匹林停药联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者 P2Y 抑制剂的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):538-545. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046251. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
7
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
8
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy with Clopidogrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛单药治疗P2Y12抑制剂的比较
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061657.
9
Risk/Benefit Tradeoff of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Early and Late After an Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From AUGUSTUS.急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期和晚期心房颤动患者抗栓治疗的风险/获益权衡:来自 AUGUSTUS 的见解。
Circulation. 2020 May 19;141(20):1618-1627. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046534. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
10
Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Network Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者的最佳抗栓治疗方案:一项更新的网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):582-589. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6175.