Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry.
Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry.
J Oral Sci. 2021 Jun 29;63(3):227-230. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.20-0500. Epub 2021 May 13.
This study assessed radiopacity of resin-based computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials by areal grayscale pixel value measurement.
Radiopacities of six resin-based CAD/CAM block materials and resin composite were evaluated and compared to that of enamel and dentin. Specimens of 1-mm thickness were placed on photostimulable phosphor plate and irradiated with digital x-ray unit. On the radiographic image, regions of interests were determined for each specimen and areal grayscale pixel values were measured. Elemental analysis was performed with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) on field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images of the specimens. Data were analyzed statistically (α = 0.05).
Radiopacity values of the restorative materials were significantly different from each other (P < 0.05). Radiopacity values of two resin-based CAD/CAM materials were significantly lower than that of dentin (P < 0.05). All tested restorative materials contain zirconium, three materials contain barium, and only resin composite contains lanthanum.
Four CAD/CAM materials with higher amounts of zirconia or barium (>18%) had radiopacity values significantly higher than the dentin; while two materials with lower amounts of zirconia (<4%) and/or no-barium, had radiopacity values significantly lower than the dentin. EDS analysis suggests materials containing elements with higher atom numbers such as zirconia and barium could exhibit higher radiopacity.
本研究通过面灰度像素值测量评估了基于树脂的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)材料的射线可透性。
评估了六种基于树脂的 CAD/CAM 块材料和树脂复合材料的射线可透性,并将其与牙釉质和牙本质的射线可透性进行了比较。将 1 毫米厚的试件放置在光激励磷光体板上,并使用数字 X 射线装置进行照射。在射线照相图像上,为每个试件确定感兴趣区域,并测量面灰度像素值。通过对试件的场发射扫描电子显微镜(FESEM)图像进行能谱分析(EDS)进行元素分析。数据采用统计学方法进行分析(α=0.05)。
修复材料的射线可透性值彼此之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。两种基于树脂的 CAD/CAM 材料的射线可透性值明显低于牙本质(P<0.05)。所有测试的修复材料都含有锆,三种材料含有钡,只有树脂复合材料含有镧。
四种含有较高量氧化锆或钡(>18%)的 CAD/CAM 材料的射线可透性值明显高于牙本质;而两种含有较低量氧化锆(<4%)和/或不含钡的材料的射线可透性值明显低于牙本质。EDS 分析表明,含有较高原子数元素的材料,如氧化锆和钡,可能具有较高的射线可透性。