Suppr超能文献

扁桃体周围脓肿大小作为药物治疗成功的预测指标

Peritonsillar Abscess Size as a Predictor of Medical Therapy Success.

作者信息

Urban Matthew J, Masliah Jamie, Heyd Cameron, Patel Tirth R, Nielsen Thomas

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Rush University Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022 Feb;131(2):211-218. doi: 10.1177/00034894211015590. Epub 2021 May 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success of sole medical therapy (MT) versus surgical therapy (ST) in patients with both clinically and radiographically confirmed peritonsillar abscess (PTA). To also determine treatment safety based on abscess size, and identify predictors of treatment failure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort of 3 hospitals in a single academic health system. A total of 214 immunocompetent patients diagnosed with uncomplicated PTA underwent a contrasted CT scan of the neck. About 87 patients were treated with sole MT (intravenous antibiotics and steroids), and 127 patients were treated with ST (MT plus drainage).

RESULTS

Treatment failure occurred in 8.0% of the MT group and 7.9% of the ST group ( = 1.00). In PTAs <2 cm, treatment failure occurred in 5.3% of the MT group and 5.0% of the ST group ( = 1.00). In PTAs ≥2 cm, treatment failure occurred in 13.3% of the MT group and 9.0% treated with ST ( = .53). Size ≥2 cm (OR - 3.46,  = .08) and IV clindamycin as sole IV antibiotic (OR - 2.46,  = .15) trended toward predicting treatment failure. In addition to those considered failures, 7.0% of the ST group returned to the ED with pain versus 0% of the MT group ( = .01).

CONCLUSION

Frequency of treatment failure was not significantly different among patients receiving MT and ST. Abscesses ≥2 cm in size were more likely to fail in both groups and ST was not statistically superior. Sole MT for uncomplicated PTA may help reduce unnecessary procedures and healthcare costs.

摘要

目的

评估单纯药物治疗(MT)与手术治疗(ST)对临床和影像学检查均确诊为扁桃体周围脓肿(PTA)患者的治疗效果。同时根据脓肿大小确定治疗安全性,并找出治疗失败的预测因素。

方法

这是一项对单一学术医疗系统中3家医院的回顾性队列研究。共有214例免疫功能正常且诊断为非复杂性PTA的患者接受了颈部增强CT扫描。约87例患者接受单纯MT治疗(静脉使用抗生素和类固醇),127例患者接受ST治疗(MT加引流)。

结果

MT组治疗失败率为8.0%,ST组为7.9%(P = 1.00)。在脓肿直径<2 cm的PTA患者中,MT组治疗失败率为5.3%,ST组为5.0%(P = 1.00)。在脓肿直径≥2 cm的PTA患者中,MT组治疗失败率为13.3%,ST组为9.0%(P = 0.53)。脓肿直径≥2 cm(比值比-3.46,P = 0.08)和仅使用静脉注射克林霉素作为唯一静脉抗生素(比值比-2.46,P = 0.15)有预测治疗失败的趋势。除了那些被视为治疗失败的患者外,ST组有7.0%的患者因疼痛返回急诊室。而MT组为0%(P = 0.01)。

结论

接受MT和ST治疗的患者中,治疗失败的频率没有显著差异。两组中脓肿直径≥2 cm的患者更有可能治疗失败,且ST在统计学上并无优势。对于非复杂性PTA采用单纯MT治疗可能有助于减少不必要的手术和医疗费用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验